and a

determination not to repeat the action.

The witness, who has an opportunity to step in, at risk to self, and thus can experience the empowerment of

group action toward good, or the diminishment of empowerment from being intimidated.

All these are opportunities for growth, in one direction or the other, and this is the major lesson of 3rd Density.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o13.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:12 AM]

ZetaTalk: Aggression

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Aggression

Note: written May 15, 1997

A common misperception among humans is the assumption that higher spiritual densities are removed from any

emotion except love, and have no destructive urges. The matter of being Service-to-Other does not entail removing oneself from the many conflicts that present during incarnated life. The point where one defends the self, or others,

and crosses the line into destructive behavior is not the point where the entity becomes, however briefly, oriented in Service-to-Self. Service-to-Others does not mean allowing the other to proceed without bounds in a manner that hurts

the self. Self defense is not only assumed, it is desirable! Any entity that became utterly passive and failed to defend itself would not last long. Self defense is integral in any life form, and can hardly be removed, nor should it be.

There is much confusion regarding defensive or aggressive actions being taken by those operating in the Service-to-

Other orientation. Empathy toward others and non-violent means of attending to life’s daily affairs are assumed, and

under equitable conditions this is the norm. However, if others who are not firmly in the Service-to-Other orientation or even if others also in the Service to-Other group are undertaking actions that threaten the well being of the self or of the group, aggressive and even violent means are not out of keeping with the Service-to-Other orientation! Forcefully

restraining another, or even killing them if this is the most effective solution, is not only a Service-to-Self perogative.

These are solutions open to those in the Service-to-Other also.

In dealing with, for instance, a sadist preying upon the young, an inability to safeguard the young by any other means

than killing the sadist would not be out of keeping with the Service-to-Other philosophy. Which other is being served

by allowing him to continue? The young children, as a group of others, or the sadist as a single individual utterly

lacking in consideration of others? The choice is clear, and killing the sadist a solution involving empathy and

kindness overall. In fact, allowing the sadist to continue is anti Service-to-Other, as this passivity is making those standing by and doing nothing a party to the sadism.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o49.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:12 AM]

ZetaTalk: Turn the Other Cheek

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Turn the Other Cheek

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995

What should be done when a human finds they are being victimized, for whatever reason? Most certainly they should

not simply cry 'Pity me' and do nothing! Much has been made of the Christian adage, turn the other cheek. In India, it is much touted that the British were routed because Ghandi engaged them with passive resistance. Does this ploy not

work? Sometimes. In the main, this ploy does not work. Passive resistance, or returning violence with love, works only in the circumstances where the attacker is basically of a good heart. The soldier ordered to press forward, for

instance, where he personally has misgivings. Where former victims are inciting violence, here the protagonist drawn

into a conflict may find they can turn the situation around, to where injuries are addressed rather than conflict

escalated, by returning love for antagonism.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o11.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:13 AM]

ZetaTalk: Good Samaritan

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Good Samaritan

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995

Where the victim has carried resentment forward into a fresh situation, with uninvolved spectators who have no

knowledge of and certainly no guilt toward the victim's plight, a Good Samaritan dilemma may develop where the

victim attacks his rescuers blindly. How does this play out? Who is to blame here? Where should the finger of blame,

which in much of human society must point somewhere, point? The solution is to realize that there are two victims in

this situation. This is a theme often enough played in your media - the good Samaritan caught in a cycle of violence,

the healer who must struggle with demons brought forth by his good intentions.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o10.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:14 AM]

ZetaTalk: Trust

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Trust

Note: written Feb 15, 1997

Trust among the trustworthy is a marvelous life, as one goes about one's work not concerned whether what others

promised will be forthcoming, as they are trustworthy. This is a highly productive environment, with each

Вы читаете ZetaTalk: Orientation
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату