6. Francis Becket,
7. It may be useful to cite the main part of this document. Here it is: All of us have for many years advocated Marxist ideas both in our special fiels and in political discussion in the Labour movement. We feel therefore that we have a respnsability to express our views as Marxists in the present crisis of intenational socialism. We feel that the uncritical support given by the Executive Commitee of the communist party to the Soviet action in hungary is the undesirable culmination of years of distortion of fact, anf failure by british Communists to think out political problems for themselves. We ahd hoped that the revelations made at the Twentieh congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet union would have made our leadership and press realisz that Marxist ideas will only be aceptable in the British labour movement if they arise from the truth about the world we live in. The exposure of grave crimes and abuses in the USSR and the recent revolt of workers and intellectuals against the pseudo-Communist bureaucracies and police systems of Poland and Hungary, have shown that for the past twelve years we have based our political analyses on a false presentation of the facts — not an out-of-date theory, for we still consider the Marxist method to be correct. If the left-wing and Marxist trend in our Labour movement is to win support, as it must for the achievement of socialism, this past must be utterly repudiated. This includes the repudiation of the latest outcome of this evil past, the Executive Commutee’s underwriting of the current errors of Soviet policy.
Sent to
8. Eric Hobsbawm, ’The Historians’ Group of the Communist Party’ in Cornforth,
9. Andrew Thorpe,
10. Henry Pelling,
11. See chapter 1, ’Problems of Communist History’, of my Revolutionaries (London, 1973).
12. See my Memoir of him in
13. Ibid., p. 539.
14. A recent version may be found in my book (with Antonio Pollito)
13. Watershed
1. Tony Gould,
2.
3. Francis Newton,
4. It was published in the USA in 1960 by a small left-wing publishing house, republished in an updated edition by Penguin Books in 1961, and subsequently translated into French for a series edited by Fernand Braudel, into Italian and into Czech.
14. Under Cnicht
1. Richard Haslam in
2. As I write this chapter, my son Andy tells me for the first time of the occasion, presumably in the 1970s, when, after two other Croesor boys had left them, his friend told him apologetically: ’The others told me to beat you up, but I don’t want to. Could you pretend I did, when they show up?’ Even so, the friendship faded as the mother made him increasingly unwelcome in the farm.
15. The Sixties
1. For my contemporary judgement of the May events, see ’May 1968’, written later taht year in E.J. Hobsbawm,
2.
3. I did not consciously note this at the time, but the point is well taken by Yves Pages, who has edited the complete record of the graffiti in the Sorbonne, collected and preserved by five university employees at the time. See
4. Quoted in H. Stuart Hughes,
5. Alain Touraine,
6. Eric J. Hobsbawm,
7. This article is cahpter 22 in my
8. Sheila Rowbotham,
9. Ibid., p. 203.
10. Ibid., p. 196.
11. Carlo Feltrinelli,
12. Rowbotham,
13.
16. A Watcher in Politics
1. Martin Jacques and Francis Mulhern (eds),