the Government as it had embarrassed the Government of Louis XVI.
When a Government, Bonaparte declared, is dependent for money upon bankers, they and not the leaders of that Government control the situation, since 'the hand that gives is above the hand that takes.'...
'Money,' he declared, 'has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency: their sole object is gain.'1
One of Napoleon's first blows against the bankers was to
establish an independent Bank of France with himself as president.
But even this bank was not trusted, and government funds were never placed into it. It was his refusal to borrow, however, that caused the most concern among the financiers. Actually, to them this was a mixture of both bad and good news. The bad news was that they were denied the benefit of royalty payments on fractional money. The good news was that, without resorting to debt, they were confident Napoleon could not militarily defend himself. Thus, he easily could be toppled and replaced by Louis XVI of the old monarchic dynasty who was receptive to banker influence. Wilson continues:
They had good hope of compassing his downfall. None believed that he could finance war on a great scale now that the resource of paper money had been denied him by the destruction of the Assignat.
Where would he obtain the indispensable gold and silver to feed and equip a great army? Pitt [the Prime Minister of England] counted already on a coalition of England, Austria, Prussia, Russia, Spain, 1. R. McNair Wilson,
2. The Assignat was pure fiat money which rapidly became totally worthless in commerce and which all but destroyed the French economy.
222
THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND
Sweden, and numerous small states. Some 600,000 men would be put into the field. All the resources of England's wealth—that is to say, of the world's wealth—would be placed at the disposal of this overwhelming force. Could the Corsican muster 200,000? Could he arm them? Could he feed them? If the lead bullets did not destroy him, the gold bullets would soon make an end. He would be forced, like his neighbors, to come, hat in hand, for loans and, like them, to accept the banker's terms....
He could not put his hands on ?2,000,000, so empty was the Treasury and so depleted the nation's stock of metallic money.
London waited with interest to see how the puzzle would be solved.1
Napoleon solved the puzzle quite simply by selling off some real estate. Those crazy Americans gave him ?3,000,000 for a vast swamp called Louisiana.
A PLAN TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES
Napoleon did not want war, but he knew that Europe's
financial rulers would not settle for peace—unless, of course, they were forced into it by the defeat of their puppet regimes or unless, somehow, it would be to their monetary advantage. It was in pursuit of the latter tactic that he threatened to take direct possession of Holland, which then was ruled by his brother, King Louis.
Napoleon knew that the Dutch were heavily in debt to the English bankers. If Holland were to be annexed by France, this debt would never be repaid. So Napoleon made a proposal to England's bankers that, if they would convince the English government to accept peace with France, he would agree to leave Holland alone.
The negotiations were handled by the banker, Pierre-Cesar Labouchere, who was sent by the Dutch, and the English banker, Sir Francis Baring who was Labouchere's father-in-law. Although this was an attractive proposal to the bankers, at least on a short-term basis, it was still against their nature to forego the immense profits of war and mercantilism. They revised the proposal, therefore, to include a plan whereby both England and France would combine forces to destroy the newly independent United States and bring at least half of it—the industrial half— back under the domination of England. The incredible plan, conceived by the French banker, Ouvard, called for military invasion and conquest followed by division of the spoils. England would receive 1. R. McNair Wilson, pp. 71 -72.
THE ROTHSCHILD FORMULA
223
the northern states, united with Canada, while the southern states would fall to France. Napoleon was to be tempted by offering him the awesome title of 'King of America.' McNair Wilson tells us: Labouchere wrote to Baring on March 21, and enclosed a note for
[British Foreign Secretary] Wellesley dictated by Ouvrard which ran:
'From a conqueror he (Napoleon) is becoming a preserver; the first result of his marriage with Marie Louise will be that he will make an offer of peace to England. It is to this nation's
Napoleon to lend his aid to destroy the life-work of Louis XVI?... It is to her (England's) interest to conclude peace and to flatter Napoleon's vanity by recognizing his work and his imperial title.'...
The Cabinet discussed the proposals and approved them.
Wellesley at once hurried to Baring's house to give him the good news.... The Dutch would be able to pay and would be compelled to pay in gold.
Unhappily Napoleon found out what was afoot and took
somewhat strong objections to the plan of a joint attack on the United States. He arrested Ouvrard, dismissed
