“And do dogs frequent the areas where she plays?”
“Yes,” said Jane. “She goes looking for them. She loves dogs.”
“And is it possible that the dogs have defecated where she plays?”
“I guess so,” said Jane.
“It is possible that this is the explanation,” said the Omani doctor. “Visceral larva migrans. We will have to run tests, of course. A biopsy of the liver. That will be a nuisance, but I would strongly suggest it.”
“Yes, please,” said Rogers.
“I can arrange for your regular doctor to supervise the tests,” said the Omani.
“No!” said Rogers. “Absolutely not. I want you to treat my daughter.”
The Omani protested that transferring the case would be awkward. But Rogers pressed him and he eventually agreed.
“Doctor,” said Jane warily. “Can roundworms be cured?”
“Oh yes,” said the doctor. “Quite often there is a complete recovery within six to twelve months.”
Jane Rogers collapsed into her husband’s arms. Rogers was still too scared to let himself believe the good news.
The Omani doctor’s diagnosis proved right. Amy was suffering from roundworms. The doctor prescribed the appropriate medicine, and she began to respond to the treatment.
But there were complications, of a political sort. Dr. Fawzi, the Egyptian, was furious at the young Omani doctor for interfering in his case. He petitioned the local medical society to withdraw the young doctor’s license. Later, as the Rogers were leaving Oman for Beirut, they heard that Dr. Fawzi was bringing pressure on the local hospital, through some of his wealthy patients, to have the young doctor removed from his residency.
Rogers was enraged. But the American Ambassador in Muscat insisted that he shouldn’t get involved any more deeply. It was a local matter.
Now, in Beirut, Amy was getting better. It was like a reprieve. Like one of the Old Testament stories where God devises a terrible punishment but in the end, for reasons that are unfathomable, relents.
The next morning Rogers left early for the office to send a message to Jamal. He showed a draft to Hoffman, who in turn showed it to the ambassador, who cabled the State Department desk officer. When the brief message had been cleared by the various layers of the bureaucracy, Rogers typed it on a blank sheet of paper and put it in a plain white envelope.
The message read: “The United States is urging the leaders of the Lebanese Christian militia to show restraint in the current crisis. The United States urges Fatah to show similar restraint.”
Rogers attached a cover note to Fuad, instructing him to pass the message to Jamal for delivery to the Old Man. He also asked Fuad to press Jamal for details on the military situation in Beirut.
The message was simple but the processs of delivering it was complicated by security procedures. An embassy courier took the letter and dropped it in the mailbox of “Trans-Mediterranean Forwarding Agents,” a fictitious company that maintained a one-room office in the Starco Building downtown. A Lebanese contract agent carried it from there to a dead drop in an alleyway in the Souk Tawile. The courier then called Fuad from a public telephone and, using a prearranged code, told him that a message was waiting.
Fuad retrieved the message and called Jamal. Using another prearranged code, he set up a meeting an hour later at a crowded cafe. Three layers had been interposed between the American case officer and the Palestinian. If the system worked, the links in the chain were invisible.
Fuad reported back to Rogers twenty-four hours later. They met in an apartment off Hamra Street, entering the building fifteen minutes apart through different doors. Fuad handed Rogers a brief message from Jamal written in neat Arabic script, quoting the text of an Arabic proverb that was unfamiliar to Rogers.
The message read, in its entirety: “They came to milk the goat. He broke wind.”
“What in the hell is this supposed to mean?” demanded Rogers.
Fuad looked reproachfully at his case officer. He removed his sunglasses.
“I assume it means that this particular goat has no milk for you.”
“I still don’t get it,” said Rogers. “Translate for your American friend.”
“I believe Jamal means that you asked the wrong person for information about the Kahhaleh incident, and so you are getting a rude reply,” Fuad said gently.
“Great!” said Rogers. “That’s very helpful. Anything else?”
“We talked for a few minutes about the situation,” answered Fuad.
“What did Jamal say?”
“He said that he talked to the Fatah military leaders after he returned to Beirut. They told him that Fatah wasn’t to blame. The Christians provoked the crisis. He said that Fatah has shown restraint from the beginning and doesn’t need advice from the Americans.”
“That’s the party line,” said Rogers. “I could have read that in the newspaper.”
“Jamal says it’s true. He said one other thing. One of the PLO splinter groups is trying to exploit the situation. They fired mortar rounds on Christian areas of the city last night and they will try to do it again. He said that the Old Man is opposed to the extremists, and that they are the ones you should worry about, not Fatah.”
“If it’s just the crazies, this will die down,” said Rogers.
“Probably,” agreed Fuad.
“Was Jamal angry at my message?”
“He was until he thought of the proverb about the goat. Then he stopped being angry. He said that you should add it to your collection.”
Rogers briefed Hoffman on the intelligence report and drafted a cable for Langley. The crisis in Lebanon would blow over, the cable said. The PLO group with the most firepower, Fatah, didn’t want a confrontation. Other Palestinian factions were trying to exploit the situation, but without Fatah’s support they could be contained easily by the Lebanese authorities.
“Not bad,” said Hoffman. “Maybe your little operation isn’t entirely worthless, after all. But loverboy had better be right about this one. Because if he isn’t, we are in very serious trouble. There are people on the Christian side screaming bloody murder. They want to pound the refugee camps into rubble, and we’re telling them to cool it.”
“I trust our man,” said Rogers. “Besides, he’s all we’ve got.”
“Send the cable,” said Hoffman.
The Beirut station looked good the next day when the gunfire around the Tal Zaatar refugee camp stopped and the Lebanese prime minister, a Moslem, issued a statement declaring that the crisis was over.
17
Beirut; April 1970
It took Rogers several weeks to complete the Personal Record Questionnaire, or PRQ, formally proposing that Jamal be enrolled as an agent. The real work was already done. The contacts had been made in Beirut, Amman, and Kuwait. Jamal, whatever his status, was already providing timely information. But none of that mattered to the bureaucracy. Their triumph was to reduce the mysterious and often sublime relationships of the intelligence world to an orderly flow of paper.
Rogers loathed this sort of paperwork. The PRQ was a lengthy document that was itself compartmentalized for security reasons. Part I was a seven-page biographical summary, much like the resume that a normal job-seeker might present to a prospective employer. It included the subject’s name, birth date, and home address; the names of his parents, his educational background, his hobbies; it also summarized his drinking habits, drug usage, and sexual history. Part I used true names throughout.
The PRQ Part II had the juicy operational details. It explained how the subject had been spotted and assessed, how the information about him in Part I had been gathered, and most important, how the case officer intended to use him. It was a sort of operational game plan, outlining how the agent would be run and what intelligence he would be expected to provide. Part II referred to the agent only by a cryptonym. The segregated parts of the PRQ went into the agent’s basic file in the central registry, known as the “201 file.” In theory, the
