ZetaTalk: Science

developed in

early 2004 and tracked by Nancy and friends until mid-2005 seems gone, it has been replaced by another phenomena more akin to a lurch. If the former Figure 8 wobble involved Planet X grabbing at the highly magnetized Atlantic Rift

and pushing at the N Pole, what's changed?

An unexpected result from the data gathering Nancy and friends did was the finding that the lurch of the N Pole away

from the Sun and Planet X was occurring during the hours when the N Pole of Earth was hidden by the curve of the

Earth. If the N Pole of Planet X is swinging to point toward Earth, hosing magnetic particles toward Earth, then

wouldn't this push logically happen when the N Pole of Earth is facing Planet X directly? N Poles repulse each other.

The answer to this puzzle lies in the way large magnets interact with each other, wanting to either line up end to end or side by side, sharing the same magnetic field, or when unable to achieve either of these positions, to have the minor

magnet nose in at a right angle. When Planet X draws close enough to the Earth to tip the N Pole of Earth away,

causing Earth to lay on her side in a Lean to the Left and then roll into the 3 days of darkness foretold, the N Pole of Planet X will be pointing directly at Earth. This is not yet the case.

We have described the process of the 270° roll as Planet X swings its N Pole around toward Earth in a retrograde,

clockwise, manner. At the current date, this has progressed approximately 137°, not yet pointing the N Pole of Earth directly at Earth, who lies to the left, caught in the cup of the eddy flow from the particles flowing around the sides of

Planet X. In this position, does the Earth align end to end with Planet X or side by side? As with all the planets in the

solar system, which align side by side with the Sun, the dominant magnet, Earth choses the path of least resistance. It can take a temporary side by side with Planet X, which then lays the earth out in the manner discovered during the

pre-dawn hours for the Americas on Feb 28 and Mar 7. This side by side alignment happened, also, at a time when the

magnetic hot spots on Earth were hidden from view, reducing contention with the Sun's magnetic dictates. The N Pole

of Earth is over the curve of the Earth. The highly magnetized Atlantic Rift is just coming into view on the Western

horizon. Where the constellation view in the Americas during such a time, just before dawn, would show a dramatic

lean toward the West, the sunball over Europe and Africa would only show a Sun moving from a Southern to a more

Eastern position during these hours, then quickly traveling toward the West again. If the Sun's rays are beaming down,

how many people bother to note the exact position of the Sun in its arc across the sky during the mid- morning hours?

What of the temporary or intermittent aspect of this lean? Nancy noted no aberrant constellation alignment when she

checked on Mar 10 in the same time frame that Chili and Cincinnati had noted an extreme lean. How is this possible?

We mentioned when the topic of the 270° roll was raised during the live chats on Jan 13 and Feb 3 that Planet X is simultaneously rising to the Ecliptic and turning in place to point it's N Pole outward from the Sun. We mentioned that

rising to the Ecliptic, for Planet X, means that the hose of magnetic particles streaming out of its N Pole encounters a

blast of backwash of particles returning to the Sun's middle at the Ecliptic. If Planet X can envelope the Earth in its

magnetic field when the Earth's magnetic hot spots are hidden from view, but not when they present, then this grip, at

its present distance from Earth and its present progress in its 270° roll, is tenuous. Rising a bit more toward the

Ecliptic, and encountering a stronger headwind in the backwash of returning particles, is all it takes to trip the balance

back to where the Earth aligns with the Sun's magnetic field instead. What this intermittent lean to the West is

showing is the type of gyrations the Earth will undergo as Planet X continues its steady path in the direction of Earth.

Things will not be normal, and sudden adjustments will occur.

What does this new intermittent phenomena, replacing the former Figure 8 wobble, tell mankind? That Planet X has

progressed in its 270° roll or it would not be in a position to demand a temporary side-by-side alignment. That Planet

X has moved closer or it would not have the strength to demand a side-by-side alignment. That Planet X is steadily

rising toward the Ecliptic or the phenomena would not be countered by the backwash of particles at the Ecliptic. Given

these points, that Planet X will be able to impose the 3 days of darkness on Earth when it turns its N Pole hose directly

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta360.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:10 AM]

ZetaTalk: Intermittent Lurch

at Earth. For those wanting to know how much time we have before the press of the last weeks are upon them, we

repeat. No date will be given until the establishment shares with the populace what they know about the approaching

monster. If they, in their elite perch, are privy to information from the Hubble and probes and observatories, then the

least of those among the citizenry deserves the same information. Information is power, and the establishment plans to

use their privy information to harm the common man, not help them as is their obligation. Thus, no date will be given

until the establishment places the common man on their level, and they themselves are on the level of the common

man.

ZetaTalk: Live Chat, written Jan 13, 2007

ZetaTalk: Live Chat, written Feb 3, 2007

The speed of movement through the 270°

roll is not linear. … Another aspect is

We reported recently that Planet X was

the elevation to the Ecliptic, as when

at the 135 degree point. This is not a