tolerate in peace is particularly relevant today.
The oracle relied on by Eliza Larocque is real.
It is true, as Eliza Larocque noted, that save for Jesus Christ, more books have been written about Napoleon than any other historical figure, yet he remains enigmatic. He was, on the one hand, a capable and competent administrator, and on the other (as Eliza Larocque laments in chapter 35) a man with no loyalty, who consistently turned on his family, friends, and country. His hatred of financiers, and of incurring debt, is a historical fact (chapter 16). He also believed in plunder. In that regard, he was truly a modern Merovingian. Of course, he would say that his plundered loot was simply the spoils of war, and perhaps he’s right. Whether he actually hoarded away some of those spoils for himself-Napoleon’s cache, which plays such a central role in this story-remains a matter of debate.
No one knows. Nor will we ever.
Instead, Napoleon will continue to be studied and debated. Every volume that proclaims him a saint will be followed by another that decries him as a devil.
Perhaps, in the end, he said it best.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
STEVE BERRY is the