ZetaTalk: Science

stress, pre-shock to the earthquake that was recorded during the Tunguska explosion.

2. Methane gas mixes with the air as it rises, followed by more hissing air, so that a huge cloud of methane has

formed in the atmosphere over Tunguska, equivalent to all the natural gas at any given time in the US.

3. A wick of methane that has drifted upward and southeast, driven by the prevailing westerlies, is sparked due to

the air movement, the same process that causes lighting due to rapid air movement during storms.

4. The lit methane burns rapidly back along the wick, the 'meteor' that was seen, lights all the gas that is

encountered but before all but the nearest witnesses can see it, those who died in the explosion, an overburn over

gasses closer to the surface prevents heat from rising and an explosive situation occurs.

The explanation that a meteor exploded above ground is an attempt by the establishment to avoid the methane gas, and

thus the pole shift and shifting crust issue. Comets and meteors do not explode when encountering Earth’s atmosphere.

This is not what your history or science presents to you! If they are monstrous, they plunge to Earth and leave a crater

such as the Gulf of Mexico off Yucatan. If they are tiny, they burn up in the atmosphere as shooting stars. If they are

midsized, they burn on their periphery but land to be rocks picked up and examined by your scientists. The lack of

meteor particles or dust proves that it was not an exploding meteor. Methane, once burned or disbursed into the air,

leaves no trace. Meteors leave traces, methane does not.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s57.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:52 AM]

ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids

Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.

Recently the media and Internet message boards have been alerting the populace to the presence of what is termed

near-miss asteroids. Discussion ensues on how to deflect them should they threaten to impact the Earth, as though

deflection would be possible. Does mankind now have the means to deflect such large, rapidly moving objects? Such a

deflection would require a precisely placed explosive device of sufficient strength to vaporize the asteroid.

Disintegration would be required because deflection is not possible in space. This statement will meet with vehement

objection, especially from the arm of the establishment which seeks only to deflect panic in the populace. It is not a

collision with an asteroid which will shortly devastate Earth, it is the passage of the monster 12th Planet, ever drawing

closer. Nor will deflection of the trash in this giant comet's tail be possible - boulders as large as trucks thumping to

Earth on occasion and the peppering of red dust and gravel. Deflection of these few boulders is not possible either, as

they are shrouded in the swirling dust of the tail, and only visible just before impact.

Deflection of large objects traveling in space or plummeting to Earth must address several problems.

The object is traveling because it is caught in a gravitational attraction. This might not be the case in deep space,

but within the Solar System this is most certainly the case. If an asteroid is heading toward Earth, bumping it to

the side a bit or even temporarily stopping its motion is at best a delaying action. The asteroid will resume its

path, as the factors that influenced the path in the first place are still there.

Attempting to aim the asteroid so it falls in the ocean has the potential for making matters worse, not better.

Unlike the winged space shuttles, which can start their descent path at precise points and behave predictably,

asteroids do not take orders or respond to controls. They are odd shaped, their shape an unknown variable. They

may or may not burn fiercely, a heated air factor that is not known. They may circle or plummet, depending on

their weight and size, more unknown variables. Thus attempting to steer them could prove disastrous. Oops,

dropped it it right on the Pentagon!

A nuclear explosion set off on the surface of an object in space would have minimal effect, as the explosion can

expand in all directions at once. Nuclear explosions on the Earth's surface are an irresistible force meeting an

immovable object - the Earth! Where the explosion can expand up or outward into the atmosphere there is only

air turbulence. The portion of the explosion that is on the land side, or in the case of an underground explosion is

encapsulated, is between a rock and a hot expanding place. The explosion is forced into the rock strata by the

continuously expanding center of the explosion. Solid rock vaporized by nuclear explosions on the Earth's

surface does not equate to the damage that would be done by one or even many nuclear devices on the surface of

an asteroid. All parts of the explosion move rapidly out into space, and thus the asteroid is safely away before

the nuke really gets going. A firecracker. A gnat. A sneeze. And the asteroid proceeds on its way, having only

momentarily stepped aside to avoid mankind's silly experiment.

All the sudden upsurge in talk about the dangers asteroids present, and all the talk in the late 1990's about reviving the

Star Wars program to address this threat is not because something can actually be done. Short of making practical

plans to survive the coming pole shift while hunkered down on the surface of the Earth, mankind has no options, and

those in the establishment who talk up asteroid deflection possibilities know this. They are simply buying themselves

time by pushing the point where panic in the populace gets heated as far out as possible. Hopefully, the panic