Nov- Hale-Bopp = Sagittarius unmapped stars

95

(Talking about the nova.) A late summer ESO report stated as clearly as the ESO dared that Hale-Bopp was not

a comet, based on the lack of comet emissions and expansive behavior. They did not publish the many

concurrent findings that demonstrated that Hale-Bopp is an exploding star.

18-

May- Hale-Bopp = star clusters or black space

96

(Talking about the nova.) Why did the various major observatories around the world assume the head of Hale-

Bopp to be various different things - a dark area, a bright spot, a dark areas to the side of a bright spot - all

while the head was the basis of the supposed orbit tracking? Why was it necessary for the IAU to toss out 90%

of the data submitted to it for the announced orbit to be found to be correct? Is this science, that the assumption

overrules the data?

17-

Jun- Hale-Bopp = real comet #1

96

Take a check on where all these almost daily changes in the ephemerides are leading, astronomers of the world,

as they are leading right to where a face saving comet that's a real comet is coming from. They plan to hide

Hale-Bopp behind a real comet. What comet, ever, has had this kind of manipulation in its orbit?

9-

Jul- Hale-Bopp = real comet #1

96

All roads seem to lead to Gamma Andromedae, where this does not logically follow! They would marry their

fraud, Hale-Bopp, with a double star, Gamma Andromedae, and what a glorious perihelion that would be! This

required manipulation of the orbit such that it moved away from Jupiter, rather than being perturbed toward the

giant!

16-

Nov- Hale-Bopp = behind the Sun

96

Hoagland's early conclusion that what NASA was calling Hale-Bopp was an object under intelligent control

gave the conspirators a way out. Those who have spread this gossip are all firmly in the palm of the

conspirators, cooperating.

24-

Nov- Hale-Bopp = behind the Sun

96

We predict that the single individual, the NASA Principal Investigator who has been given exclusive rights to

Hubble pictures of Hale-Bopp, will come forward and grant the public a look at these prizes. However, these

pictures will be of times long past.

1-

Dec- Hale-Bopp = behind the Sun

96

It zigs and zags without any astronomical reason, perturbing away form Jupiter, having its turnaround at

perihelion tightening, all unexplained by the orbit plotters. Along the way they have also lined their fraud up

with star clusters and when the orbit was in the comet belt, with faint peripheral comets that JPL and NASA

spied with their equipment.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p46.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:17 AM]

ZetaTalk: Hale-Bopp

20-

Jan- Hale-Bopp = real comet #2

97

Is it not supposed to be a glorious panorama across the sky at this point? Is it not to take the breath of the

beholder away at this point? The comet of the millennium? A comet of such massive proportions that it was

outbursting out past Jupiter?

5-

Mar- Hale-Bopp = real comet #2

97

It is not what was advertised and pointed to in 1995. It is not what folks were advised to track through

Sagittarius in late 1995. It is not what folks were struggling to see in early 1996, nor the brief alignment of a

comet in June-July of 1996. It is not the many star clusters that the Hale-Bopp orbit was aligned with during its

twists and turns that broke all the rules of Orbital Elements and have never been explained by JPL. And it will

prove not to be what has been billed for Hale-Bopp at perihelion. Imagine what you might see with the Hubble,

above the atmosphere which clouds mankind's view of his Solar System. Imagine what information is received

by the NEAT program. Comets are so many gnats in the sky that NASA and JPL fail to report as they are

forbidden to take advantage of their superior view in this matter.

Вы читаете ZetaTalk: Pole Shift
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату