undeniable ring of truth, but obviously I cannot vouch for the absolute veracity of the whole. Readers should also be aware that the URLs I have listed were available when this note was written, but are not necessarily still extant, the Internet being a fluid and dynamic resource.
The story begins in the late 1960s, and one of the first documented references is held in the US Senate Library. It’s a record of an Appropriations Hearing that was held in July 1969, when the United States Department of the Army specifically requested (and subsequently received, in 1970) a ten-million-dollar grant to develop a synthetic biological agent that would impair or destroy the human immune system. [8]
Round about the same time, personnel employed by a number of American medical organizations authored articles that advocated similar kinds of research aiming at the development of a hybrid virus that would have the same function.[9]
Then, in the early 1970s, Henry Kissinger allegedly wrote a Top Secret document – a National Security Memorandum that subsequently became known as NSM 200 – which essentially stated that the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World should be depopulation. This memorandum, which was declassified in 1990, was apparently adopted by the National Security Council as official US foreign policy towards the Third World.[10]
Action followed in 1972 when medical teams were sent into Central Africa – into an area that subsequently became known as the ‘AIDS Belt’ – and administered what was described as a smallpox vaccination to several thousand Africans.[11] This event was followed some time later by the first outbreak of AIDS on the planet.
Earlier, I mentioned the significance of the dates of the American infections. In 1978 a medical programme administered Hepatitis B Vaccine to thousands of male homosexuals living in New York; nineteen months into the AIDS pandemic, five hundred and one of the dead were from New York. In 1980 a similar programme was run in San Francisco, with almost precisely the same results. In both cases, the only common factor in the spread of the disease was that all the victims had either received the hepatitis vaccine or were closely associated with someone who had.[11]
But everybody knows that AIDS is essentially a venereal disease, transmitted primarily by male homosexuals. Isn’t it? No, it isn’t. At least, not according to the British Royal Society of Medicine, which has stated that AIDS meets none of the criteria of a venereal disease and has suggested that, despite the misrepresentations of the American medical establishment and the American Government, AIDS is not primarily a sexually transmitted disease.[12]
Semen is just about the least effective transmission medium for AIDS, and the virus is only present in microscopically small numbers in the semen of an infected person. Furthermore, condoms are useless in preventing the spread of AIDS, because the virus is less than half the size of the smallest sub-microscopic holes that are found in every condom.[12],[13]
But don’t take my word for it. As part of the evidence that was submitted in a memorandum to the British Parliament’s House of Commons Social Services Committee in 1987, Dr John Seale of the Royal Society of Medicine stated: ‘As far as it goes, the tiny research effort into infectivity of bodily fluids indicates that saliva is far more infectious than genital secretions, but that blood is vastly more infectious than either. Consequently, the idea that [the use of] condoms can have any significant effect on the spread of AIDS in a nation is utterly preposterous’.[12]
And: ‘Governments all over the world are spending millions of pounds, advising their citizens to prevent AIDS by using condoms on the basis of manifestly fraudulent misrepresentation of scientific evidence’.[12]
A better description of AIDS is just that it’s a transmissible disease, and contracting AIDS does not directly depend on your sexual orientation. That said, most research suggests that male homosexuals are primarily responsible for the spread of the disease in Western society but not, in the main, through exchange of semen or saliva. The principal transmission method appears to be through the bleeding that can accompany certain types of homosexual activity.
The best method of contracting AIDS is through an injection. Or you can become infected by means of a blood transfusion, or through a cut on your hand. Or from somebody who has the disease sneezing near you. Some mosquitoes in America are believed to carry the virus.
So what is AIDS? All the independent evidence suggests that it’s a manufactured plague. What the AIDS virus resembles more than anything else is a bonding of Bovine Lymphotrophic or Leukaemia virus (BLV) – a virus that targets lymph cells in cattle and is known to cause cancer – and the sheep Visna virus. The only possible way these two different types of virus, which infect completely different species of animal, could bond together would be by someone engineering it in a laboratory, and then further engineering it, possibly by combining it with the human herpes virus, to allow it to make the jump into a human system.
And all the indications are that that is precisely what was done. What is not clear is whether the release of this virus into the population was an act of deliberate genocide or simply the result of shoddy laboratory technique. The medical profession, after all, has a long and less than illustrious history of contaminated vaccinations. Probably the most notable of these was the administration in 1955 of improperly inactivated Salk polio vaccine prepared by the Cutter Laboratories in Berkeley, California. Almost eighty children contracted polio, and passed the disease on to a further one hundred and twenty relatives and friends. Eleven died and three-quarters of the victims were paralysed.
In a chilling foretaste of the media censorship surrounding the AIDS pandemic – of which more later – Bernice Eddy, the doctor who blew the whistle about the Cutter vaccine, was forced out of her laboratory and out of work for daring to suggest the unthinkable.[14]
The Cutter case was a horrendous example of science gone bad, but it certainly wasn’t the last such incident. The CDC recorded almost forty-nine thousand adverse reactions to vaccinations between 1991 and 1996, and it was estimated by American health authorities that in this period around 90 per cent of the most severe cases were never reported. Extrapolating those figures, perhaps as many as one million Americans may be harmed by vaccines, and tens of thousands seriously injured, every year.[15]
There are three really terrifying facts about AIDS.
First, it is a very efficient killer with a mortality rate of exactly 100 per cent. AIDS is, just like Ebola Zaire, a species-killer: the only difference is that Ebola kills in days, while AIDS takes its time. Virtually all the treatments that are currently available are aimed at prolonging the life of the victim, not curing the disease. As far as is known,
Second, the worldwide rate of infection has been doubling about once every twelve to fourteen months – an exponential increase. Simple mathematics predicts that, unless some positive action is taken to halt the spread of AIDS, everybody in the world will eventually contract the disease within the foreseeable future. If that happens, the entire human race could cease to exist within one or two generations. As Dr John Seale said: ‘The war against AIDS is a war of survival. If we lose, Britain and all her people will perish.’[12]
Third, there is no cure, and it is quite possible that there never will be a cure. For that depressing news, we can thank mathematics as well as virology.
There are at least six different varieties of the AIDS virus infecting the human population, and each is a recombinant retrovirus. The word ‘recombinant’ means that the virus has the ability to change and recombine into a new strain at will, and it has been calculated that each variety of the AIDS virus has a recombinant potential of about nine thousand to the power of four. For the six known varieties, therefore, the number of possible new strains is inconceivably huge – it’s actually the number 354,294 followed by twenty-one zeros. To put that into perspective, we’re talking about unbelievably massive numbers, such as the total number of grains of sand on all the beaches in the world, or the number of stars in the universe. To develop a cure for each strain would be simply impossible – the number is just too enormous. And we’re nowhere near finding a cure for even
But if the foregoing is true, why haven’t the news media seized on this information and trumpeted it to the
