Frank Main, 'Blogger Buys Presidential Candidate's Call List,' Chicago Sun-Times, January 13, 2006, available at http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-cell13.html (cached: http://www.webcitation.org/5J6lTHqRI).
Peter H. Lewis, 'Forget Big Brother,' New York Times, March 19, 1998, G1.
Brin, The Transparent Society , 8–15.
For a good story that effectively summarizes the state of Web advertising, and for a dis cussion of how DoubleClick operates and the case study of 3M's sale of projectors through the advertising placement company, see Aquantive, available at http://www.aquantive.com (cached: http://www.webcitation.org/5J6lYzNkL) and 24-7 Real Media, available at http://www.247realmedia.com (cached: http://www.webcitation.org/5J6lb94Gu).
See Federal Trade Commission, 'Privacy Online: A Report to Congress,' June 1998, n.107, available at http://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy3/toc.htm (cached: http://www.webcitation.org/5KxTWmw3f).
See Gandy, The Panoptic Sort, 1–3.
Johnson, Interface Culture, 192–205. Andrew Shapiro calls this the 'feedback effect' but argues that it narrows the range of choices; see Andrew Shapiro, The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know (New York: PublicAffairs, 1999), 113.
See, for example, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 US 334, 341–43 (1995).
See Janai S. Nelson, 'Residential Zoning Regulations and the Perpetuation of Apartheid,' UCLA Law Review 43 (1996): 1689, 1693–1704.
Examples of laws that aim at segregation based on social or economic criteria include: regulations requiring a minimum lot size for housing; single-family ordinances prohibiting 'nontraditional' families from living in certain areas; and residential classifications that exclude apartment housing. All such restrictions significantly increase the cost of housing for lowerincome individuals; see ibid., 1699–1700.
In 1926 the Supreme Court held zoning to be a valid exercise of local governmental power. See Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company, 272 US 365 (1926) (holding that a state has the right to separate incompatible uses). Not until the twentieth century were municipalities given much power to regulate areas of law such as zoning decisions; see Richard Briffault, 'Our Localism: Part I — The Structure of Local Government Law,' Columbia Law Review 90 (1990): 1, 8–11, 19.
In 1917 the Supreme Court outlawed racial zoning as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; see Buchanan v. Warley, 245 US 60 (1917). However, 'nonexclusionary' zoning regulation was used to preserve residential segregation; even though racially neutral and based on economic factors (ostensibly to prevent property devaluation), various laws and regulations have resulted in de facto segregation; see Briffault, 'Our Localism,' 103–4; Meredith Lee Bryant, 'Combating School Resegregation Through Housing: A Need for a Reconceptualization of American Democracy and the Rights It Protects,' Harvard BlackLetter Journal 13 (1997): 127, 131–32.
See Joel Kosman, 'Toward an Inclusionary Jurisprudence: A Reconceptualization of Zoning,' Catholic University Law Review 43 (1993): 59, 77–86, 101–3.
See Gordon S. Wood, The Radicalism of the American Revolution (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992), 5–8, 271–86.
