Judge Sobel didn't have a no-touching rule, and Tom Burke either hadn't noticed or was too confident of his case to worry about it. Even Jaywalker himself knew that it was going to take a lot more than touching Samara to get her off. In fact, jury selection itself posed a huge prob lem for him. Going into a trial, Jaywalker almost always had a preconceived notion as to what kind of jurors he wanted on that specific case. Because the process was a crapshoot-meaning you never really knew what you were getting with any particular individual-you were pretty much reduced to playing hunches and going with the odds. And going with the odds meant you followed stereotypes. Prosecutors invariably looked for establishment types- clean-shaven, Republican-voting, white businessmen who showed up wearing suits and ties, carrying leather attache cases. Jaywalker sought out ethnic minorities drawn to teaching, social work and the humanities, people who would no more put on a necktie to do jury service than they would rent a tuxedo to watch a ball game on TV. He looked for those young enough to still be idealistic, or old enough to have learned how to forgive. Unemployed was good, a military background bad. Irish, Germans and Italians were to be avoided as tough on crime, blacks and Jews embraced as empathetic toward underdogs. Crime victims were suspect, while those who'd been accused of crimes were sought after. And so the guessing game went.
But beyond stereotypes, it was the nature of the case- and, even more so, the nature of the defendant-that dictated what type of juror Jaywalker wanted. If his client was African-American, he wanted blacks; if Hispanic, he wanted fellow Latinos. If the case was likely to turn on the word of police witnesses, he wanted jurors from Harlem who knew that cops stole and lied. People who viewed them as oppressors, in other words, rather than protectors. If it was sympathy he needed, he wanted women. But not just any women. No, he wanted women who took in HIV-positive foster children, looked after crack babies, volunteered at soup kitchens and read to the blind in their spare time.
Samara's case posed huge problems. The media had unfailingly portrayed her as a spoiled brat, a gold digger and a shameless adulteress. She was white and rich. Ac cused of plunging a knife into her husband's heart, she was hardly a candidate for sympathy. And the evidence would show that it hadn't been the police who'd lied this time around, but Samara herself who'd lied to them. Even her looks might work against her. Women of all ages, sizes, shapes and shades of color were likely to be jealous of Samara's prettiness and petiteness. Men, even as they might be dazzled by her beauty, could hardly be forgiven for identifying with her husband-victim.
Which left precious little room for the ideal juror. Unless, that was, Jaywalker happened to come across twelve equally pretty and petite gold diggers who'd had occasion to murder their husbands, either in real life or only in their fantasies.
As the clerk swore in the panel, Jaywalker looked around the room to see which of the prospective jurors would choose to affirm, rather than take an oath that ended with the words 'So help me, God.' A prohibitive long shot in the trial, he was looking for anyone with the slightest anti-establishment bent. After all, it would take twelve jurors to convict Samara, but only one to hang the jury.
Every one of them took the oath.
The clerk spun a large wooden drum, the kind they used to use at bingo parlors, and pulled out a slip of paper. 'Seat number one,' she said, 'Ronald Macauley, M-A-C-A-U L-E-Y.' A man rose from the back of the room and made
his way to the jury box. He was white, fiftyish, wore a dark suit and tie, and carried a Coach attache case. No good, Jaywalker thought. On a tear sheet of a homemade chart on the table in front of him, he wrote: MR. MACAULEY
The clerk repeated the process until the box had been filled, with twelve jurors taking up the regular seats and another six relegated to the chairs set aside for alternates. Jaywalker made notes for each of them. By the time the eighteenth was seated, he had two OKs, five question marks and eleven NGs.
As he'd expected, it was going to be a very long day.
Judge Sobel addressed the panel, speaking loudly enough so that not only those in the jury box could hear him but so could those back in the spectator section. He introduced the 'parties,' as he referred to them-Burke, Jaywalker and Samara-and had each of them stand in turn and face the rear of the room. Then he described the case, reading the indictment as part of it, and made some general remarks. Next he asked if there were any prospective jurors who felt they were unqualified to serve on the case.
A sea of raised hands responded. One by one, jurors approached the bench to explain why they couldn't pos sibly serve.
'I could never judge a fellow human being.'
'I look at her, and I know she's guilty.'
'I'm indispensable at work.'
'I have plane tickets to Aruba this Friday.'
'I have a cat I can't leave home alone all day.'
'I have an unusually small bladder.'
'No speak English.'
One by one, the judge excused them. Then he individu ally questioned the eighteen sitting in the box, a number that included some who'd been there from the start and others who'd been added to replace casualties of the process. He inquired about their occupations, their places of birth and their family status, and whether they'd ever been the victim of a crime or been accused of having com mitted one. Each time a juror said something meaningful to Jaywalker's way of thinking, he made a note of it on the corresponding tear sheet, and from time to time he even changed his overall impression of a particular juror. A couple of original question marks soured into NGs, and several NGs became NG! s. But at the end there were still only two OKs, and neither of those had sprouted an!
A very long day indeed.
Tom Burke rose, and for the next half hour he asked questions of the potential jurors, some general, some ad dressed to a particular individual. Burke was a no-nonsense lawyer with a nice way about himself. He asked the jurors what organizations they belonged to or donated money to, what magazines they subscribed to or read on a regular basis, and what television programs they liked best. He asked for their assurances that they wouldn't be influenced by the defendant's prettiness, or by the fact that she was a woman. He asked them to promise that if he proved her guilt by the legal standard, they would return a verdict of guilty.
They promised.
Jaywalker's turn didn't come until after the lunch break. Lunch for everyone else, that was. Jaywalker, who never ate breakfast and skipped lunch when he was on trial, found a spot on a windowsill by the elevator bank, and spent the hour reviewing his notes and composing his ques tions. But the truth was, he'd pretty much known what he was going to ask for weeks now, for months. His approach to jury selection was radically different from just about every other lawyer he knew. As much as he was interested in what magazines a prospective juror read, he never asked. He had two reasons.
First, while it was comforting to know that a juror pre ferred The New Yorker to Guns and Ammo, the price of learning that piece of information was that the D.A. learned it, too, and would now use it to exercise one of his peremptory challenges against the liberal New Yorker reader. So the knowledge gained was illusory and, in the long run, worthless.
Second, there was simply no time for such nonsense. Samara Tannenbaum was on trial for murder. The sixteen jurors whom Jaywalker was about to question had walked into the courtroom figuring she was guilty, either for sure or probably. A couple of them had even been honest enough to say so, or smart enough to know that saying so would get them a ticket home. Jaywalker had exactly half an hour to change that perception and turn the trial into a ball game. That worked out to less than two minutes a juror. He'd be damned if he was going to spend one second of that time asking them about magazines.
Nor would he ask them for promises of fairness. If a juror was the kind of person who was inclined to be fair, no promise was necessary. And if the juror wasn't going to be fair, it logically followed that no promise he or she made could be trusted. And again, there was simply no time to waste on such nonsense.
'My name is Jaywalker,' he told them, when finally it was his turn to get up and talk to them, 'and I represent the defendant, Samara Tannenbaum.' Standing behind her now, placing a hand on each of her shoulders. Just in case they'd missed it this morning.
Jaywalker's philosophy of jury selection, as radical as it was, was quite simple. It began with the proposition that, as the last of the three to ask questions-the judge having been the first and the prosecutor the second-he
