object now is pointed toward the giant. This is a significant turning point, no pun intended, as from this point

forward the object now finds that its linear momentum and its gravity drop are combined, and thus, with this

combined force, it ends up heading straight down.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s59.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:19 AM]

ZetaTalk: Oort Cloud

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Oort Cloud

Note: written on Jan 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Ah, the theoretical Oort Cloud. As with the mythical Quark - give it a name and it becomes real. It is not real. Humans

assume that comets just happen along, and sometimes get caught in a repeating cycle. Humans speculate on the origin

of comets. The majority of comets visiting your Solar System return because they originated here, during planetary

breakups caused by the periodic passage of the 12th Planet, for one. Look to the nature of your Solar System, the

composition and shape of the planets. How would irregularly shaped chunks of ice, which in essence comets are,

begin? The Earth was once a water planet, but lost much of her water following a collision with a traveling moon of

the 12th Planet. Where do you suppose her waters went?

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s51.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:19 AM]

ZetaTalk: Repeating Comets

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Repeating Comets

Note: written on Jan 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Repeating comets are attracted to the Sun, are heading for it, but miss due to the same sensitivity to the solar wind that

causes their dust clouds and gasses to blow away from the Sun. Humans assume that tiny particles will be more

affected by the solar wind than larger particles, but this assumption is wrong. If this were the case, then how to explain

the Asteroid Belt, which has trash of all sizes, seemingly unaffected by the solar wind. A small object may lose its

velocity faster than a larger object, due to the gravitational differences, but the effect is the same when they are

sensitive to the solar wind - they are pushed away. Comets that hit the Sun have, through repeated trips around the Sun,

lost enough water vapor so that the balance of their composition weighs against repulsion by the solar wind. In short,

they've lost their protection. They come zooming in from outer space, but this time, they don't veer out, they collide. In fact, comets close their orbits, coming closer and closer to the Sun, during this process.

Where a repelling force exists, such as the solar wind against a comet, the comet will veer out upon approach and as it

gains speed coming into the Solar System, veer in again. The increasing speed of comets allows them to push past their

sensitivity to the solar wind, to some degree. Thus they have a quick trip around the Sun while held at the distance

where they are essentially getting a blast of wind they cannot proceed against.

The solar wind is steady, its change incremental, as with every measure closer the intensity increases by a similar

steady measure. The length away that the comet maintains is not explained by an analogy such as a car hitting a brick

wall or a diver entering the water or even a man walking into a hurricane. The comet is slipping to the side as it

approaches, going in the direction of least pressure, of least resistance, while still aiming for the Sun. The point where

this balance is reached is dependent on the speed of the comet, which increases steadily the closer it gets to the Sun,

and the intensity of the blast from the solar wind. At every point along its orbit, these determinators are at play. When

out in space the comet's pace is relatively sedate, and thus slides to the side rather than approaching the Sun directly.

When it enters your Solar System the reverse is occurring - the speed effect overcoming the solar wind push, so that

the comet curves toward the Sun, but always these two factors are at play.

Quite clearly some comets are periodic, as they appear regularly after a set number of years, approach from the same

direction, turn around within the Solar System at the same place, exit the Solar System in the same direction, and give

the same predictable appearance. But comets that have a long period have been documented in the past in a manner

that leaves much doubt. Where astronomers within this very millennium assumed the Sun orbited the Earth, just how

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s50.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:21 AM]

ZetaTalk: Repeating Comets

accurate can their records have been? And how does one know that a previous comet is returning, even when it

approaches from the same direction? Is it not possible to have more than one comet with the same track through the

Solar System? Humans are barely out of the Dark Ages, and if honest would admit that they are guessing. Do they

have these comets marked? Do they have an accurate basis of comparison? What are they judging on, the pencil sketch

made by someone in antiquity?

Вы читаете ZetaTalk: Science
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату