ZetaTalk: Orientation

oriented barons who run these businesses, who cannot be bothered to consider the pain they are causing if it takes a minute out of their day or a penny from their pocket.

However, those concerned for animal rights are not necessarily operating fully in the Service-to-Others, where they think of others at least as often as they think of themselves. The true test of orientation comes when the entity must

make a choice between themselves and another. Under conditions where caring for another is not truly a sacrifice, but perhaps merely an inconvenience or even a pleasure, a true test has not occurred. Caring for pets is almost never a true test, as they are kept for the fun factor, not because they are a burden. They romp with or otherwise amuse their

owners, are an extension of their owners egos, and build a sense of power in the pet owner due to the master-slave

relationship. Caring for pets is a safe Service-to-Other practice, one where the human holds all the cards, and thus not a true test of the decision to care for others on an equal basis with caring for the self.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o48.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:08 AM]

ZetaTalk: Original Sin

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Original Sin

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995

An age old issue - one that comes up in religious circles, on original sin. Humanity is viewed in its various life

situations. The babe born into a wealthy household, its every care attended to. Contrast this with the babe born into

squalor, where the food is inadequate but worse than that is the neglect by its caretakers and the battering rage that

swirls all about. Are these babes equally innocent? Is karma at play here? We feel we need an explanation for the

differences, and seek to find this. We are made uncomfortable, seeing the babe in distress, and are in a dilemma.

Should we neglect the self, step away from our busy life to attend to the needs of another? Should we get involved,

when our offer to assist may be viewed by an angry person as interference? To comfort ourselves, we tell ourselves

that the victim brought this upon him or her self.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o07.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:08 AM]

ZetaTalk: Sin

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Sin

Note: written Aug 15, 1995

One of the tools used by the religious elite to keep their minions in control is the concept of sin, by which they keep everybody nervous and hold the key to salvation. The rules, such as the 10 Commandments, which guide these matters

are almost entirely focused on actions not to be taken and how to stay in line. Apparently, immobilized, the devout will be thus saved from damnation. Who benefits from this? Those in positions of authority within the Service-to-Self

orientation, both human and alien. It is no accident that Church and State are frequently allied. Both want to control, to limit independent thought and action, to focus attention away from freedoms by describing the dangers therein. How

does this benefit the Service-to-Self? In two ways.

First, when humans are concerned more about following the rules and limiting repercussions, they are not thinking about how to help others. One need only be in a crowded theater when fire breaks out or on a sinking ship to see what

happens to humans when eminent danger is near. Panic, fear, me first, and all thought of helping others is put aside

until the self is safe and secure. It is the rare person, the exception, who thinks of others in these situations, as the treatment and attention these heroes receive attests. They are given awards, even post humus. How does the concept of

sin, as publicized by the religious elite, serve the Service-to-Self? By limiting concern for others.

Second, when humans structure themselves around a set of rules they are giving power and authority to those who set the rules and, in essence, giving themselves as possessions to those who set the rules. They are owned. They are not

free. Blind obedience does not entail any options or qualifications. Blind obedience is not what occurs when someone

runs a red light in an emergency, knowing that Stop and Go lights are simply a practical way of preventing collisions

at intersections. Blind obedience occurs when the flock follows the rules, so as not to sin, and lets the religious elite rule on when infractions have occurred. Who will be the judge? Not God, but those who own and possess the sinner.

This is all practice for life in the full-blown Service-to-Self orientation, during 4th Density. There the pecking order is rigidly established and the rules by which one may be punished are utterly arbitrary. The strong, who set the rules, deciding not only what rules should be established but when infractions occur. Rather than going to Hell because one

sinned, one tends to go to Hell because one worries so very much about sinning.

Rather than focus on the rules, humans would do well to focus on whether their behavior is helping or hurting others -

the true importance of their actions.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o24.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:09 AM]

ZetaTalk: The Good Book

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: The Good Book

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995

A number of times we, the Zetas, and others have discussed how the founders of the great religions on Earth, such as

Jesus as the founder of Christianity or Mohammed as the founder of Islam, were themselves incarnated spirits from

higher realms who attempted to reach mankind through their repeated counsel to the masses. Jesus and Mohammed

took care to repeat their verbal messages because of the tendency of such messages to be distorted and turned from

their original meaning. Nevertheless, their messages did get twisted in the Bible and Koran.

How did this happen?