http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta245.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:13 AM]
ZetaTalk: Fitzgerald Indictments
public. Fitzgerald reportedly appeared with Miers and Rice that same day before the D.C. District
Court. The last ditch attempts by the White House to prevent the release of the indictments and their
criminal contents were led by Miers and Rice, since Gonzalez has reportedly been indicted in an
additional count for refusing to issue the original indictments as Bush's attorney general.
Importantly, the dismissals by both the district and appellate courts will likely preclude an
additional appeal by the Bush administration to the United States Supreme Court, since two
consecutive reversals ordinarily prevent the high court from granting relief. Miers and Rice also
reportedly attempted to have the courts place a gag order on Fitzgerald and the grand jury in
another attempt to obstruct justice and prevent the criminal and far-reaching contents of the
indictments from becoming public.' [Note: rapidly moving drama that is likely to result in a Nixon
type result or complete decapitation of the White House as the Zetas have predicted.]
Signs of the Times #1504
Bush orders Fitzgerald fired and espionage indictments quashed [Oct 21] http://www.tomflocco.com
'Today Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald handed over 22 indictments to Attorney General Alberto
Gonzalez, accusing President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard Cheney and others of
espionage, obstruction of justice, perjury and a variety of other charges in the matter of the
CIA/Valerie Plame leak-gate case. Bush then ordered Gonzalez to fire Fitzgerald and have the
indictments quashed and sealed. Gonzalez refused to release the indictments which have been
handed down by the grand jury and ordered served by a judge.' [and from another] [Sep 19]
'Apparently, there is brisk movement within the US Federal Court of Chicago to get these
indictments out despite intense pressure from within by a Judge Magistrate named Mark R. Filip,
who has thus far suppressed them from being released to the public. There is team of judges that
have decided that they are no longer going to tolerate this type activity and I believe they are well
on their way to try to force these indictments out rather than keep them sealed.' [and from another]
[Nov 12, 2003] 'Mark Filip, a Chicago lawyer who turned 37 in May, has been nominated by
President George Bush to fill a federal court vacancy in Chicago. If approved by the full Senate,
Filip will be younger than any judge who now serves on the U.S. District Court for Northern
Illinois.' [and from another] http://www.americanfreepress.net/ [Aug 15] 'In late July, reports about
the recent bomb scare in the subway under the congressional offices at the Dirksen Building-
coincidently near where Fitzgerald was holding his grand jury hearings-raised questions as to
whether government operatives were sending the zealous prosecutor a 'warning message' that he
was entering dangerous waters with his investigation. The bomb scare was reported to local police
late Monday afternoon, July 18, causing the subway to be evacuated for approximately 45 minutes
while bomb sniffing dogs and SWAT team members searched for what was reported to be a
suspicious package left on one of the subway cars.'
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta245.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:13 AM]
ZetaTalk: Corporate Thugs
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Corporate Thugs
written Mar 23, 2006
Another Press conference. I just put some of it on and Bush is very nasty to the press while yucking it up.
People are dying in Iraq. He goes on these long tangents about liberty. When a reporter tries to cut in and
ask a question-he gets pissed.
Why is Bush trying to show that he can stand before live questioners, unlike his past? He has been appearing, for
years, only in front of well screened questioners, if taking any questions at all, only giving the rare press conference.
Now we have him day after day, before audiences presumed to be asking the tough questions. Bush has ignored bad
polls in the past, so this is unlikely to be the reason. He is known to resent being questioned on his policies, becoming
enraged when challenged, so presumably would not deal with this voluntarily. If voter fraud so easily put him back in
the White House in 2004, could not this be presumed to work in 2006, keeping his Republican majority in the
Congress? And certainly, where talk of impeachment is being mentioned even in the major media, the current
