The advent of the space age and the increasing number of UFO sightings have generated intense curiosity about space
travel in human scientists. Some cling to the notion that all travel within or against a gravity field must be by
propulsion, clinging to known and familiar theories - airplanes lifting off the ground and running parallel as long as the
air stream over the wings can be maintained, or rockets sent out and away from the Earth's gravity by propulsion.
Space ships, which zip about and hover as though gravity
thus speculation is running rampant. Mankind will not be given the answers he seeks, nor will he be able to arrive at
the correct solution based on his own efforts. Human scientists are working and reworking their
which are fraught with errors, and thus, heading in the wrong directions, they will not succeed.
Various theories on how space ships maneuver have been put forth, but none have been on target.
The silliest theories are that space ships indeed use propulsion, but are subtle about it. These theories have the
space ships hovering by the same means that hover craft stay above the ground or water, by blowing air out from
the bottom of the craft. All this is accomplished, so the theory goes, without disturbing the air space, though this
obvious contradiction is never addressed. Sightings where space ships move silently through forests, with never
a branch or leaf moving as they pass, would seem to discredit this theory, but the advocates hold firm. This
theory is a favorite of some as it allows mankind to be on a technological par with the visitors.
A partially correct theory is that space ships generate their own gravity field. This is not so much a theory as an
observation, since ships not only hover as though treating the gravity pull of the Earth with disdain, but provide
the occupants with their own gravity field. Earth scientists in the employ of MJ12 have first hand knowledge of
this, having taken short jaunts in observation ships and having noted that the ground can be in view overhead,
yet their feet remain stuck firmly to the floor. Creating one's own gravity field is primarily for comfort, not
travel, but it is also a component required for travel.
Element 115, a heavy metal Bob Lazar was introduced to, is indeed one of the means to achieve space travel,
though not the only means. Element 115 does not in and of itself have magical properties, a fact which should be
obvious from the reports leaking out of MJ12 labs. If element 115 had special gravity features, generating its
own gravity field without abatement, then all the scientists would find their feet stuck to the container rather than
the lab floor. It is not element 115 per se but the structure of its composition that supports other steps in the
process, and about this we will say no more.
Short cuts, such as space warps, have been discussed for decades as the easy answer. The Universe is circular, so
the theory goes, and all one need do to go elsewhere is step back along the circle rather than go the whole way
around. This theory is absurd, and doesn't take much to dispute. How does the Universe manage to project itself
to its astronomers and the stargazers among its common folk as linear if its actually up there in curves? Is the
Universe conducting a massive conspiracy to delude mankind? Star systems that appear to be far away
fact at a distance, and there are no short cuts, distance wise.
Negating the Earth's atmosphere is one step in the process, and as we have mentioned is one of the reasons for
generating an internal gravity in a space ship during travel. This is done, however,
provide the environment for the next step. Space ships hovering above the Earth are still dealing with the Earth's
gravity field, in full.
Hovering involves invoking the repulsion force in a controlled manner, and space travel involves
a controlled manner. Space travel is a irresistible kiss, and a quick kiss, between two gravity attractors. This
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s77.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:41 AM]
ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices
quick kiss is achieved by turning off the repulsion force between two points, and is a carefully controlled
process. As mankind has yet to even accept the existence of a repulsion force, they will hardly arrive at the
scheme in the near future. And then, mankind is hampered by all the errors in their existing theories, which are
dragged forward as some sort of garbage that can never be discarded, held close to the hearts and minds of their
advocates.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s77.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:41 AM]
ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Scientists are acutely aware of the attraction force inherent in gravity, as are folks in general. The babe learns about
this early, while taking his first few steps. Oops. Ouch! It is assumed that gravity has only an attractive force, and that
the planets, in orbit around the Sun, are held in place by their momentum. Does this make sense? What caused the
momentum in the first place? Children play with a ball on the end of a string, swinging it around and around