The sound is different too. There's no narration.
There's very little of my voice, maybe because I did a lot of taping there and had enough other sounds.
Were you drawn to Cassis just because of the friendship with Jerome Hill?
Jerome Hill had a little outdoor theater there on the shore of the Mediterranean. Usually he brought over some musicians, like the Julliard Quartet. But in 1966 he persuaded the city of Cassis to cosponsorhe sponsored part of it himselfthe Living Theater's production of
. A special theater was built outdoors for the performance. Jerome wanted somebody to record the event; I agreed to help him. I filmed
and
was the greatest performance I have ever seen. Not the one that was brought to New York, but the one in Cassis.
Was the
section in
done at another time?
That was done in 1966.
Is
finished, or is it part of a larger film?
I am not sure. I have been thinking of changing it. I may make it into a two-screen film.
Is the amount of material that you have for all the other years similar to what you had for
? That's a pretty big film.
I have as much material from every year. There is a whole Cincinnati film.
Cincinnati?
Yes. I stayed there for a while. Also, I spent a lot of time around Jackie Kennedy's and Lee Radziwill's children. I have a lot of footage from that period.
How did that come about?
After Kennedy's death Jackie went through some difficult years during which she was concerned about the children. She wanted to give them something to do. Peter Beard was tutoring them in art history at the time. He suggested that I teach them some filmmaking. I got them simple cameras and made up some basic examples, which they had great fun executing. It proved to be just the thing they needed. Caroline has since turned to photography and cinema. When John was still in school, he made some very exciting four-screen 8mm filmsactually one of the most exciting four-screen films I've ever seen, almost as good as Harry Smith's.
Are you to the point where the footage feels like a weight you carry, or is getting back to it something you look forward to?
I really live only in my editing room. Or when I film. The rest
Page 108
of my life is slavery. But I am afraid that most of my early materialand my early films tooare fading, going. It would take about forty thousand dollars to preserve my films. That's a lot of money. Moneyor dust. Money against the dust of time into which all our works eventually disappear.
Page 109
Bruce Baillie
In the world of film studies, one often senses a suspicion of beautiful imagery, a suspicion based on the assumption that the apparatus of the movie camera is so constructed that it produces beautiful images almost automatically. Bruce Baillie's films are full of beautiful imagery, but they are anything but 'eye candy.' For Baillie, the filmstrip is a space where the physical world around him and the spiritual world within him can intersect; the screening room is a place where cinema devotees can share moments of illumination. The remarkable textures and colors of Baillie's films are not the products of a movie camera doing what it does automatically; they are achieved by means of homespun technologies Baillie devises to modify the camera so that it can be true to what his inner vision reveals to him, rather than to conventional visual and narrative expectations.
In his earliest films Baillie explored ways of visualizing his own mental states and of capturing something of the lovely simplicity of the people around him he saw as most deeply spiritual. Increasingly, his films became
