cannot impose upon those too well read in human nature to be easily deceived;

' and that, 'In order to forgive, we must have been injured.' There is, doubt

less, a class of readers to whom these remarks appear peculiarly pointed and

pungent; for we often find them doubly and trebly scored with the pencil, and

delicate hands giving in their determined adhesion to these hardy novelties by

a distinct tres vrai,8 emphasized by many notes of exclamation. The colloquial

style of these novels is often marked by much ingenious inversion, and a care

ful avoidance of such cheap phraseology as can be heard every day. Angry

young gentlemen exclaim?' 'Tis ever thus, methinks;' and in the half-hour

before dinner a young lady informs her next neighbour that the first day she

read Shakspeare she 'stole away into the park, and beneath the shadow of the

greenwood tree, devoured with rapture the inspired page of the great magi

cian.' But the most remarkable efforts of the mind-and-millinery writers lie in

their philosophic reflections. The authoress of 'Laura Gay,'9 for example,

having married her hero and heroine, improves the event by observing that 'if

those sceptics, whose eyes have so long gazed on matter that they can no longer

see aught else in man, could once enter with heart and soul into such bliss as

this, they would come to say that the soul of man and the polypus' are not of

common origin, or of the same texture.' Lady novelists, it appears, can see

something else besides matter; they are not limited to phenomena, but can

relieve their eyesight by occasional glimpses of the noumenon,2 and are,

therefore, naturally better able than any one else to confound sceptics, even

of that remarkable, but to us unknown school, which maintains that the soul

of man is of the same texture as the polypus.

6. A Javanese tree from which an arrow poison is 9. The 1856 novel Eliot has just satirized in the derived; here a figurative cliche meaning 'a poi-preceding section. sonous influence.' 1. Polyp. 7. Poetic cliches for England and Scotland, 2. An object of purely rational, as opposed to senrespectively. sual, perception (the latter being a phenomenon). 8. Very true (French).

 .

SILLY NOVELS BY LADY NOVELISTS / 134 5

The most pitiable of all silly novels by lady novelists are what we may call

the oracular species?novels intended to expound the writer's religious, phil

osophical, or moral theories. There seems to be a notion abroad among

women, rather akin to the superstition that the speech and actions of idiots

are inspired, and that the human being most entirely exhausted of common

sense is the fittest vehicle of revelation. To judge from their writings, there are

certain ladies who think that an amazing ignorance, both of science and of

life, is the best possible qualification for forming an opinion on the knottiest

moral and speculative questions. Apparently, their recipe for solving all such

difficulties is something like this:?Take a woman's head, stuff it with a smat

tering of philosophy and literature chopped small, and with false notions of

society baked hard, let it hang over a desk a few hours every day, and serve up

hot in feeble English, when not required. You will rarely meet with a lady

novelist of the oracular class who is diffident of her ability to decide on the

ological questions,?who has any suspicion that she is not capable of discrim

inating with the nicest accuracy between the good and evil in all church

parties,?who does not see precisely how it is that men have gone wrong

hitherto,?and pity philosophers in general that they have not had the

opportunity of consulting her. Great writers, who have modestly contented

themselves with putting their experience into fiction, and have thought it quite

a sufficient task to exhibit men and things as they are, she sighs over as deplor

Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату