Warburg. The creation of a powerful Federal Reserve Board was also his idea as a means by which the regional branches could be absorbed into a central bank with control safely in New York.
Professor Edwin Seligman, a member of the international banking family of J&W Seligman, and head of the Department of Economics at Columbia University, explains and praises the plan: It was in my study that Mr. Warburg first conceived the idea of presenting his views to the public.3... In its fundamental features the Federal Reserve Act is the work of Mr. Warburg more than any other man in the country.... The existence of a Federal Reserve Board creates, in everything but in name, a real central bank.... Mr. Warburg had a practical object in view.... It was incumbent on him to remember that the education of the country must be gradual and that a large part of the task was to break down prejudices and remove suspicion. His plans therefore contain all sorts of elaborate suggestions designed to guard the public against fancied dangers and to persuade the country that the general scheme was at all practicable. It was the hope of Mi.
Warburg that with the lapse of time it may be possible to eliminate 1. Krooss, Vol. Ill, 1969 edition, p. 1202.
2. Quoted by Kolko,
3. Most historians share Seligman's view regarding Warburg's seminal role in the creation of the Federal Reserve System. Certain participants in the drama, however, apparently eager to capture some of the spotlight of fame for themselves, are in vigorous disagreement. For example, William McAdoo, Secretary of the Treasury at the time, says: 'This assertion is so completely erroneous that it must have emanated from ignorance rather than mendacity.' See McAdoo, p. 281. Competing egos notwithstanding, an objective reading of the record leads to the conclusion that, while others no doubt provided great input in the areas of technical drafts and political negotiations, the
COMPETITION IS A SIN 441
from the law not a few clauses which were inserted largely, at his suggestion, for educational purposes.1
THE ALDRICH BILL
The first draft of the Jekyll Island plan was submitted to the Senate by Nelson Aldrich but, due to the Senator's unexpected illness when he returned to Washington, it was actually written by Frank Vanderlip and Benjamin Strong.2 Although it was co-authored by Congressman Vreeland, it immediately became known as the Aldrich Bill. Vreeland, by his own admission, had little to do with it either, but his willingness to be a team player in the game of national deception was of great value. Writing in the August 25, 1910, issue of
What an amazing statement. It is brilliantly insidious because of the half truths it contains. It is true that monopolies cannot-or at least
(New York: 1914), pp. 3-6. '
2- Vanderlip, 'From Farm Boy to Financier,' p. 72.
t / A B e t t e r S y s t e m of Banking and Currency,' by Edward B. Vreeland,
442 THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND
that this was to mark the disappearance of the government from the hanking business. In fact, it was just the opposite, because it marked the
Half truths and propaganda notwithstanding, the organizational structure proposed by the Aldrich Bill was similar in many ways to the old Bank of the United States. It was to have the right to convert federal debt into money, to loan that money to the government, to control the affairs of regional banks, and to be the depository of government funds. The dissimilarities were in those provisions which gave the Creature