use of bottle caps with nails through them to secure roofing and sheeting. For an excellent study on housing in La Paz, see Koster 1995.
43
2. Bolivia has traditionally had authoritarian governments, a carryover from colonial times. Presidents enjoyed power akin to the concept of the “divine right of kings.” By 1985, Bolivians had suffered a series of military dictators, the most brutal being Luis Garcia Meza, presently serving thirty years in prison for his crimes. In 1997, Bolivians voted for another “old time” military leader, General Hugo Banzer.
44
1. Another acronym for the organization is PSBB, which refers to
45
2. The
46
3. Other successful health projects in Bolivia support this conclusion. Enthusiastic leaders include Gregory Rake with the CHW program in Oruro, Oscar Velasco with Project Concern in Potosi, Evaristo Mayda with ethnomedicinal practitioners in Cochabamba, Irene Vance with Pro-Habitat in La Paz, and Jose Beltran with Plan International in Tarija.
47
4. These nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) include Pro-Habitat (Tarija), Plan-International (Tarija), and Proyecto Chagas (Cochabamba).
48
5. As authorities on the control of Chagas’ disease in Bolivia, Bryan and Tonn (1990) wrote: “PBCM in Sucre is the best project of Chagas’ disease control. It is a small project but well organized, with emphasis on community participation, health education, fumigation, and improvement of housing. It serves as a model for other chagasic control projects.”
49
6. See WHO and UNICEF 1978:2-3; Coreil and Mull 1990; Phillips 1990:150-77.
50
7. USAID in Bolivia subcontracts many of its projects to nongovernmental organizations such as Project Concern, Save the Children, Operation Hope, Caritas. These organizations have their own goals underlying proposed humanitarian objectives of the project. As one measure, PROCOSI was formed in Bolivia in the 1980s and serves as a coordinating board of NGOs in Bolivia through which USAID-Bolivia channels developmental monies.
51
8. Paulo Freire initiated
52
9. These pilot projects modified the role of community health workers (CHWs). A plan was adopted where each CHW was responsible for forty to ninety (average sixty) houses, and their fundamental role was to visit each family weekly to provide motivation and technical education (SOH/CCH 1994:16). This required too much time from CHWs, however, who were required to spend from thirty to sixty hours a week visiting families, considering that they have other responsibilities and are unpaid. In contrast, PBCM’s practice of having traveling teams and CHWs meet together with the community members was more effective. Community leaders were motivated to assume responsibility for seeing that every family carried out its assigned task. The community accepted responsibility to carry out the project and CHWs served as liaison between the house improvement committees and PBCM personnel.