Therefore, this option, which the Service-to-Self take without hesitation, is not an open option at all.
The Service-to-Self entity will then proceed to attempt to disable the attack, by diverting the attack onto another or
some sort of diversionary tactic.
Offering up another victim, the one least likely to have defenses or retaliate against the entity selecting them, is tried first. Should this be a situation where the resulting attacks from the substitute victim are anticipated to be as bad as the original attack, this ploy is abandoned. Distraction is tried. The victim may attempt to start a fire, literally and
figuratively. The child anticipating a deadline at school, for which he is unprepared, may foist a bomb scare on the
school to buy time. The dog ate my homework, an excuse often used by all, is not the route taken by the Service-to-
Self youngster, who would prefer to cause distress and chaos for the power trip this elicits. For those not oriented to Service-to-Self, diversionary tactics, where they exist and are acceptable, will have already been taken. If the victim cannot escape, they may point to the side, hoping to distract the attacker. This seldom works, or when it does, seldom
works for long. The victim, having been chosen because he or she is helpless, is like a mouse in a box.
Is there nothing the victim can do?
The reader may have noted that there has been much discussion about Service-to-Self maneuvers. We have brought
this forth in this discussion for a reason. Service-to-Self entities, seeking to gain converts to their orientation which they deem will be under their domination, use fear and resentment situations to gain converts. In the situations
http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o09.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:01 AM]
ZetaTalk: When Under Attack
described above, the entity not oriented toward Service-to-Self will be torn. Should they take the option used with
success by others? Should they counter intimidate, toss another victim into the mouth of the attacker, or cause a chaotic situation with unpredictable and perhaps regrettable results? They decide not. Some decide to try these tactics, and
draw themselves toward an orientation where victimization and perpetration are the name of the game. The psychology
at play in prisons, or in slum areas where gangs emerge, show what happens to victims who take this route. They are
caught, the way back fraught with greater victimization than the original situation they sought to escape.
What does this leave the entity who does not wish to enter the Service-to-Self game? Where love is the answer, this
has been tried. Where the victim is dealing with a hardened Service-to-Self entity, such tactics only bring forth a
cynical laugh. Escape is not possible. Appeal to authorities non-existent or tried and failed. Diversion tried and failed.
The strength of the victim not enough to counter the threatened attack, whether the attack is physical or psychological.
What does the victim do? In this case they are best counseled to keep their eye on the horizon, the long term, and bear in mind that any situation of victimization must end, if only in death. We are saying, do not give in to the urge to get the upper hand by adopting the tactics of the Service-to-Self crowd. Gain the upper hand by stoicism. This robs the
attacker of his goal, his reward.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o09.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:01 AM]
PeopleTalk: In the Hands of Man
Mail this Pageto a Friend.