15—16
Final Maids in the Kitchen touch—one of the maids upstairs looked over—saw Carter—watched Carter went in—saw dentist dead
17—18
Miss Montressor—dark—striking—gardening—her footprint in bed
19—20
P outlines case—smart patent new shoe—foot and ankle strap—buckle torn off. Later woman found—shoe and buckle sewn on. It was a woman’s shabby shoe—other was new
But it just doesn’t work. The early sections—the buckle, picking up sticks (clues) and laying them straight (interpreting them)—are acceptable. But the gardening motif (‘men must delve’) and the maids looking over the banisters are simply unconvincing. The dauntingly clever plot does not need this window-dressing and the book can stand, without any references to the rhyme, as a supreme example of detective fiction.
If, however, any further proof were necessary of the ingenuity and fertility of Agatha Christie, a glance at almost any page of Notebook 35 would supply it. The following ideas are scattered throughout the notes for
Idea of two women—one criminal working with man goes to dentist—simply in order to give man alibi
Harvey—rich, unscrupulous—married to young wife—a widow when he married her—had she murdered first husband?
Or Double suicide man and woman—one of them not the person—therefore suicide not murder—dentist could have identified her
M. wants to get rid of someone—(his wife?) therefore he kills his wife and another man but it proves not to be his wife but another woman
Poirot investigates the mysterious death of an elderly man when his suspicions are aroused—by the man’s diet.
The title of ‘Four and Twenty Blackbirds’ appears for the first time in Notebook 20:
4 and 20 blackbirds
Located ahead of Christie’s reminder to herself (‘To be added—Sketch of Leatheran career—Chapter II’) to amend
Impersonation of old man—he eats a different meal on the Tuesday—nothing else noticed. Died later.
Mr P Parker Pyne—They talk—points out elderly man with a horn beamed and spectacles eye-glass—bushy eyebrows
Old fellow hasn’t turned up—waiter says he is upset—first noticed it a fortnight ago—when he wouldn’t have his jam roll—had blackberry tart instead. Sees body—teeth—no blackberry tart. Empty house—fell downstairs— dead—open letter
There is one particularly surprising aspect of the jottings in Notebook 66—the allocation of this case to Parker Pyne instead of Hercule Poirot. In fact this change could be quite easily imagined; this is not one of the more densely plotted Poirot stories, and it is probable that market forces dictated the substitution of the Belgian. And as we shall see, this is not an isolated example of the interchangeability of characters.
It has to be said that the connection to the nursery rhyme is very tenuous. For the purposes of the story the blackbirds of the rhyme become blackberries: the main clue is the lack of discoloration of the victim’s teeth (‘Sees body—teeth—no blackberry tart’) despite the fact that he was seen to eat blackberry pie shortly before his supposed death. The rather obvious disguise is the other important element of the tale. A more fitting title is that used on the story’s first US appearance in
Carla Lemarchant approaches Hercule Poirot and asks him to vindicate her mother, who died in prison 16 years earlier while serving a sentence for the murder of her husband. Poirot approaches the five other suspects and asks them to write accounts of the events leading up to the fatal day.
Published in the UK in January 1943, having already appeared in the US six months earlier,
From the technical point of view the test Christie sets herself in this novel is daunting. As well as the 16-year gap between the crime and its investigation she limits herself to just five possible murderers. Seven years earlier she had first experimented with the device of a small circle of suspects; in
It is also the greatest of Christie’s ‘murder in the past’ plots. In fact if we don’t count
The nursery rhyme is quoted in full in Notebook 35, heralding 75 pages of notes:
5 Little Pigs
One Little Piggy went to Market (Market Basing)
1 little “ stayed at home
1 little “ had roast beef
1 little “ had none