complete access to traditional forms of male power. At the same time, however, homosexual behavior was officially deemed pathological by the religious, legal, and medical establishments. In the popular imagination sexual preference was lumped with other forms of social and political deviance as threats to the national security. Literary treatments of sexuality, like all public expressions on the topic, were carefully regulated. Lesbian fiction had enjoyed a renaissance in the first half of the century, in such high modernist classics as Gertrude Stein's
Gay male fiction was more mainstream. Gay writers like Burroughs and Rechy held positions of authority in the counterculture. Large commercial houses published such gay love stories as Baldwin's
A more indirect strain in gay male writing avoided homosexual themes or situations altogether. Instead it presented straight plots in a gay style of parodic writing usually called 'camp.' Patrick Dennis (Edward Everett Tanner) wrote a string of wildly successful comic novels, most notably
As a sophisticated form of the literature of identity, minority novels tended to face directly questions of assimilation and cooptation. Yet in the problematic work of such popularizers as C. Y. Lee and Patrick Dennis we can begin to sense a more covert attempt to define -502- group identity. For while some commercial works did not treat seriously the moral and political dilemmas facing a subculture, they nevertheless studied community dynamics with sociological precision. Though not significant additions to the literature of ethnic sensibility, these novels might be said to have contributed to a related subgenre — the literature of environment — which defined cultural identity less in terms of who or what one was than in terms of where one lived and worked.
Novels of environment rarely experimented with the technical innovations of the age. The fractured time scheme and unreliable narrators favored by modernist authors in the first half of the century were largely rejected. Nor was it a literature of high sensibility and fine moral distinctions. The narrative voices were matter-of-fact rather than ruminative. Characters were stereotypes, and their moral dilemmas relatively straightforward. The authors avoided ambiguity and frequently displayed an explicit hostility to psychological explanations of human motivation. While not, like the Beats, in conscious revolt against academic criticism, they ignored traditional aesthetic criteria and valued as antecedents works little admired by the New Critics.
In some respects, the novels of environment looked back to the proletariat fictions of the 1940s; their prose was simple and declarative, crafted to reach the widest audience possible. They recalled as well the work of the turn-of-the-century naturalists, especially Norris and Dreiser, in their precise attention to the minutiae of everyday experience. Yet they possessed none of the reforming tendencies of these earlier traditions: neither the socialist underpinnings of proletariat novelists nor the philosophical pessimism, sexual candor, and social outrage of the naturalists. These works tended instead to be politically conservative, celebrating middle-class mores. In this conservatism, their truest antecedents were perhaps the English Victorian novel, especially the chronicles of Anthony Trollope, and its American counterpart, the sentimental novel of domesticity. Like their three-volume ancestors, these postwar popular fictions were often leisurely works, rich in descriptive detail, and overflowing with characters and plot. And like them, they coddled rather than challenged the bourgeois expectations of their readers.
The success of these commercial novels can be understood socio-503- logically. There had long been popular fiction — indeed, the novel as a genre was sometimes understood as a middle-class alternative to more elite literary forms like poetry. During the 1930s, however, technical advances in printing and binding made possible the publication of large printings of inexpensive texts. These advances culminated in the rise of the paperback edition in the final years of the decade and the shifts in production and marketing policy associated with that development. Drugstores and bus stations replaced bookstores as the primary sites for these new paperbacks. To maximize sales potential, editors sought work that was familiar, even formulaic, in nature. Such traditionalism was probably augmented by Broadway's and Hollywood's interest in optioning popular novels whose characters and plot lent themselves most readily to dramatic treatment. In postwar authors' response to these developments, the modern best-seller was born.
Such commercialized accounts had only a rudimentary interest in the political and psychological realities of ethnic identity. Leonard Q. Ross's (Leo Rosten's)
The function of such a popular 'literature of environment' as a necessary preliminary to social change could be best seen in postwar women's fiction. Even after the reinstatement of oppressive models of female domesticity, some women writers continued to work valiantly against gender stereotyping. Carson McCullers examined the alienation of African Americans, children, the handicapped, and especially women in such works as
Late in the postwar period the generalized sense of female unrest received a name and a focus from the publication of Betty Friedan's