‘A guy called Stuart Kind devised it. He accurately predicted where the Yorkshire Ripper lived by cross- indexing times of attack with locations. He figured out that this man was on a clock – he had to get home. So the later in the day the crime, the nearer to this man’s home.’
Kate nodded.
‘Ingenious. But I have a question. Why didn’t he throw everything into the sea, like he did the head? Assuming that was her head at Black Rock. And what happened to her arms and hands? OK, two questions.’
‘Perhaps he worried about the tides and that all the separate parts would end up in the same place,’ Gilchrist said. ‘Thought he could get away with disposing of the head like that. And that there would be a long gap between the discovery of that and the rest of the body.’
Tingley leant forward.
‘Gross as it sounds, a head is relatively easy to move around – heavy though it is. But a torso you’ve got more of a problem – the weight for one thing. If he’d chucked it in the sea, he’d probably have to do it in the trunk and then there’s the problem of floating.’
‘And the arms and hands?’ Kate said.
Tingley shrugged.
‘Don’t know. The arms shouldn’t have posed a problem of identification unless they had some distinguishing feature like a birthmark – these days it would be a tattoo.’
‘And the hands were because of fingerprints.’
‘Probably,’ Tingley said.
‘Though that in itself is interesting,’ Gilchrist said. ‘It means either that this woman had at some point been fingerprinted, so had a criminal record, or that the killer was ignorant and assumed that just the existence of fingerprints allowed for identification.’
‘If she had been fingerprinted, could that be because she was a prostitute?’ Kate said. ‘Killed by her pimp?’
‘Quite possibly,’ Gilchrist said.
Kate noticed that Watts had not contributed to the discussion but had been listening intently.
‘Let’s get back to the head,’ he now said. ‘If the head they found in the rock pool was the woman’s – wrapped in newspaper like the torso in the suitcase – then it’s likely he lived around here. He’s not going to be travelling far with a head – what would he carry it in, for one thing?’
‘A bowling bag?’ Tingley said.
‘Ugh,’ Kate said.
‘A man we have in custody walked from near Hove station to the pier with his friend’s head under his arm in the middle of the evening a couple of weeks ago, and nobody noticed,’ Gilchrist said.
‘These days anything is possible,’ Watts said, ‘but in 1934 I think somebody would have noticed. No, it still suggests he was local. He’s not going to make more than one trip from London to Brighton with body parts, is he? He wouldn’t want to risk being remembered. And lugging a trunk with a torso and a bag with a head in it at the same time would be risky. Plus, he’d want to dispose of the head at night. He couldn’t very well chuck it over the cliff edge in broad daylight.’
‘Can we check tide tables?’
‘Hang on,’ Gilchrist said. ‘Are we assuming that he threw the head in there? Why? Why couldn’t it have just ended up there – thrown in somewhere else and the tide tugged it there.’
‘OK,’ Tingley said. ‘But we’re getting somewhere. So his trip to King’s Cross – a special trip or was he going somewhere from there?’
‘If he was, he’d have to come back so, again, that’s doubling the risk of being remembered,’ Gilchrist said. ‘Supposing someone had opened the case in the meantime; staff would be on the lookout.’
‘So it was a special journey,’ Watts said.
‘But the same applies to Brighton station,’ Tingley said.
‘Which same?’ Gilchrist leant forward in her seat.
‘If we’re saying he lived down here, then wasn’t there a big risk when he was leaving the trunk at Brighton station that he’d be recognized and/or remembered lugging this trunk the next time he used the station?’
‘Hang on – break it down,’ Gilchrist said. ‘This is important. If he did live in Brighton, as you’re suggesting, then he ran two risks turning up at the station with a trunk. One: that he might bump into someone he knew. Who would later remember, when there was all the publicity, that he was lugging a trunk. Two: that as he lived here he might be recognized as a regular user of the station.’
‘You mean if he was a commuter?’ Kate said. ‘Did people commute from Brighton in those days? Plus we think he had a car.’
Tingley shrugged.
‘Well, all you’re really saying is that he lived down here but not in Brighton. He didn’t go up to London much because his business didn’t take him there.’
‘But that means she was based down here,’ Gilchrist said. ‘So you’d think they’d be able to figure out who she was.’
‘Why was she killed?’ Watts said.
Kate replied:
‘The police theory from the files we have is that she was probably the mistress of a married man who killed her because she was pregnant.’
‘Good,’ Tingley said. ‘If she was a mistress in London that he visited regularly, then the station might be a problem.’
‘Unless he drove,’ Kate said.
‘But trains were quicker and more frequent then,’ Tingley said.
‘So it’s like not shitting on your own doorstep,’ Gilchrist said.
‘Exactly.’
‘OK,’ Watts said. ‘Alternative scenario. He was London-based but had a second home here. He didn’t come down often but when he did he drove. He brought her down here to kill her. Then maybe never came down again for a couple of years. He was nondescript anyway so no real worries about being recognized.’
Gilchrist nodded slowly.
‘But if he’s London-based, then he’s anonymous and we can’t ever locate him. If he’s down here, then at least we stand a chance.’
‘You mean by the rules of this kind of investigation?’ Tingley said.
‘What do you mean?’ Kate said.
‘Well – Jack the Ripper – all the theories revolve around a small number of suspects listed in the police files. So Ripperologists spend all their time trying to prove which one of them did it. But why on earth should the police have hit on the right suspects? So then you get the wild card theorists who suggest it was the Prince of Wales or the Masons or Walter Sickert. But given the fact that with a random killing or crime these days the police haven’t got a clue without DNA or confessions or blind luck, then the chances are the Ripper was somebody totally different.’
Kate frowned.
‘And you’re saying that applies here?’
‘No, no, this is different. There’s a surfeit of information – thousands of statements. It’s like the Yorkshire Ripper and all those high-profile cases. The police have already got the guys without realizing it – they’re in there among the statements. The torso murderer is somewhere in the thousands of statements the police took.’
‘But we don’t have those statements,’ Kate said. ‘They were destroyed. We just have a few of them.’
‘When were they destroyed?’ Watts said.
‘In the 1960s on the order of the Chief Constable,’ Kate said. ‘I assume it was some thirty-year rule.’
Watts looked at her intently for a moment.
‘What?’ she said.
‘Nothing,’ Watts said. ‘Are there files anywhere else?’
‘I’m going to the County Records Office tomorrow. There are files there. There is one other thing too, which isn’t in the copies I gave you.’
Watts tilted his head.
