ZetaTalk: Science

would it not? If a man walks in a forward motion only, he will arrive faster than another who takes the time to dance

to the side, this way or that, now and then.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s108.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:15 AM]

ZetaTalk: Orbital Plane

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Orbital Plane

Note: written on Apr 15, 1996.

Planets orbiting a sun invariably line up into an orbital plane, looking a bit, if one were to speed up the process, like a

flying saucer. Why would this be so, and is there a relationship to the shape that solar systems take and the familiar

shape of our ships? There is indeed a relationship, as what is termed the flying saucer is shaped to simulate the gravity

dynamics of a solar system so that it can become its own little solar system when instigating its own gravity field. A

flying saucer in motion can turn sideways or upside down, and the passengers are unaffected. They are, gravity-wise,

in their own little world. Solar systems do not take this shape by accident, though there is no comparable effect on

Earth for man to study and point to. Gaseous planets, such as Saturn, have rings in a plane, but nothing orbiting the

Earth, man-made or otherwise, is so affected.

The planets are lined up in a plane not because of anything inherent in themselves, but because of a drama that is

taking place in their sun. All suns, being hot and therefore liquid or vaporous in the main, rotate, and do so for the

same reasons that the Earth rotates - parts of the core are seeking to escape this or that side of the Universe, and due to

the motion of rotation that this escape attempt initiates, these same parts find themselves back where they started from,

not having any brakes as it were in a liquid or vaporous environment. The Sun's influence on its planets is more than

light, more than the solar wind in all its components, more than the magnetic field it generates which reaches out

beyond the planets. The Sun's rotation reflects the influences on it, those parts of the Universe that exert a gravitational pull or a magnetic clash, or if there are other large bodies close enough, a repulsion force.

A sun's rotation does not just happen, it begins due to attraction or repulsion. This is what begins the motion. A sun's rotation reflects this, and whatever rotation institutes within the sun has a dominant effect on the planets that are about

the sun. Why do the planets not orbit in all directions? Logically, if there were no enforcement, it would be chance, yet

it seems instead to be the rule. A sun's rotation indicates where the dominant forces are on the sun, and these dominant

forces effect more than the sun. They rule the planets too, pulling and pushing on them, as well. But beyond these

outside influences, the rotation of a sun has an effect on her planets, as the streams within her core, being uneven in

their composition, pull and push on the planets as they may be susceptible to these forces. Thus, coalescing planets

may not start out all in a line, but as they are pushed and pulled they tend to move as far or as near as they can get, and in the end, are in a line with the sun's moving parts, as this is where far and near lie.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s64.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:16 AM]

ZetaTalk: Binary Orbits

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Binary Orbits

Note: written on Nov 15, 1995.

How often do planets, such as your Sun's 12th Planet, take up an orbit around two suns rather than remaining

dedicated to one sun. Rarely, as this requires the wanderer to be large enough that a strong repulsion force develops

when it approaches one of the suns and to also have congealed after a big bang in such a position between the two

suns that this binary orbit ensues. If close to one sun it will settle into the normal orbit around this single sun. But if

fairly equidistant it will approach one sun with comet like speed and return in the same direction, as comets do, to

begin its binary orbit.

Are such binary orbits always disruptive to life on planets orbiting one or the other of the suns? Most certainly,

depending upon the placement of the planets, angle of entry into the planetary orbital plane, and relative size of the

wanderer. If the wanderer is small, its action is like a comet. If the wanderer is larger than planets it passes, then

scenarios such as pole shifts can potentially occur. This likelihood is further reduced by the magnetic potential, which

is strong or weak depending on the composition of the planets and wanderer. This potential is further weakened by the

relative number of life bearing planets that are dry land planets, as most life bearing planets are water planets. Life in the water, during earthquakes, is not traumatized to the degree that life on land is traumatized. Water cushions any

trajectories by braking the speed.

Thus the periodic trauma your Earth undergoes as a life bearing planet is quite unusual. Where this happens elsewhere

in the Universe the inhabitants have reacted much as humans have - with denial beforehand and deliberate amnesia

afterwards. In this, you are typical.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s42.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:16 AM]