ZetaTalk: Government

ZetaTalk: OperationTopOff

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Operation Topoff

Note: written during the May 10, 2003 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session

The past week has been a week of events, some natural, some political. Weather and quakes extremes have increased

to the extent that they have become undeniable, to any not brain dead. As we predicted, droughts and deluges, and

lineal increase in quakes to the extent that they would be more than subliminal tremors but noticed, has occurred. At

the same time, the unaided eye sightings occurred on schedule, as well as the Second Sun sightings, all registered on

photos for the public unable to get clear skies or a solid view to see. Nancy has, within the US, been given broad

coverage recently, on C2C and Gentile, on local radio stations, and beyond the interviews word of mouth is like wild

fire on the issue. As we have repeatedly stated, when ZetaTalk has success, the push back increases to meet this

success, a reason for allowing Nancy to stumble on occasion on minor issues like the Beatles, and to be so broke as to

be assumed unable to function by the arrogant rich who consider her a prime threat.

The issue came up last Saturday in chat as to whether the White House took credence in the May 15 to June 1 [Note: see

2003 Date explanation] time frame for serious rotation stoppage and pole shift to occur, and our answer was that they did not. So what changed, this past week, that

1. a May 4 announcement of the TopOff exercises, mobilizing 100 agencies nationwide and into Canada, and

2. a May 5 NASA web site article listing Nancy Lieder by name as well as Nibiru, debunking the issue of a

passage soon.

If one wanted to debunk, why not leave her name out of it, as undoubtedly the readership would locate the ZetaTalk

web site in Internet searches. Is this Good Cop/Bad Cop on the issues, both denying the truth while putting the spot

light on the prime spokesperson, Nancy? Yes! And what has occurred that this situation was quickly scrambled forth?

It has often been presented that human astrophysics simply does not consider the speed of approach of Planet X that

we have always asserted is possible, and that an orbit such as we have described from the start would occur. Yes,

NASA and JPL located the brown dwarf in 1983, estimated its size and distance, and then fell to holding their breath,

as they viewed any approach as outside of their lifetimes. Up until 1995, it was virtually in place, dithering at the

midpoint. When it began to move, the uptick was slow at first, then increasing in the last year or so to zoom into the

outer edges of the solar system. This was much ridiculed on sci.astro, as the rule is that any object approaching a solar

system at that speed would reach what humans call escape velocity, and never return. Since this was purported by the

ancients and geological evidence to be a repeater, they assumed such a speed would not occur, but it did.

When the speed was noted, the orbit was then clung to as a hope that a close passage would not occur, as human

astrophysics does not consider the Repulsion Force to exist as we have described it. Thus, they computed a straight

line through the solar system, far afield from a close passage to the Earth, and went about grabbing the oil fields in the

MidEast and other such more pressing issues. Recently, they have lost visibility, losing probes such as the Pioneer and

distracted by the loss of the Columbia. Other probes also were lost, unknown to the public. When the dust of

distraction cleared and fresh astronauts were placed on the Space Station, they set about triangulating again to examine

the orbit of Planet X. To their horror, its orbit was assuming what WE have always asserted! Thus, the sudden

adjustment to a possible May 15, or shortly thereafter, occurrence of severe panic in the populace was done.

In other words, if we have been right about the orbit and the speed, then we might be right about the date!

What adjustments were to be made, then, in an arrogant group of elite who assumed they had months to secure the

MidEast oil fields, to arrange to blow up bridges so the underclass in large cities would drown or die in quake and not

escape, and to block roads throughout the nations in this conspiracy to rule the world as kings afterwards so that only

http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g200.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:36 AM]

ZetaTalk: OperationTopOff

desireable workers survived to be enslaved.

Should they call Martial Law, in order to enforce blockades? This would be problematic IF our date proved

wrong, as Martial Law cannot be sustained for long in countries not used to these restrictions.

Should they fake terrorism attacks, as they planned to do on the anniversary of 911, or plant evidence as they

hoped to do prior to the invasion of Iraq? This has been so consistently stymied, by ourselves and others

working with the Council of Worlds, that they feared failure, another embarrassment like the faked nuclear

material memos provided to the UN prior to the Iraq invasion.

What was left? An exercise, to mobilize the agencies, the troops, and broad enough in scope and time that any

city finding roads blocked or troops about could be placated by the announcement that this was only part of the

exercise. After all, exercises must contain some unknowns, or the agencies to be exercises are not exercised!