only chance.
The editor who decided to publish
particularly like my politics, but she did like my prose. I was
happy to be appreciated as a writer. The company was the
only unionized publishing house in New York and it also
had an active women’s group. The women employees were
universally wonderful to me—vitally interested in feminism,
moved by my work, conscious and kind. They invited me to
address the employees of the company on their biennial
women’s day, shortly before the publication of
discussed the systematic presumption of male ownership of
women’s bodies and labor, the material reality of that
ownership, the economic degrading of women’s work. (The
talk was subsequently published in abridged form under the
title “Phallic Imperialism” in
men in suits sat dourly through it, taking notes. That,
needless to say, was the end of
other telling event: a highly placed department head threw
the manuscript of
did not recognize male tenderness, he said. I don’t know
whether he made the observation before or after he threw
the manuscript.
review of it in a major periodical was in
after the book was out of bookstores. It was a rave.
Otherwise, the book was ignored: but purposefully, maliciously. Gloria Steinem, Robin Morgan, and Karen DeCrow tried to review the book to no avail. I contacted
nearly a hundred feminist writers, activists, editors. A large
majority made countless efforts to have the book reviewed.
Some managed to publish reviews in feminist publications,
but even those who frequently published elsewhere were
unable to place reviews. No one was able to break the larger
silence.
with great joy, and a shaky sense of victory, that I welcome
its publication in this edition. I have a special love for this
book. Most feminists I know who have read
have taken me aside at one time or another to tell me that
they have a special affection and respect for it. There is, I
believe, something quite beautiful and unique about it.
Perhaps that is because it was written for a human voice.
Perhaps it is because I had to fight so hard to say what is in
it. Perhaps it is because
women’s lives directly: it has been said over and over again
to real women and the experience of saying the words has
informed the writing of them.
by a younger writer, one more reckless and more hopeful