because women were obviously hysterical. Despite Freud’s apostasy and its subsequent acceptance in psychoanalytic theory, hysteria is still associated with the female. She does not have reason or intellect; she has emotion. She starts with a lot of emotion by virtue of being female; when she gets more emotion than is socially acceptable, or when emotion begins to interfere with the exercise

of her female functions or the performance of her female duties,

then she is sedated or tranquilized. Female complaints to male doctors are perceived as emotional excrescences; and indeed, women learn as girls that either they convince through emotional display

or they do not convince at all, so that women do tend to persuade

by force of feeling and do learn early to compensate for the almost

certain knowledge that they will not be believed because they are

not credible no matter how accurate, restrained, or logical they are.

The solution to female emotional excess, whether expressed by the

woman—appropriately by her lights—or hallucinated by the male

doctor, is keeping women calm or numb or asleep with drugs. The

dulling of the female mind is neither feared nor noticed; nor is the

loss of vitality or independence. The female is valued for how she

looks—sometimes droopy eyelids are quite in fashion—and for do­

mestic, sex, and reproductive work, none of which requires that

she be alert. She is given drugs because nothing is lost when she is

drugged, except what is regarded as the too thick edge of her emotional life. She is given drugs because she is not much valued; she takes the drugs because she is not much valued; she stays on the

drugs because she is not much valued; the doctors keep prescribing

the drugs because she is not much valued; the effects of addiction

or dependency on her are not much noted because she is not much

valued. These are prescription drugs, regarded as appropriate medications for women. The junkie, for the most part, is left to the violent life of the streets; the woman addicted to prescribed drugs

has already been tamed and is kept tamed by the drugs. The drugs

are prescribed to these huge numbers of women each and every

year because their usage not only supports but significantly upholds social policy with respect to women: their effects reinforce women in traditional female roles, postures, and passivity; they

dull women’s perceptions of and responses to an environment and

predetermined social status that are demeaning, aggravating, and

enraging; they quiet women down. The use of these drugs to

numb these masses of women shows only how little women are

worth— to the doctors who do the prescribing, to the women

themselves, to the society that depends on this mass drugging of

women to help in keeping women as a class quiescent and women

as individuals invisible or aberrant. Thirty-six million women can

be tranquilized in a year and the nation does not notice it, does not

miss their energy, creativity, wit, intellect, passion, commitment—

so much are these women worth, so important is their contribution, so indelible is their individuality, so essential is their vigor.

In addition to being too emotional, women can be too fat. In

fact, it is hard not to be; and it is sometimes pointed out that

Amerikan standards of beauty dictate a leanness closer to the skeletal depravity of concentration camp victims than to any other socially recognized physiognomy. Most amphetamines are prescribed as diet pills, although women use them to propel themselves

through the normal routine of a day. Depression is commonplace

among women because housework is boring, sex is boring, cooking

is boring, children are boring, and the woman resents being bored

Вы читаете Right-wing Women
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату
×