ZetaTalk: Government

does

not have ourselves, the Zetas, on his side, and his plans are known by the Puppet Master as soon as

conceived. Bush Co has stated they expect to win, had some magazines publish articles to this effect,

and are trying to suppress exit polls so the public will buy a fraud if they pull it off. Meanwhile, the

reality of their situation sits heavy upon them. Even with winning, the situation in Iraq is unraveling

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta337.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:22 AM]

ZetaTalk: Countering Fraud

so rapidly they fear retaining the military in the oil fields even if the Republicans retain Congress.

What lies ahead for them? Possible impeachment and criminal charges, and this means no

protection as ruler of the land when the pole shift hits. Thus, they have an immense number of

worries, and their faces show this.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta337.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:22 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gonzales Saga

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Gonzales Saga

written Mar 26, 2007

For Gonzales, More Records, and Questions [Mar 24]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/ An accumulating body of evidence is

at odds with the statements of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales that he

played little role in the deliberations over the dismissal of eight United

States attorneys. Mr. Gonzales has said he did not take part in any

discussions of the dismissal effort, and left the planning and execution of

the removals up to D. Kyle Sampson, his former chief of staff. But e-mail

messages and other documents released by the Justice Department in

recent days suggest that Mr. Gonzales was told of the dismissal plan on at

least two occasions, in 2005 when the plan was devised and again in late

2006 shortly before the firings were carried out.

We mentioned a year ago when the DoJ was investigating the NSA, and the FBI investigating the CIA, that Gonzales

was very worried about this own skin. He has been close to Bush long enough to know the likely outcome if and when

this presidency goes down. Watergate is an example. The President retired, and others went to prison. He is expected,

as a long term friend of Bush who has benefited immensely from his association with Bush to be loyal and facilitate

what Bush wants. On the other hand, he can see where his path is leading, and fears a prison term for himself.

Gonzales has been attempting to trip through the mine field, keeping his integrity, avoiding giving testimony under

oath in hopes that this muddies the water, avoiding direct responsibility for acts in hopes that this keeps him above the

fray, all the while remaining a loyal Bushie in the eyes of Bush as such rewards as a Supreme Court justice position

might lie in the future. Thus he has issued memos supporting torture, in the past, and been forced to defend his actions

when questioned by Congress. Taking a page from Bush, you assign an underling to take the hit, along the lines that

Cheney did with Libby. So when there are discussions about getting rid of Fitzgerald, whom Bush insisted should be

fired, or removing the US attorneys who went after Duke Cunningham or were investigating Fogo's CIA bribery

parties, then nervously give the nod, off the record, and leave the room!

Gonzales prevented Bush from firing Fitzgerald, something he angrily ordered ala Nixon, so where it looks as though

Rove and Miers were having their way, in fact Gonzales long let them have a few crumbs! Giving in under pressure,

he countered a promise to Congress, made under oath, to have all US Attorney's have Senate confirmation. Prior to the

promise and after, there were discussions at the White House on how they could merrily fire a bunch of them,

appointing whom they chose, with never an objection from Gonzales. It is this perjury that is the sticking point. Will

the truth out in Congressional hearings? Yes, but not because Bush or Rove or Miers confess, but because the email is

so convoluted that a trail can be laid out. As has been pointed out, it is often not the crime, but the handling of it that is

the coup de grac. Clinton was not impeached because of sex, but because of a lie about his dalliance. Nixon was

impeached because he attempted to obstruct justice, a coverup. Here, Gonzales has repeatedly made promises to

Congress that he has not kept, and had no intention of keeping. Was Gonzales at the helm, causing these firings? He

was certainly congnizant, and did nothing, apparently, to stop the process. The issue is intention or incompetence, and

he is unlikely to be excused based on incompetence. Thus impeachment by Congress is the hand writing on the wall

unless he resigns, which is likely.

ZetaTalk: GodlikeProduction Live, written May 13, 2006 on the live GodlikeProduction Radio show.

Q: Has Gonzales decided to go with integrity rather than what Bush wants him to do? The FBI is

investigating the CIA. The DoJ is investigating the NSA. Why doesn't Bush just tell Gonzales to stop

these investigations?

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta364.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:23 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gonzales Saga

You've got the jist of it. He worries about his own skin. He worries about what's going to happen