an early spokesperson for the raw food movement, which is becoming ever more fashionable. 'The fly feeds on fresh leaves, the frog swallows the fly as it is and the stork eats the living frog. Nature thus teaches us that a rational diet should be based on eating things in their raw state.'29
Many leading Nazi ideologues also shared today's deep-seated commitment to animal
For anyone with a functioning moral compass, this can only seem like barbaric cognitive dissonance. But for the Nazis it all made sense. The German needed to reconnect with nature, restore his organic purity, find holistic balance. Animals have exactly such a balance because they are immune to reason. Hence, the ideologues believed they were virtuous and deserving of respect. Jews, on the other hand, were alien and deracinating. They were the reason the 'biotic community' of Germany was out of balance.
Animal rights advocates correctly note that animal rights activism was a major concern in pre-Nazi Germany and that the animal rights movement shouldn't be associated with Nazism. But as with environmentalism, this is less of a defense than it sounds. It is fine to say that many of Nazism's concerns were held by people who were not Nazis. But the fact that these conventionally leftist views were held by Nazis suggests that Nazism isn't as alien to mainstream progressive thought as some would have us believe.
Ingrid Newkirk, the president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, famously declared, 'When it comes to feelings, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. There is no rational basis for saying that a human being has special rights.'30 Few sentiments could be more fascist. First there is the emphasis on 'feelings' — not thought or reason — as the defining characteristic of life. Second is the assumption that the higher 'feelings' — those associated with conscience — are of such little consequence that they don't enter into the equation. When Newkirk says there's no 'rational' basis for distinguishing between vermin and humans, what she really means is that there is no legitimate distinction between them, which is why PETA felt no compunction in comparing the slaughter of pigs, cows, and chickens to the slaughter of Jews in their infamous 'Holocaust on your plate' campaign.
We joke a lot about 'health fascists' these days. The government — partly driven by creeping national- socialist health-care costs — is increasingly fixated on our health. Children's shows on state-run television have been instructed to propagandize for healthier living, so much so that Cookie Monster's 'C is for Cookie' has been demoted by the new jingle 'Cookies Are a Sometimes Food.' This of course is nothing new. Herbert Hoover, Woodrow Wilson's food administrator, required children to sign a loyalty pledge to the state that they wouldn't eat between meals. What we do not understand is that the citizen hectored and hounded by the state to quit smoking has as much right to complain about fascism as an author would if his book was banned. As Robert Proctor was the first to fully catalog in his magisterial work
The Nazis used the slogan
In 2004 Hillary Clinton insisted that we look at children's entertainment 'from a public health perspective.' Subjecting 'our children to so much of this unchecked media is a kind of contagion,' a 'silent epidemic' threatening 'long-term public health damage to many, many children and therefore to society.' Richard Carmona, Bush's surgeon general in 2003, led a long list of public figures who believed 'obesity has reached epidemic proportions.' His 'simple prescription' for ending America's obesity epidemic? 'Every American needs to eat healthy food in healthy portions and be physically active every day.' This sort of thing changes the meaning of an epidemic from a public health threat that puts people in danger against their will — typhoid, poisoned food, bear attacks — and replaces it with the danger of people doing things they want to do. Just look at how the war on smoking has institutionalized hysteria. Free speech for anything even remotely 'pro-tobacco' has been culturally banned and almost totally abolished by law. Tobacco companies themselves have been forced to ritualistically — and expensively — denounce their own products. Free association of smokers has been outlawed in much of America. In addition, the fixation with children allows social planners to intervene to stop 'child abusers' who might smoke near children, even outdoors.
Compare all this with a typical admonition found in a Hitler Youth health manual: 'Food is not a private matter!' Or, 'You have the duty to be healthy!' Or as another uniformed health official put it: 'The government has a perfect right to influence personal behavior to the best of its ability if it is for the welfare of the individual and the community as a whole.' That last official was C. Everett Koop.32
Vegetarianism, public health, and animal rights were merely different facets of the obsession with the organic order that pervaded the German fascist mind then, and the liberal fascist mind today. Again and again Hitler insisted that there 'is no gap between the organic and inorganic worlds.' Oddly, this fueled the Nazis' view of the Jew as the 'other.' As I mentioned earlier, in a widely read book on nutrition, Hugo Kleine blamed 'capitalist special interests' and 'masculinized Jewish half-women' for the decline in the quality of German foods, which contributed to the rise in cancer. Himmler hoped to switch the SS entirely to organic food and was dedicated to making the transition for all of Germany after the war. Organic food was seamlessly linked to the larger Nazi conception of the organic nation living in harmony with a pre-or non-Christian ecosystem.
Many Americans today are obsessed with the organic. Whole Foods has become a franchise of cathedrals to this cult, and even Wal-Mart has succumbed to it. The essence of Whole Foods — where I shop frequently, by the way — is, in the words of the
Then there's EnviroKidz cereal. Read the box and you learn that 'EnviroKidz chooz organic food. Organic agriculture respects the land and the wild creatures who live on it.' It concludes, 'So if you want the kind of planet where bio-diversity is protected and human beings tread more softly upon the Earth, then chooz certified organic cereals from EnviroKidz.
None of this is evil, and it is certainly well-meaning. But what's fascinating about Whole Foods and the culture it represents is how dependent it is on concocting what amounts to a new pan-human ethnicity. Over thirty years ago, Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Nathan Glazer wrote in