his glass of vodka--back and forth, back and forth--on the lacquered wood of the bar.
And so most people who met Eric Starvo Galt, if they noticed him at all, came to regard him as an oddity: a null set of stewing ambition, wiry and watchful, seemingly paranoid--and emphatically alone.
FOR SOME TIME since his arrival in Los Angeles, Eric Galt had been paying visits to a clinical psychologist named Dr. Mark O. Freeman. Their first appointment was on the late afternoon of Monday, November 27, 1967, and Galt, sharply dressed as usual, walked into Freeman's Beverly Hills office at around five o'clock. Dr. Freeman wrote in his daybook that his new patient hoped to 'overcome his shyness,113 gain social confidence, and learn self-hypnosis so he could relax, sleep and remember things better.'
They began to talk, and Dr. Freeman got a sense of the man. Galt naively seemed to believe that hypnosis was a form of communication expressed directly eye to eye, through some mysterious medium of thought rays. 'He had the old power idea114 of hypnotism,' Freeman said. 'He actually thought you could go around looking people in the eye and hypnotize them and make them do whatever you wanted them to do.'
Galt placed great value on the touted health benefits of hypnosis--and especially hoped to learn how to put himself under. All told, he met with Dr. Freeman on six occasions, throughout the months of November and December 1967. Dr. Freeman later said that Galt 'made a favorable impression' on him. The sessions were productive, he thought, and the two men got along well.
'He was a good pupil,'115 Freeman said. 'This fellow really wanted to improve his mind. He had a bent for reading. He didn't fight hypnosis. I'd show him how to go under, and pretty soon he'd be lying on the couch on his back and start talking. I taught him eye fixation, bodily relaxation, how to open himself to suggestion. I gave him a lot of positive feelings of competence.' While Freeman said that Galt confessed to no 'deep dark secrets,' he did note that in at least one of their sessions together, Galt disclosed a 'deep antipathy to negroes.'
Then, for reasons not known, Galt severed his relationship with Freeman, saying only that the psychologist 'didn't know nothing about hypnosis.' He canceled his last appointment with Freeman, telling him that his brother had found a job for him as a merchant seaman in New Orleans. Freeman never heard from Eric S. Galt again.
7 SURREPTITIOUSNESS IS CONTAGIOUS
IF MARTIN LUTHER KING had a committed enemy in J. Edgar Hoover, he had an equally staunch ally working in the same Justice Department building: the attorney general of the United States, Ramsey Clark. Ambitious, idealistic, a Marine with both a master's and a JD from the University of Chicago, the forty-year-old Clark was a tall, slender man with smoldering eyes and a full head of black hair. Clark had long admired King. He regarded the civil rights leader as 'a moral crusader,116 a unifying force, a persuasive voice demanding social justice, and an apostle of perhaps the most important lesson a mass society can learn--change through nonviolence.'
As the nation's highest law-enforcement official, Clark had long feared the possibility that someone might kill King. For years, his office had tried to keep abreast of every alleged plot and rumored bounty on King's head. Two years earlier, Clark, then an assistant attorney general, had traveled to Alabama to monitor the Selma-to- Montgomery march and personally scouted sections of the route for likely places where an assassin might hide. He had a strong premonition that King might be shot in Selma, a premonition based on hard evidence: the FBI had identified more than twelve hundred violent racist white males, many with felony convictions for racial offenses, who reportedly planned to converge on Selma. Worried about the threats, Clark sought out King during the march and found him in a tent by the side of the road, sound asleep.
'Here we all were biting our nails,'117 Clark recalled, 'and he was just sleeping like a baby. The man knew no fear--he literally walked in the valley of the shadow of death. I came to respect that.'
Born in Texas in 1927, Clark was the son of Tom Clark, a prominent Dallas lawyer who had himself served as attorney general (in the Truman administration) and who had recently retired as a Supreme Court justice. As a fair-haired prince of Washington, young Ramsey had grown up in a house filled with government insiders, diplomats, judges, and bureaucrats. When his father was AG, Ramsey used to toddle down the halls of the FBI and was even allowed to sit in J. Edgar Hoover's office.
The FBI director still viewed Clark as a little kid and patronized him to extremes. Hoover took a dim view of Clark's squishy liberal politics and his egghead notions about the root causes of crime. Hoover believed Clark was soft on Communism, soft on civil unrest, soft on law and order. Clark was the sort of man who, in his frequent writings on crime, was not the least bit bashful about writing sentences like this: 'We must create a reverence118 for life and seek gentleness, tolerance and a concern for others.' Troubled by the rise of what he regarded as an American police state that increasingly relied on electronic technology to spy on its own citizens, Clark argued that 'a humane and generous concern119 for each individual will do more to soothe and humanize our savage hearts than any police power that man can devise.'
These were the sorts of sentiments that made Hoover sick to his stomach.
Even though Clark was, technically speaking, his boss, Hoover freely telegraphed his disdain for his younger superior down through the FBI ranks. He had a variety of nicknames for the attorney general. He called him 'the Jellyfish.'120 He called him 'the Bull Butterfly' and 'the Marshmallow.' He said Clark was the worst head of Justice he'd ever seen. He even suspected the nation's top law-enforcement official might be a hippie. He once visited Clark's house and was appalled to find Mrs. Clark barefoot in her own kitchen. 'What kind of person is
Clark, for his part, kept wisely discreet on the subject of Hoover. 'I describe our relationship122 as cordial and he describes it as correct,' Clark had been quoted a few months earlier. Off the record, however, he believed Hoover's bureau had become too 'ideological' and too obsessed with finding Communists under every rock. Most important, he felt, the FBI was compromised 'by the excessive domination123 of a single person and his self-centered concern for his reputation.'
Clark knew all about Hoover's fixation on Martin Luther King. He
With subversives of King's caliber, however, Hoover saw no point in such constitutional niceties. As an object of Hoover's wrath, King represented the perfect trifecta, Clark realized. 'Hoover had three126 fairly obvious prejudices,' Clark told Hoover's biographer Curt Gentry. 'He was a racist, he upheld traditional sexual values, and he resented acts of civil disobedience--and King offended on every count.'
On the subject of King and nearly every other issue, Hoover and Clark failed to see eye to eye. Their worldviews were diametrically opposed, and their dysfunctional relationship was strained all the more by the simple administrative fact that Hoover
CARTHA D. DELOACH (everybody called him Deke) held the august position of assistant to the director, which made him third in command at the FBI. He was officially in charge of the FBI's General and Special Investigative divisions, as well as Domestic Intelligence and Crime Records. His real job, however, was to divine, down to microscopically fine tolerances, the boss's cryptic and ever-changing whims. He was good at it--so good, in fact, that many insiders considered DeLoach the likely successor to Hoover should the director die or step down.
DeLoach didn't relish his role as Hoover's liaison to Ramsey Clark. He hated being put in this delicate position