ZetaTalk: Government

but this

culprit will not be the scapegoat. In the infamous attack on America on September 11, 2001, several unlikely

bedfellows crawled into bed with each other, each for their own ends. Thus, where on the surface it seems a repeat of

the Bin Laden attack on the World Trade Center in New York City, failed in the past and tried before the world in the

courts, this was only using as the bullet a Muslim group that would be immediately suspect and placate most inquiring

minds. The gun was held, however, by a rival bank of JP Morgan, who was devastated in the attack.

The Stock Markets and worth of so much paper the banks and wealthy rely upon for their status and control are being

artificially maintained at this time, the longer to keep these elite on their high perch. We mentioned in November, 1999

that cooperation between the world's banking giants and governments was in place, toward this end. One means of this

artificial support is to put forth losers, so that the general public might win and thus maintain their confidence to

continue to play the game that the Stock Markets represent. Key players are to enter the field and take a loss, aborting

panic, as this is considered a lesser problem than a full scale panic. Where this plan met with general approval, now

that tight times and a worldwide recession has become a reality, there is argument among the players. You go first, no

you go first, and these arguments have gotten heated. Many felt the time would never come, so agreement was only in

principal, not from the heart. Thus those in the financial field with greater clout, threatened to force lesser participants

to be the loser, and dark thoughts crossed many minds.

During the day of the attack, there were three things that stood out from the horror and stunned confusion that goes

with any unexpected catastrophe.

1. The first was the absence of the President from a role of confrontation and comfort. He was hiding, on the run,

not seen as in command, and took hours to even muster a presence other than a statement or two repeating the

obvious. It was clear to all that the Vice President, remaining in the White House, was running things. The lack

of leadership was so apparent that this was mentioned repeatedly by the newscasters.

2. The second was the repeated mention that such a well planned and executed attack had to have more than the

usual terrorist support, had to be supported by or in countries unnamed. Muslim pilots were trained in major

aircraft operations, undoubtedly in training simulation settings. Were they referring to Afghanistan, primitive and

suffering from drought so severe the people are starving? They were referring to a sophisticated country, with

the infrastructure capable of training Muslim pilots on the flight deck of these major commercial aircraft.

3. The third was that the CIA had been clueless, a trend of late but so complete a blackout had occurred that it

seemed beyond belief. Had this occurred in prior terrorist attacks? The terrorists were familiar enough with US

airport security and the routines and roles of the staff to be able to successfully commandeer four planes,

delivering the payload of three of them into the New York skyline and the Pentagon itself. No only was the CIA

in the dark, it seems the intel went in the other direction!

The heads of the US government were too frightened, the attack too well planned and executed, for this to be just a

terrorist attack. And JP Morgan affiliates resided on several floors of the World Trade Center and were a casualty of

the sudden devastation - executives, records, and confidence of the market and public in dealing with them going out

in a flash. The target was the banking systems holding the US and their elite and wealthy above those in Europe, in the

arrogant manner Bush and his masters have employed of late. To understand the main target, and the support

relationships causing a relative collapse among the wealthy and holdings of the US elite versus others, one needs to

know the complex and mostly secret relationships between bonding banks, new issue of stock, loans between banks

http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g127.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:03 AM]

ZetaTalk: Attack on America

and governments, agreements with the Fed, and who holds what holdings privately or publicly! JP Morgan was the

target, as a bank. The stock they were supporting, via their subsidiaries or associates, will suffer.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g127.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:03 AM]

ZetaTalk: London Bombing

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: London Bombing

written July 9, 2005

Interesting news again today in London. Wonder who stands to gain by this coordinated plan. [and from

another] What comment would the Zeta care to make on yesterday's grievous attack on London, ostensibly

by Islamic terrorists?

Reminiscent of 911 in the US, the bombing in London had numerous similarities.

Israel was aware of the potential of this, in both cases. In the US, Israeli citizens and associates were absent

from work on 911, as though forewarned. This was the only group so absent in the WTC on 911. In London,

press releases indicated that the Israeli Finance Minister was warned ahead of the first attack, which presumably

took all by surprise. Again, this was the only group so forewarned. What is to be made of this pattern?

Add to this the pattern of financial transactions, insiders pulling out of airline stocks just ahead of 911, and