And precisely as recent research has demonstrated the relationship between Pekin and Babylon, so investigation in Central America has proved that there is a mysterious bond of union connecting the Chinese and one of the races of Mexico. The resemblances are so great that Mr.
Short (“North Americans of Antiquity,” p. 494) says, “There is no doubt that strong analogies exist between the Otomi and the Chinese.” Senor Najera (“Dissertacion Sobre la lingua Othomi, Mexico,” pp. 87, 88) gives a list of words from which I quote the following:
---------+------------+----------+--------+------------ +
| Chinese. | Othomi. | English. | Chinese. | Othomi | English. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+ | Cho | To | The, that. | Pa | Da | To give. |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Y | N-y | A wound. | Tsun | Nsu | Honor. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+ | Ten | Gu, mu | Head. | Hu | Hmu | Sir, Lord. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+ | Siao | Sui | Night | Na | Na | That. |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Tien | Tsi | Tooth | Hu | He | Cold. |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Ye | Yo | Shining | Ye | He | And. |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Ky | Hy (ji) | Happiness. | Hoa | Hia | Word. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+ | Ku | Du | Death | Nugo | Nga | I |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Po | Yo | No | Ni | Nuy | Thou. |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Na | Ta | Man | Hao | Nho | The good. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+ | Nin | Nsu | Female | Ta | Da | The great. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+ | Tseu | Tsi, ti | Son | Li | Ti | Gain. |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Tso | Tsa | To perfect | Ho | To | Who. |
---------+------------+---------- +--------+------------+ | Kuan | Khuani | True | Pa | Pa | To leave. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+ | Siao | Sa | To mock | Mu, mo | Me | Mother. |
---------+------------ +----------+--------+------------+
Recently Herr Forchhammer, of Leipsic, has published a truly scientific comparison of the grammatical structure of the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Muscogee, and Seminole languages with the Ural-Altaic tongues, in which he has developed many interesting points of resemblance.
It has been the custom to ascribe the recognized similarities between the Indians of America and the Chinese and Japanese to a migration by way of Behring’s Strait from Asia into America; but when we find that the Chinese themselves only reached the Pacific coast within the Historical Period, and that they came to it from the direction of the Mediterranean and Atlantis, and when we find so many and such distinct recollections of the destruction of Atlantis in the Flood legends of the American races, it seems more reasonable to conclude that the resemblances between the Othomi and the Chinese are to be accounted for by intercourse through Atlantis.
We find a confirmation in all these facts of the order in which Genesis names the sons of Noah:
“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and unto them were sons born after the flood.”
Can we not suppose that those three sons represent three great races in the order of their precedence?
The record of Genesis claims that the Phoenicians were descended from Ham, while the Hebrews were descended from Shem; yet we find the Hebrews and Phoenicians united by the ties of a common language, common traditions, and common race characteristics. The Jews are the great merchants of the world eighteen centuries after Christ, just as the Phoenicians were the great merchants of the world fifteen centuries before Christ.
Moreover, the Arabians, who are popularly classed as Semites, or sons of Shem, admit in their traditions that they are descended from “Ad, the son of Ham;” and the tenth chapter of Genesis classes them among the descendants of Ham, calling them Seba, Havilah, Raamah, etc. If the two great so-called Semitic stocks—the Phoenicians and Arabians—are Hamites, surely the third member of the group belongs to the same “sunburnt” race.
If we concede that the Jews were also a branch of the Hamitic stock, then we have, firstly, a Semitic stock, the Turanian, embracing the Etruscans, the Finns, the Tartars, the Mongols, the Chinese, and Japanese; secondly, a Hamitic family, “the sunburnt” race—a red race—including the Cushites, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Hebrews, Berbers, etc.; and, thirdly, a Japhetic or whiter stock, embracing the Greeks, Italians, Celts, Goths, and the men who wrote Sanscrit-in other words, the entire Aryan family.
If we add to these three races the negro race—which cannot be traced back to Atlantis, and is not included, according to Genesis, among the descendants of Noah—we have the four races, the white, red, yellow, and black, recognized by the Egyptians as embracing all the people known to them.
There seems to be some confusion in Genesis as to the Semitic stock. It classes different races as both
