ZetaTalk: Government

rubber

stamp the Bush Administration’s plans, drawn up by civilians and combat avoiders such as the current US President

himself. Anyone questioning the treatment of US citizens, not granted rights in being detained endlessly in

questionable quarters without being charged, was a terrorist hugger. Thus, civil rights out the window and the

Constitution and Bill of Rights used as toilet paper. Given the horror of 911, the first attack on the continental US

ever, and the drum-beat of accusations of anyone opposing the Bush Administration for any reason, the voters decided

to give the President the benefit of the doubt and empower him. Now what?

Those who have discerned that the Bush Administration has an agenda, not spoken but hidden behind the bluster, are

now seeing an administration that stole an election from Gore, the popularly elected President, and is so casual about

civil rights that they are frankly breaking the law by their imprisonment of innocents, without charges, are horrified.

Will war with Iraq not proceed, a virtual martial law in the US be imposed, even without the formality of pronouncing

this? To put this into perspective, it should be stated that the President had the right to instigate war with Iraq before

the elections, even without getting Congressional approval, if he could explain this in terms that include national

defense. The President had the ability to imprison innocents without charges, despite international bluster and national

complaints within the court system, as the memory of 911 was so recent that all who opposed this imprisonment were

termed terrorist huggers. The President also had the ability to impose martial law, via FEMA, as man conspiratorialists

have enunciated, the US Presidential directives having put this in place years ago, in anticipation of the pole shift end

times. So, has anything changed?

At the time of the mid-term elections, the world stands united against the Bush Administration for its plans to attack

Iraq on slight excuse. Terrorist attacks have not been traced to Iraq instigation, countries such as Korea have the bomb

but are being excused, and Russia uses chemical weapons on its own citizens without umbrage. The world is united

against the Bush Administration plans to start a war with Iraq, and even their ally Israel is having domestic problems

with the hard liners. The US economy, despite an artificially maintained Stock Market index, is in the tank, with

economic indicators steadily worsening. Earthquakes under-reporting is finally being noticed, with the quakes now

creating devastation that cannot be ignored. The weather has reached the point of being beyond argument, with the

common man wondering what will come next, at this rate. Those in the US Military who have experienced combat are

horrified at the prospect of a casual war with no grounds except ambition, while the Bush Administration is attempting

to supplant the military command with those clubby with Bush, civilians or those without combat experience all.

Given that the arrogant and ambitious Bush Administration can be expected to assume a Bush Mandate, what is likely

to occur?

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g171.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:20 AM]

ZetaTalk: Backlash

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Backlash

Note: written for the Nov 3, 2002 IRC Session

Where ambition is tied up in argument, haranguing, and lack of automatic approval, those concerned with stopping

Bush would sit back and allow the squabble to proceed. This is what would have occurred if the Democrats had taken

the Senate firmly in the elections. The economy, civil rights, and concern for the health and well being of the citizens

of the country would have prevailed, at least in argument, and thus thwarted the Bush Administration plans. Where

those with raw ambitions, and dictatorial tendencies, such as the Bush Administration has exhibited, are given what

they presume to be a mandate, those who are opposed to the outcome must take action, as without action the

ambitions run amuck, driving the country into war, the world into chaos, and the citizenry into subservience under a

dictatorship that has nothing to do with the well-being of the citizens. How then do those who consider that:

1. a pole shift might not happen, and the Republican Party would have to live with the aftereffects of such an

autocratic regime.

2. a war might be instigated where the US Military would be required to fight in the Middle East endlessly, with

no goal in sight except capture of oil producing countries for the Bush cartel.

3. allies world wide, such as Russia, who hold the bomb, might be driven by the disruption in the Middle east to

the extent that they would cease to become allies, driving the US into isolation and a defensive posture.

4. the economic repercussions of isolation would reduce the US to an economic crawl, eliminating hope of

recovery for decades, especially under the cloud of a Republican leadership that was akin to Hitler in its lack of

foresight and treatment of the citizens of the world.

Place into the posture of those thus concerned the wealthy elite of the world, which includes the banking cartels, global

corporations, and the US Military as well as the governing elite of other super powers in the world. How would they