lids.
“Well, try me,” he protested.
She did not immediately respond; and when she spoke, her first words were explanatory rather than interrogative.
“I want to begin by saying that I believe I once did you an injustice, to the extent of misunderstanding your motive for a certain action.”
Durham’s uneasy flush confessed his recognition of her meaning. “Ah, if we must go back to
“You withdraw your assent to my request?”
“By no means; but nothing consolatory you can find to say on that point can really make any difference.”
“Will not the difference in my view of you perhaps make a difference in your own?”
She looked at him earnestly, without a trace of irony in her eyes or on her lips. “It is really I who have an
“Oh, my reasons—” groaned Durham.
“I have learned to understand them,” she persisted, “by being so much, lately, with Fanny.”
“But I never told her!” he broke in.
“Exactly. That was what told
She paused, and then said slowly: “Have I understood you? Have I put my hand on your motive?”
Durham sat speechless, subdued by the rush of emotion which her words set free.
“That, you understand, is my question,” she concluded with a faint smile; and he answered hesitatingly: “What can it matter, when the upshot is something I infinitely regret?”
“Having refused me? Don’t!” She spoke with deep seriousness, bending her eyes full on his: “Ah, I have suffered—suffered! But I have learned also—my life has been enlarged. You see how I have understood you both. And that is something I should have been incapable of a few months ago.”
Durham returned her look. “I can’t think that you can ever have been incapable of any generous interpretation.”
She uttered a slight exclamation, which resolved itself into a laugh of self-directed irony.
“If you knew into what language I have always translated life! But that,” she broke off, “is not what you are here to learn.”
“I think,” he returned gravely, “that I am here to learn the measure of Christian charity.”
She threw him a new, odd look. “Ah, no—but to show it!” she exclaimed.
“To show it? And to whom?”
She paused for a moment, and then rejoined, instead of answering: “Do you remember that day I talked with you at Fanny’s? The day after you came back from Italy?”
He made a motion of assent, and she went on: “You asked me then what return I expected for my service to you, as you called it; and I answered, the contemplation of your happiness. Well, do you know what that meant in my old language—the language I was still speaking then? It meant that I knew there was horrible misery in store for you, and that I was waiting to feast my eyes on it: that’s all!”
She had flung out the words with one of her quick bursts of self-abandonment, like a fevered sufferer stripping the bandage from a wound. Durham received them with a face blanching to the pallour of her own.
“What misery do you mean?” he exclaimed.
She leaned forward, laying her hand on his with just such a gesture as she had used to enforce her appeal in Mrs. Boykin’s boudoir. The remembrance made him shrink slightly from her touch, and she drew back with a smile.
“Have you never asked yourself,” she enquired, “why our family consented so readily to a divorce?”
“Yes, often,” he replied, all his unformed fears gathering in a dark throng about him. “But Fanny was so reassured, so convinced that we owed it to your good offices—”
She broke into a laugh. “My good offices! Will you never, you Americans, learn that we do not act individually in such cases? That we are all obedient to a common principle of authority?”
“Then it was not you—?”
She made an impatient shrugging motion. “Oh, you are too confiding—it is the other side of your beautiful good faith!”