new set of enemies lining up against us.”
Faith had promised Allio he would turn his attention to payday finance as soon as the mortgage fight was over, but months passed without Faith making any commitments. “I was still dragging my feet,” Faith said. “So now Tom is getting even more pissed.” It was no longer a question of what he thought of payday loans. A woman on his staff was getting calls at work because of a sibling who was past due on some loans and he heard from another friend whose sister had also gotten herself into a deep hole using them. “Once you start looking into this thing, you see it’s a really ugly world,” Faith said. But Faith, ever the pragmatist, wanted to see if they stood a chance before jumping into the fight. He checked in with a few friendly legislators and he set up a meeting with the governor- elect, a Democrat named Ted Strickland. Strickland, who would take office at the start of 2007, asked him to wait, but he also made it clear he would sign something if it reached his desk. Faith had similarly encouraging signs from the others, so he informed Allio he was on board.
The group called themselves the Ohio Coalition for Responsible Lending—a self-conscious nod to the Center for Responsible Lending. Jim McCarthy and Dean Lovelace were members, as were a long list of labor leaders, housing activists, community organizers, legal aid attorneys, and those representing faith-based organizations around the state. “To many of us this wasn’t just an economic issue but a moral one,” Allio said. “The high interest rates they charge is a modern-day form of usury. I don’t care what the text, whether it be Jewish or Catholic or mainline Protestant, there’s clear statements in each against usury and the need to offer fair interest rates.” The group decided that its aim would be to cap the interest rates that payday lenders could charge and limit the number of loans a person could take in a given year. “We had people calling the office every day who are like, ‘I’ve got five, six, ten payday loans, I’m trapped,’” said Nick DiNardo, a legal aid attorney in Cincinnati. “And there was nothing we could really do short of helping them if the collections got too aggressive.” It fell to Faith to find a lead sponsor for their bill.
The new governor was a Democrat but the Republicans still controlled both the Ohio House and Senate. So instead of starting with a good liberal, Faith surprised his allies by first approaching a conservative legislator named Bill Batchelder. With Leonid Brezhnev eyebrows, oversized Mars Blackmon glasses, and a tendency to quote Adam Smith, Batchelder hardly seemed to fit the bill of consumer champion. But if they could first muster Republican support, Faith reasoned, some of the bipartisanship good feeling they had nourished during the mortgage fight might carry over to payday. Besides, the two got along famously. Unlike most every other lobbyist traipsing through his office, Batchelder told me, he always found Faith a man of conviction “who was actually looking to engage you in a serious policy debate.” If some of Faith’s allies were inclined to describe Batchelder as one of the legislature’s “cavemen conservatives,” that was all right with Batchelder, who reacted to the characterization with a burst of delighted laughter.
Batchelder and Faith might disagree about most everything but he was an easy sell on payday lending. Batchelder told him he was happy to sponsor the Coalition for Responsible Lending’s bill, not despite Adam Smith, the first apostle of laissez-faire, but because of him. “The rates lenders charged were a moral question for Smith,” Batchelder said. “Smith pointed out that if you charge too much, you damage a society. And he’s right. You can’t charge people these kinds of interest rates without hurting their situation and society.” In October 2007, Batchelder and Robert Hagan, a liberal Democrat from Youngstown, introduced a bill that would impose a 36 percent rate cap on the interest rates payday lenders could charge.
In Washington, D.C., Steven Schlein reacted to the news with an indifferent shrug. After four years with the payday lenders, he had learned not to get too worked up over every dispatch from the hinterlands. “Every year a bunch of states put payday into play,” Schlein said. “But then in the end you have few actual fights.” They had lost legislative battles in Oregon and New Hampshire over the previous few years but mainly they ended up with a compromise that the big chains could live with. “Ohio didn’t seem one of the places we should worry about it,” Schlein said.
In Spartanburg, Billy Webster was similarly unconcerned. The market was too important and the industry too strong in Ohio to lose. Check ’n Go was based in Cincinnati and the Davis brothers several years earlier had had the foresight to spend the money necessary to lure away a top Ohio Senate staffer to run its governmental affairs office. There was also CheckSmart, based in Columbus, a chain of 175 payday and check-cashing stores that had just been sold to a large New York–based private equity fund for $268 million. After writing a check that big and with half of its stores in-state, CheckSmart’s investors weren’t going to sit idly by. “We were told time and time again,” Webster said. “With Check ’n Go and CheckSmart there, there was no way Ohio would be in play.”
The Coalition for Responsible Lending held forums across the state and organized small delegations to meet with individual legislators and with the editorial boards of all the big daily newspapers. A local research group, Policy Matters Ohio, released a report demonstrating that payday had become widespread even in the state’s suburban and rural areas. When, in the autumn of 2007, Marc Dann, the state’s Democratic attorney general, announced he would be holding hearings investigating the lending practices of the state’s 1,600 payday stores, the search was on for customers and employees, or at least former employees, willing to talk about their experiences.
The first of three hearings was held in a large Baptist church on Cleveland’s east side. The industry might have been confident about a victory but they were hardly complacent. Its supporters showed up in full force, wearing yellow “I Support Payday Lending” buttons and made sure their perspective was voiced. They pointed to the list of “best practices” their trade association had developed, including a twenty-four-hour rescission policy and a once-a-year extended payment plan for customers who get themselves into financial trouble with a payday loan. Payday’s critics, many of whom sported buttons showing a shark’s snout biting into a large stash of cash, dismissed these voluntary policies as not worth the paper they were printed on. One of the more moving speakers in Cleveland was a man named Charles Mormino, who told the crowd about a family member with psychiatric problems (he was no more specific than that) who had gotten into trouble with a trio of payday stores. He settled up her debts at all three and then sent a certified letter to each alerting them to the family member’s problem. But all three—Advance America, CheckSmart, and ACE Cash Express—continued to do business with her.
A former payday manager named Tom Kirk spoke at the attorney general’s hearing in Columbus. On paper, Kirk said, the payday lenders were generally responsible citizens. There were in fact rules at the company where he worked against lending to a customer carrying loans at multiple stores, and there were policies to protect borrowers from overzealous collections. The rub was that employee bonuses were based largely on volume. “The policy manual of the company I worked for was good,” Kirk said. “The problem is that the district manager and the store managers and the store personnel don’t always follow it.”
Those who supported the Batchelder bill might have felt encouraged by their organizing efforts if not for one failing: They seemed to be getting nowhere in their hunt for legislators willing to join their crusade. Particularly baffling was the reluctance of House Democrats to commit to their cause. “Several of the legislators were not friendly, verging on hostile,” said Jeff Modzelewski, an organizer for BREAD, a church-based group in the Columbus area, who met with all twelve legislators representing the capital and its suburbs in the statehouse. Even Joyce Beatty, the House minority leader, a black woman representing central Columbus, proved frosty. “We figured she would be strongly enthusiastic,” Modzelewski said. “She represents a black, poor urban district with inner-city problems. But meeting with her—she was among the worst. I’m there with twenty church members and she’s talking to us like we don’t know what we’re talking about.”
There are people in the black community, of course, with a favorable view of the poverty industry. In South Carolina, I spent an evening with Willie Green, the former pro football player who had proven brave or foolish enough to appear on
“He made that sacrifice for us. If my dad had not had the ability to use a pawnshop, I wouldn’t be where I am. I wouldn’t have been able to go to college. I wouldn’t have been able to play professional sports.”
But Joyce Beatty was another story. The
