ZetaTalk: Pole Shift

and at the

end of the cycle.

By gripping the Atlantic Rift, the cause of the Global Quakes that have racked the Earth for over a year, Planet X is

creating a slow continental drift. The Atlantic Rift is held back when it faces or is in opposition to Planet X, creating

not only a pile up in the plates following the rift, but also tearing apart the rift by the momentum to the East. This

process continues during whiplash, but what is the effect on the plates on either side of the rift when a void is created?

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta94.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:58 AM]

ZetaTalk: Torque Effect

There is a slide into the void, on the side experiencing a pileup, and thus the N American Plate is dropping into the

void, relieving the stress of compression along its northern border in the Arctic by a torque to the side as it does so.

During the pileup in the Pacific, the Indio-Australian Plate is being jammed under the Himalayans, causing this plate

to drop and creating another void in the Indian Ocean. This is the cause of the African Rift, and this great continent

once again is pulled into the void, thus the recent noticeable stress in the region of the African Rift.

The overall effect of this drift, which will increase in speed and force as the whiplash proceeds, will be a torque. Hold

the globe with the left hand on the N Pole, the right hand on the S Pole, and turn in opposite directions first this way,

then back. The N Pole going in the direction of rotation with the S Pole held back, the torque forces the N American

Plate down and into the Caribbean, East moving in the direction of SE. The S Pole pulled back by a grab on the

Atlantic Rift in the Southern Hemisphere with the N Pole held rigid has the Indo-Australian Plate plunging under the

Himalayas and Africa likewise plunging into the void, again East turning to SE. This does more than sink the SE

United States and pull apart the African Rift, it pulls the entire oil rich Middle East into a skew. How is it that all that

oil dropped into the cracks in the rock in that region, eons ago, during prior pole shifts? The rock was shattered, during

just such torque maneuvers. Thus, where we stated that something would occur to pull victory from the jaws of the

Bush/Blair coalition before the pole shift, something that would take the breath out of the body it would be so dramatic

and unexpected, this region is ripe to present many surprises to those who would be kings in the Aftertime.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta94.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:58 AM]

ZetaTalk: Magma Slam

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Magma Slam

written Dec 28, 2004

Last year at Xmas, Iran had a quake and on the exact opposite of the globe (drawing a line thru the earth),

we had a large earthquake, as if one side affected the other. Do you think we can expect this again? [and

from another] Last year we had the huge quake in iran and I felt the big quake in Panama while in Costa

Rica. Now this monster at the same time of year. [and from another] I get it now. They're going to use the

recent 9.2 earthquake alone to explain the wobbling of the earth and the coming shortening daylight.

We have stated that recent Weather Wobbles were caused by an increasingly violent Polar Wobble, where the N. Pole of Earth is pushed away from the emerging N. Pole of Planet X as it swings about in place. We hinted that more than

sudden windstorms would occur, but as we are obliged by the Rule of Non-Interference not to warn mankind of

coming earthquakes, could not be specific. Are the recent strong quakes along the Indio/Australia plate one such

result? Most certainly, only the Russians being honest about it as the cover-up attempts to hold together and explain

the Earth’s reactions to this strong quake. A Russian scientist reports that the quakes were the result of a change in the

Earth’s spin, an honest admission. JPL phrases the cause and effect such that a slowing rotation will result from the

quake. The quake caused the orbit and rotation of the Earth to change? Did such a thing happen after the Great Lisbon

quake or the Alaskan quake in 1964? Did the leap second calculation change then? Slowing rotation, and a globe

tipping on its axis, now to be blamed on earthquakes? The question then to be asked, is what caused the earthquake?

Global wobbles followed both the Tasmanian quake and increased after the Sumatra quake, showing that the magma

flow was irregular after the quakes. These wobbles also resulted after Dec 25, 2003 when the Earth halted in her orbit, encountering Planet X. Could irregular pressure in the magma also be causing these quakes? We have explained that

the globe would be put under pressure as the N. Pole was pushed away into 3 Days of Darkness for the northern

hemisphere, due to the rotation of the globe both wanting to remain centered between the geographic poles and

wanting to align with the Sun’s rotation. We have described the rotation of the Earth as being driven by parts of the

core and non-homogeneous magma pulling toward or racing away from elements in the solar system or Universe.

Where the Earth is being jerked about by the presence of Planet X and it’s temporary magnetic alignment along the

Sun’s magnetic flow lines, these elements remain implacable, unchanged. Thus, as with the Pole Shift itself, the

hapless Earth is being given conflicting directives. During the Pole Shift, the core wants to align with the