substantial portion of the forward fuselage. The cockpit. It was pretty near intact. A few of the windows had blown out, from concussion. The rest were still coated with paint.
You never found his body?
No.
Ryterband’s body hasn’t been recovered either?
Nor the five million dollars ransom, for that matter.
Was either man known to be a strong swimmer?
Ryterband was a pretty good swimmer as a boy. I wasn’t able to find out about Craycroft.
Skinner
Dear Mr. Mayor:
Enclosed are edited, partial transcripts of interviews with some of the participants in the Craycroft affair.
To date the inquiry has produced more questions than answers. By way of a preliminary report to the commission, I prefer to let the witnesses’ testimony speak for itself.
There is evidence of human error and bureaucratic foot-dragging, but there is also evidence of extraordinary competence and initiative. Captain Henry L. Grofeld, NYPD, should be singled out for particular commendation. It may be suggested that certain men of faulty judgment were found to be in dangerous positions of power during the critical moments, but the most deadly thrust of the crisis was averted by decisive men. That such men were called upon and were available may be regarded as lucky coincidence; yet I am inclined to believe it was largely a matter of natural selection. Mr. Jack Harris, Sergeant William J. O’Brien (NYPD), and Mr. David Eastlake of the Federal Reserve Bank may seem at first glance to have been fortuitously placed, but one can also infer that when crises occur, men will appear who are willing and able to confront them.
One cannot be sure that the solutions offered in media res by Brigadier General Michael J. Adler, Jr., or by Joel Azzard, District FBI Director, might not have proved as minimally destructive as the method actually employed. Men of goodwill but of different persuasions often find common ground on which to pool their resources in time of urgent crisis. To coin a cliche, adversity brings out the best in us all.
For those reasons I do not believe any useful purpose would be served by empaneling an additional superagency designed to deal with extraordinary crises which may occur in future. Freak incidents, by definition, cannot be anticipated or prepared for. Adding another layer to the bureaucracy would not contribute usefully to the pool of talent currently available-a pool whose flexibility, as we have seen, is a major virtue. We cannot codify every possible crisis; we can only muddle on.
Sincerely,
Robert Wendell Skinner, Ph. D.
