occurred
are proof that NASA lied, once again, and had
individuals watching with their scopes saw several explosions, but official images from space based observatories or
the observing probe itself stopped after the prepared story and reality parted ways.
The animation prepared well ahead of time, to be shown as though it was from space based views, did not match the
result, nor did the scripted commentary that the stunned scientists struggled to relay during the well advertised event.
They had no explanation for the series of explosions, and stuttered into silence, not daring to venture a guess as it
might counter the eventual official explanation. Debunking the theories now being floated is easy. One popular Internet
theory is that electrical currents within the comet, lightning in essence, created the flashes. If comets were so
electrified, wouldn't they be flashing as well as outgassing, regularly, as they encounter the debris in the solar system?
The NASA explanation is that portions of the rocky interior of the comet were under pressure and exploded. Again,
we point out that in the void of space, where expansion is not constrained, the comet would simply have broken into
pieces, without an explosion. For an explosion, there needs to be either fissionable or flammable material, and the only
such material available for that is what man would have delivered.
So what
simultaneous explosion, and the bundling needs to remain intact. Should either of these fail, the simultaneous
explosion fails, and both failed. NASA's failure rate is not laid out before the public, especially since the Columbia
unexpectedly disintegrated upon reentry, so that funding will not be questioned. Something as simple as a faulty rubber
ring, an O-Ring, can create a shuttle disaster for NASA, such is their track record. The bundled devices, tumbling in
one of the spins man is forever discounting and refusing to understand as they smugly assume they know
factors involved and their math describing such situations flawless, did not strike point on as expected. Thus, the initial
impact broke the bundle, and sent each nuclear device bouncing on it's own. Ricocheting about, these devices exploded
on the surface of the Dark Twin over time, independently as each finally aligned so that the tip of the device was the
strike point.
There is more than embarrassment at NASA today, who must explain the unexplainable, as the true mission did not
succeed. Assuming that large hunks of rock can be nudged into new orbits or trajectories, according to all the math
man holds so dear and proudly brags put man on the Moon so it must be accurate, they found otherwise. No change in
position occurred, whatsoever, and the orbits continue as before. Could it be that something
rules the Universe? Something akin to the Sweeping Arms of the Sun and particle flows coming back into the Sun at
her middle such that the planets are held in these flows, swept inward toward the Sun but held at bay by the Repulsion
Force? We have patiently demonstrated that the Moon is too large, and moving too slowly, to be held up above Earth
by Centrifugal Force alone, an obvious fact met by ridicule by smug mathematicians when debated in the past. Tisk.
Those too arrogant to learn are doomed to failure,
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta230.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:50 AM]
ZetaTalk: Deep Impact Result
Signs of the Times #1475
