maintained he knew nothing of any conspiracy.
Again, the arrest of
Celebrated profiler Robert Ressler, who heads the Virginia-based corporation Forensic Behavioural Sciences, visited Juarez at the invitation of the authorities and concluded that his former employer, the FBI, were wrong. He found that 76 of the murders fitted into a pattern. The victims were all women aged between 17 and 24. Most of them had been raped and strangled, and more than a dozen had been killed on their way to, or on the way home from, work at a
“I think it’s probably two or three,” he said. One of them, he thought, was an American coming across the border to take advantage of the situation in Juarez. The police had already demonstrated their inability to catch one killer. There were plenty of dark streets and abandoned buildings, and with a transient population of young women there were plenty of victims to choose from.
“It’s an ideal situation for an American with money,” said Ressler.
The founder of the Citizens’ Committee Against Violence Astrid Gonzales Davila said: “The failure to solve these killings is turning the city into a Mecca for homicidal maniacs.”
Candice Skrapec, the Canadian-born professor of criminology at California State University in Fresno, also identified 67 cases where she thought serial killers were involved. She told the
Skrapec believed that “Railway Killer” Angel Maturino Resendez, was one of the perpetrators as he had lived in the
Resendez was charged with nine counts of murder. The first was the murder of a 21-year-old college student who was bludgeoned to death while walking with his girlfriend along a railway line in Kentucky on 29 August 1997. After that eight more bodies were found in victims’ homes along a railroad track from Texas to Illinois as he travelled from state to state. His last two victims were a 51-year-old woman and her 79-year-old father who were found dead in their home near the line in Gorham, Illinois, on 15 June 1999.
Although Resendez could be a suspect in at least some of the Juarez killings, it is unlikely that he was responsible for the majority of the unsolved cases. Indeed, they continued after his arrest.
In December 1999, a mass grave was found outside Ciudad Juarez. It contained nine corpses—three belonging to three US citizens. This invited renewed attention across the border with some, again, suspecting the involvement of the Mexican police. The
These missing persons became known as
Three days after the grave had been opened bus drivers Gustavo Gonzalez Meza,
The suspects claimed that their statements were extracted under torture. Their lawyers received death threats. On 5 February 2002, one of them was killed by police after a high-speed chase. The police claimed they “mistook him for a fugitive” and a judge ruled that the shooting was “self-defence”. Meanwhile it was revealed that DNA tests had failed to confirm the police’s early identifications of the victims. New DNA tests apparently confirmed the identification of Veronica Martinez, though it threw no light on the other seven cases. Then Gonzalez died in jail, ostensibly from complications arising after surgery.
By now 51 suspects were in jail, but still the killing did not stop. Ten days after Garcia and Gonzalez and Garcia were arrested, the body of another young woman, stripped and beaten to death, was found in Ciudad Juarez.
On 9 March 2002, member of the Texas state legislature joined a protest march through El Paso. Then a federal deputy attorney general in Mexico City claimed that the killings were committed by “juniors”—the son of prosperous Mexican families whose wealth and influence had protected them from arrest. He was quickly found another job. Later that year the FBI returned to lend a hand but have failed to further the investigation.
Juarez’s leaders are particularly conscious of the effect the killings are having on the image of the city. When a large wooden cross was erected as a memorial to the murdered women, the mayor received a letter from the chamber of commerce, complaining that this would damage tourism.
The day that letter was received—23 September 2002—the bodies of two more women were found in Ciudad Juarez. One victim was strangled and partially undressed; the other, the police said, had died of a drug overdose. Special investigator David Rodriguez was “sceptical” of that claim. Another young woman was found beaten to death two weeks later. Then Martha Sahagun de Fox, Mexico’s new first lady, addressed more than a thousand women dressed in black who marched through Mexico City in protest at the deaths.
In January 2003, residents of Lomas de Poleo reported finding three corpses, but the Attorney General Jesus Solis and the police refused to confirm or deny whether they were connected to
On V-Day, 14 February 2004, in Ciudad Juarez, busloads of female students from around the world calling themselves “vagina warriors” marched into town for special performances of
On 17 February 2003, two teenagers searching the wasteland for cans and bottles found three more bodies. When the police turned in Mimbre Street at 2 p.m., they found the remains of three women dumped there. While the bodies were being removed, an onlooker found a fourth.
At a press conference two days later the police said that they had identified three of the victims—16-year- old Esmeralda Juarez Alarcon who had vanished on 8 January 2003, 17-year-old Juana Sandoval Reyna who had been missing since 23 September 2002 and 18-year-old Violeta Alviedrez Barrios who had disappeared 4 February 2003. All three had last been seen alive in downtown Juarez. When asked about the fourth victim, the police refused to acknowledge that there was another body and called a halt to the press conference. With no end to the killings in sight, the authorities are in a state of denial.