shoulder-length hairstyle created a peculiar visual bond. Alice Hubbard wore a simple, unpretentious afternoon dress of blue serge. Hubbard wore a loose-fitting blue jacket that had certainly once been new, though perhaps not in this century; underneath was a white shirt and an oversize, floppy darker blue velvet tie, and on the floor next to him was a battered briefcase. .
Another briefcase! Was there a million dollars in it, I wondered, or perhaps several bags of diamonds? That would have fitted the trend, all right-although in this case, the “treasure” in that battered bag was more likely page after scribbled page of words of wisdom from the aphorism-spouting “homely philosopher.”
I knew quite a bit about Hubbard already, having written several humorously critical articles about him (in one of which I’d termed him “the P.T. Barnum of the arts”). His career as an author-he was sort of a Mark Twain without the wit or storytelling ability-had not begun until his mid-thirties. A poor boy who’d quit high school to work as a travelling salesman, he had sold soap door-to-door, educating himself by devouring books in the dim light of dingy hotel rooms.
No one could deny that Hubbard had a gift for sales-had he not been so sincere about his beliefs, he would have made a wonderful confidence man. He had risen to a partnership in that soap company, which his admittedly clever merchandising ideas had turned into a multimillion-dollar enterprise. At the height of this success he walked out to enroll in college!
He chose Harvard, no less, where his writing teachers looked at his prose and advised a return to the soap business. Indignant, Hubbard left the campus, returned to his farm home in small East Aurora, New York, and began submitting his work to Manhattan publishers, who also knew soap when they smelled it.
Finally, finding no takers for his brilliance in prose, Hubbard began to self-publish his magazine,
He had built an empire of sorts there in East Aurora, becoming a kind of benign cult leader to a group called the Roycrofters, who lived in a village he ruled. He invited people to come to learn to work with their hands, while, in their spare time, learning to use their minds. At the end of the work day, the Roycrofters would listen to music and read books. It was capitalism dressed up like communism.
The Roycrofters’ chief source of income was printing and binding expensive editions of the classics as well as Hubbard’s own writings (Alice’s, too). In addition they wove rag rugs and baskets, and manufactured hand- modelled leather goods, brassware, pottery, and Mission-style furniture.
“I’m pleased to talk to you, Mr. Van Dine,” he said. He had an undeniable warmth, and possessed a presence as compelling as his wife-who disappeared into the sofa-did not. “After all, one of my tiny claims to fame is pioneering the on-the-spot profile.”
“Your ‘Little Journeys,’ ” I said, with a forced smile and a nod, referring to booklets he’d published over the years in which he’d written articles based on visits with famous people. John D. Rockerfeller, Luther Burbank, Thomas Edison-one celebrity a month for fourteen years. . all of the articles hero-worshipping tripe.
Though his face was almost childishly placid, his brown eyes had fire. “I presume you wish to speak to me about my article. . Did you get a copy?”
“No, I did not, sir.”
“How about you, young lady?”
“No, Mr. Hubbard,” Miss Vance said.
He beamed and reached down and unlatched the bulging briefcase, withdrawing two copies of a digest-sized magazine with a rather plain cover. He handed a copy to me, and another to Miss Vance, with obvious pride.
The magazine’s title-
A small design included the volume and issue number, and in a justified-margin square of type it said: “Printed Every Little While for the Society of the Philistines and Published by Them Monthly. Subscription, One Dollar Yearly. Single Copies, Ten Cents. October 1914.”
“I’m anxious to read your article,” I said, meaning it. “But I’ve already read many excerpts in the press.”
“ ‘Who Lifted the Lid Off Hell?’ has attracted more attention than anything I’ve written since ‘Garcia.’ ” He was grinning like a monkey, and his wife was looking at him sideways, with her own smile, less the simian variety and more the madonna.
Miss Vance said, “I understand it’s quite critical of Kaiser Bill.”
“I like to call him Bill Kaiser,” Hubbard said, and winked at her, as if this were an incredible display of wit.
“You called him a number of other things, too,” I said. I had the magazine open, and quickly scanned the article that was considered the most scathing condemnation of the Kaiser to appear in any American publication to date, looking for examples. “Here you say he’s ‘a mastoid degenerate’. . and here, a ‘megalomaniac.’ ”
Hubbard was nodding. “Bill Kaiser’s always speaking of God as if the Creator were waiting to see him in the lobby. He says God is on his side.” He snorted a laugh. “Any man who believes the Maker of the Universe takes a special interest in him is clearly a megalomaniac.”
He had a point.
I offered another example: “The Kaiser’s a ‘sad, mad, bad, bloody monster.’ ”
Again nodding, Hubbard said, “That’s right. Oh, some have said Bill Kaiser has kept the peace for forty-three years. . but he was just biding his time for this grab at world domination. And every male child born in those forty- three years, who can carry a gun, is being made to do that monster’s obscene bidding.”
“ ‘Caligula, that royal pagan pervert, was kind compared to the Kaiser.’. . ‘Nero, the fiddling fiend, never burned half as much property.’. . And yet you expect the Kaiser to grant you an audience? An interview?”
He folded his arms, and that kindly face offered me a patronizing smile. “Mr. Van Dine, the only way to avoid criticism is to do nothing. . and say nothing.”
“But if you want the Kaiser to listen to reason, wasn’t it a mistake to-”
“The greatest mistake you can make in life is to continually fear you’ll make one.”
How could you discuss anything intelligently with this human homily machine?
“Bill Kaiser,” he was saying, “is just another of these self-appointed folk who rule us, who are unwilling to do unto others as they would be done by them. . that is, to mind their own damned business and cease coveting things that don’t belong to them! That’s all war is, you know-a result of the covetous spirit to possess.”
I didn’t disagree with any of this, exactly, it just seemed obvious, as obvious as the way this character liked to hear the sound of his own voice.
But Miss Vance, surprisingly, seemed keenly interested, and asked him, “Why do you think the German people stand behind ‘Bill Kaiser,’ then?”
“The answer is easy,” he said. “It’s a matter of the hypnotic spell of patriotism. . the lure of the crowd, combined with coercion. Look at Germany today! No private individual can operate an automobile. No bands can play in public parks. All savings banks are closed. Factories are closed. Colleges have been turned into hospitals- why not? All the students are at the front!”
I tried again. “Do you consider yourself anti-German, or just anti-‘Bill Kaiser’?”
“Oh, my heart is with Germany! The Germany of science, invention, music, education, skill. The crazy Kaiser will not win.”
“But you think he will talk to you.”
“Even if I don’t get any closer to the Kaiser than the Paris suburbs, I’ll write of the war from an American point of view that’s sorely needed-from Zeppelin raids over London, to the British viewpoint on American neutrality.”
“But you’ve heard from the German government. .?”
“Yes-they say I will be allowed to observe conditions as they are. I will represent myself with a friendly nature and a quiet demeanor.”
“What’s the use of the trip, then?”
He grinned and tapped his skull alongside the flowing graying locks. “I intend to store all in my bean and in that way elude the censor. I’ll give the truth to my readers, when I get back. . if I get back.”
“You have your doubts?”
