http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s119.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: Speed
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Speed, in space, is a relative thing. Your submarines move more slowly than your cars because they deal with less
drag. Likewise, objects shot into space or incoming feel little distress when out where the atmosphere is negligible, and
tend to heat up and burn when in the thick of Earth's atmosphere. Thus, objects in space have
speed, other than what they might encounter. What might that be, in the case of Planet X, which we have described as
traversing the solar system from one side of Saturn's orbit to the other in 3 short months [Note: see 2003 Date explanation, as this was part of the May 15, 2003 white lie].
Human scientists who deal with gravity as some mysterious 'force', unexplained except by the math that
upon its speed it will either pass by a gravity draw, with an 'escape velosity', or be drawn in to crash,
ultimately, on the surface of the gravity draw or into some sort of circular or eliptical orbit. So the theory goes.
Apply the particle explanation to the force of gravity, as we have described it, and you have another scenario,
which by the way explains why your Moon remains
is, of course, drawn by the gravity pull of the Sun, and thus its periodic passage. But it is also pushed away by
the gravity particle streams emitted by the Sun, which can be described as a fire hose of force, meeting the fire
hose of force from Planet X itself. They buffer away from each other, forcing the speeding Planet X to
the Sun, at a distance based on its mass and the mass of the Sun. The reducing mass of the Sun explains why
Planet X is coming closer, during its passage, at the present time, than its past passage which were through the
Asteroid Belt.
This is a variable that depends on speed as well as mass. By the time Planet X enters the solar system, its speed
toward the Sun ensure that it will move past any other planet, including Jupiter, that it may come close to.
Should Jupiter stand directly in the path of Planet X during a passage, this would case a perturbation on
planets that would temporarily change their paths, but they would both resume essentially the same orbit or path
after the encounter. The speed of Planet X ensures this, as does the significant mass of both these planets. Were
Planet X to encounter a smaller object, such as occurred in the Asteroid Belt in the past, it would either be
treated like a meteor or if large enough to engage the Repulsion Force of gravity, become a moon satellite of
Planet X as many objects have. The pelting to pieces that occured in the Asteroid Belt was due to collisions of
objects not of significant size to invoke the Repulsion Force. Small planets, passing close to Planet X during its
high-speed passage, might become a satellite moon, or be pelted to pieces by one of Planet X's trailing moons,
though this has by change not occurred except in the heavily crowded Asteroid Belt, which contained some 24
planets and various moons of same prior to the past passages.
The effect on Planet X is, as with meteors entering your atmosphere, peripheral, so that the outer edges of the
atmosphere are altered, peeled off in the worst case, and need to be rebuilt from the oceans that cover most of
Planet X. This same atmosphere rebuilding occurs after the passage on Earth, from its oceans, as we have
described. Temporarily, the clouds are lower on Earth, but the adjustment is remarkably quick, so that survivors
are unaware of anything other than a lower cloud cover during the first few months.
In the dozen or so years prior to a passage, Planet X speeds up from almost a standstill to a zoom, toward the
foci it is approaching. Imagine the Earth without atmosphere, and a rock some miles overhead. What is the speed
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s112.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: Speed
limit on this rock as it plummets? There is
discussions on sci.astro, it has been surmised that the speed of Planet X approaches the speed of light during its
most rapid approach, and this astonishes those in the discussion. Why is it assumed that light is the
in the universe, re travel? Man thinks this because it is something he can measure. He is aware of such a small
percentage of matter and energy about him that to say that he comprehends 1% of what the universe is
composed of would be an overstatement. Our space travel, in 4th Density and even 3rd Density, is faster than
light, and we do not melt. Man does not understand, so we cannot give him satisfaction in our
