The Grey Wig: Stories and Novelettes

'It wasn't the dull, foggy weather?'

'No, my lud, else I should never get up early.' (Laughter.)

'You drink something before going to bed?'

'I like my cup o' tea. I take it strong, without sugar. It always steadies my nerves.'

'Quite so. Where were you when the prisoner told you he was going to Devonport?'

'Drinkin' my tea in the kitchen.'

'What should you say if prisoner dropped something in it to make you sleep late?'

WITNESS (startled): 'He ought to be shot.'

'He might have done it without your noticing it, I suppose?'

'If he was clever enough to murder the poor gentleman, he was clever enough to try and poison me.'

The JUDGE: 'The witness in her replies must confine herself to the evidence.'

Mr. SPIGOT, Q.C.: 'I must submit to your lordship that it is a very logical answer, and exactly illustrates the interdependence of the probabilities. Now, Mrs. Drabdump, let us know what happened when you awoke at half- past six the next morning.' Thereupon Mrs. Drabdump recapitulated the evidence (with new redundancies, but slight variations) given by her at the inquest. How she became alarmed-how she found the street door locked by the big lock-how she roused Grodman, and got him to burst open the door-how they found the body-all this with which the public was already familiar ad nauseam was extorted from her afresh.

'Look at this key (key passed to witness). Do you recognise it?'

'Yes; how did you get it? It's the key of my first-floor front. I am sure I left it sticking in the door.'

'Did you know a Miss Dymond?'

'Yes, Mr. Mortlake's sweetheart. But I knew he would never marry her, poor thing.' (Sensation.)

'Why not?'

'He was getting too grand for her.' (Amusement.)

'You don't mean anything more than that?'

'I don't know; she only came to my place once or twice. The last time I set eyes on her must have been in October.'

'How did she appear?'

'She was very miserable, but she wouldn't let you see it.' (Laughter.)

'How has the prisoner behaved since the murder?'

'He always seemed very glum and sorry for it.'

Cross-examined: 'Did not the prisoner once occupy the bedroom of Mr. Constant, and give it up to him, so that Mr. Constant might have the two rooms on the same floor?'

'Yes, but he didn't pay as much.'

'And, while occupying this front bedroom, did not the prisoner once lose his key and have another made?'

'He did; he was very careless.'

'Do you know what the prisoner and Mr. Constant spoke about on the night of December 3rd?'

'No; I couldn't hear.'

'Then how did you know they were quarrelling?'

'They were talkin' so loud.'

Sir CHARLES BROWN-HARLAND, Q.C. (sharply): 'But I'm talking loudly to you now. Should you say I was quarrelling?'

'It takes two to make a quarrel.' (Laughter.)

'Was prisoner the sort of man who, in your opinion, would commit a murder?'

'No, I never should ha' guessed it was him.'

'He always struck you as a thorough gentleman?'

'No, my lud. I knew he was only a comp.'

'You say the prisoner has seemed depressed since the murder. Might not that have been due to the disappearance of his sweetheart?'

'No, he'd more likely be glad to get rid of her.'

'Then he wouldn't be jealous if Mr. Constant took her off his hands?' (Sensation.)

'Men are dog-in-the-mangers.'

'Never mind about men, Mrs. Drabdump. Had the prisoner ceased to care for Miss Dymond?'

'He didn't seem to think of her, my lud. When he got a letter in her handwriting among his heap he used to throw it aside till he'd torn open the others.'

BROWN-HARLAND, Q.C. (with a triumphant ring in his voice): 'Thank you, Mrs. Drabdump. You may sit down.'

SPIGOT, Q.C.: 'One moment, Mrs. Drabdump. You say the prisoner had ceased to care for Miss Dymond. Might not this have been in consequence of his suspecting for some time that she had relations with Mr. Constant?'

The JUDGE: 'That is not a fair question.'

SPIGOT, Q.C.: 'That will do, thank you, Mrs. Drabdump.'

BROWN-HARLAND, Q.C.: 'No; one question more, Mrs. Drabdump. Did you ever see anything-say, when Miss Dymond came to your house-to make you suspect anything between Mr. Constant and the prisoner's sweetheart?'

'She did meet him once when Mr. Mortlake was out.' (Sensation.)

'Where did she meet him?'

'In the passage. He was going out when she knocked and he opened the door.' (Amusement.)

'You didn't hear what they said?'

'I ain't a eavesdropper. They spoke friendly and went away together.'

Mr. GEORGE GRODMAN was called, and repeated his evidence at the inquest. Cross-examined, he testified to the warm friendship between Mr. Constant and the prisoner. He knew very little about Miss Dymond, having scarcely seen her. Prisoner had never spoken to him much about her. He should not think she was much in prisoner's thoughts. Naturally the prisoner had been depressed by the death of his friend. Besides, he was overworked. Witness thought highly of Mortlake's character. It was incredible that Constant had had improper relations of any kind with his friend's promised wife. Grodman's evidence made a very favourable impression on the jury; the prisoner looked his gratitude; and the prosecution felt sorry it had been necessary to call this witness.

Inspector HOWLETT and Sergeant RUNNYMEDE had also to repeat their evidence. Dr. ROBINSON, police surgeon, likewise retendered his evidence as to the nature of the wound, and the approximate hour of death. But this time he was much more severely examined. He would not bind himself down to state the time within an hour or two. He thought life had been extinct two or three hours when he arrived, so that the deed had been committed between seven and eight. Under gentle pressure from the prosecuting counsel, he admitted that it might possibly have been between six and seven. Cross-examined, he reiterated his impression in favour of the later hour.

Supplementary evidence from medical experts proved as dubious and uncertain as if the court had confined itself to the original witness. It seemed to be generally agreed that the data for determining the time of death of any body were too complex and variable to admit of very precise inference; rigor mortis and other symptoms setting in within very wide limits and differing largely in different persons. All agreed that death from such a cut must have been practically instantaneous, and the theory of suicide was rejected by all. As a whole the medical evidence tended to fix the time of death, with a high degree of probability, between the hours of six and half-past eight. The efforts of the prosecution were bent upon throwing back the time of death to as early as possible after about half- past five. The defence spent all its strength upon pinning the experts to the conclusion that death could not have been earlier than seven. Evidently the prosecution was going to fight hard for the hypothesis that Mortlake had committed the crime in the interval between the first and second trains for Liverpool; while the defence was concentrating itself on an alibi, showing that the prisoner had travelled by the second train which left Euston Station at a quarter-past seven, so that there could have been no possible time for the passage between Bow and Euston. It was an exciting struggle. As yet the contending forces seemed equally matched. The evidence had gone as much for as against the prisoner. But everybody knew that worse lay behind.

'Call Edward Wimp.'

The story EDWARD WIMP had to tell began tamely enough with thrice-threshed-out facts. But at last the new facts came.