ZetaTalk: Myths

Like cults, Scientology demands loyalty based on the

followers emotional dependence and the leaders desire for complete control over the followers.

Scientology is a cult, but gets away with having an audience among those who don't know the organization or its reputation due to the inclusion of the word science in its name. Move past the name and all relationship to science disappears. It is an unscientific organization. Science implies a thought process, pondering the evidence and testing theories against the results of experiment. Since Scientology denies its members the right to think, instead dictating to them what they should believe, it not only has no relationship to science, it also blocks its members from attempting to follow scientific principles.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/myths/m41.htm[2/5/2012 1:33:28 PM]

ZetaTalk: Clonaid

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Clonaid

Note: written during the Dec 28, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.

Cloning, as with the Sheep Dolly, is not difficult. The difficulty is having a 100% success, such that no one can claim an injury has occurred. Childbirth, conception, and having a healthy baby is not guaranteed even under normal

circumstances. However, parents who proceed and have a damaged child normally do not have a right to sue, or

complain, unless clear malpractice by the doctor or hospital occurred. If it is a genetic toss of the dice, then no

complaints are filed. Cloning should, theoretically, produce an offspring identical to the parents, but what if all the DNA does not transfer, or during early development expresses differently because of a different early environment? A

leg not forming, as the nudge to do so is not there, the DNA perfect but the nudge lacking. Thus, cloned human infants are being developed, have been developed, but until the product is certain, no publicity will be forthcoming. Those making the most noise, however, have not, themselves, done this cloning. They are seeking the spotlight, and have secured it, as no court in the land can force them to produce something protected under doctor/patient laws. Before

court orders can ensue, an injury must be produced. Was a law broken? No law for human cloning exists that would

put the claimants in jail, certainly not without proof of their actions. Thus, their strutting on stage is safe.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/myths/m75.htm[2/5/2012 1:33:29 PM]

ZetaTalk: Bon

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Bon

Note: written on Oct 15, 1995

The ancient Chinese had a tradition of worshipping their dead ancestors that went beyond respect and honorable

mention. They ate their dead. This type of cannibalism is not unknown in other cultures, as primitive man has often

concluded that one could ingest the qualities of another - courage, potency, or intelligence. However, the ancient

Chinese did this not to capture qualities but to protect the souls of their ancestors from what they considered to be

preying evil spirits. Their traditions of caring for one another knew no bounds, and failure to partake of the meal was considered gross disrespect. All but the bones were consumed, and these carefully bound and kept in a safe place. Over time this was taken to be, by those who discovered these bundles, an odd burial practice. What has passed forward as

Chinese tradition, unaltered, is the sense that the spirit lives on and can inhabit a body other than the birth body - a walk-in. The foreboding sense that one needs protection from evil spirits is still about, reflected in the curved roofs which are to catch and fling back to the skies any evil spirits dropping down to plague mankind, or so they hoped.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/myths/m07.htm[2/5/2012 1:33:29 PM]

ZetaTalk: Divine Nectar

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Divine Nectar

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995

A falsehood promulgated by Yogis is that they nourish themselves not with the same food and water required by mere

humans whom they would lead, but by the absorption of light energy, called Divine Nectar. This is a falsehood

difficult for the follower to disprove, as to put in place the controls necessary to disprove the proposition, the follower would have to highly insult the master. Do they have a bite to eat in their private quarters, or slip a nibble into their mouths now and then during the day, from under their flowing robes? Who can be certain? There has been no

controlled study on this matter, and the reader can be assured that if humans had even a slight inclination in this

direction that the massive starvation and malnutrition that occurs all over the Earth, without abatement throughout

human history, would have produced at least one human who seemed to thrive without food.

A controlled experiment to disprove the proposition would require that a Yogi master:

be willing to undergo such a test

be placed in an isolated situation where the only input to his system would be the light claimed to nourish

be observed continuously by people who are not the Yogi Master's followers and who therefore do not have

preconceived opinions on the outcome

No such controlled test has ever been done, and for good reasons - the proposition would be disproved.

Why do Yogi Masters purport that this practice works? What's in it for them? India is a country where starvation and

malnutrition are on the rise, and have always been a grim fact of life for all but the privileged classes. The cast systems are rigid, and there is scant hope of escaping. Some Yogis purport that this practice succeeds to give hope to the

pitiful, and some have even convinced themselves that they feel refreshed after basking, but most do so simply to raise their status among their followers. How great is their master? He has mastery over Divine Nectar, or so he says.

All rights reserved: [email protected]