Commonly used of a narrative in a newspaper. Item connotes an aggregate of which it is a unit – one thing of many. Hence it suggests more than we may wish to direct attention to.
Vulgar, and especially offensive to seamen.
The correct word is jeopard, but in any case there is no need for anything so farfetched and stilted.
Juncture means a joining, a junction; its use to signify a time, however critical a time, is absurd. 'At this juncture the woman screamed.' In reading that account of it we scream too.
Nothing is gained in strength nor precision by this kind of pleonasm. Omit just.
This needless use of the adjective for the noun is probably supposed to be humorous, like 'canine' for dog, 'optic' for eye, 'anatomy' for body, and the like. Happily the offense is not very common.
'He was that kind of a man.' Say that kind of man. Man here is generic, and a genus comprises many kinds. But there cannot be more than one kind of one thing.
Dreadful!
'Last week.' 'The past week.' Neither is accurate: a week cannot be the last if another is already begun; and all weeks except this one are past. Here two wrongs seem to make a right: we can say the week last past. But will we? I trow not.
On is redundant; say, later.
Meaning a place where clothing is washed, this word cannot mean, also, clothing sent there to be washed.
'The ship lays on her side.' A more common error is made in the past tense, as, 'He laid down on the grass.' The confusion comes of the identity of a present tense of the transitive verb
A leading question is not necessarily an important one; it is one that is so framed as to suggest, or lead to, the answer desired. Few others than lawyers use the term correctly.
To say of a man that he leases certain premises leaves it doubtful whether he is lessor or lessee. Being ambiguous, the word should be used with caution.
'He left yesterday.' Leave is a transitive verb; name the place of departure.
'Leave it alone.' By this many persons mean, not that it is to be left in solitude, but that it is to be untouched, or unmolested.
Usually said in disparagement of some wearisome discourse. It is no better than breadthy, or thicknessy.
The words are synonymous, but the latter is the better.
'The regiment had less than five hundred men.' Less relates to quantity, fewer, to number.
'The army's operations were confined to a limited area.' 'We had a limited supply of food.' A large area and an adequate supply would also be limited. Everything that we know about is limited.
'Man is liable to err.' Man is not liable to err, but to error. Liable should be followed, not by an infinitive, but by a preposition.
'The matter is now like it was.' 'The house looked like it would fall.'
'He will likely be elected.' If likely is thought the better word (
'This line of goods.' Leave the word to 'salesladies' and 'salesgentlemen.' 'That line of business.' Say, that business.
'The stream was literally alive with fish.' 'His eloquence literally swept the audience from its feet.' It is bad enough to exaggerate, but to affirm the truth of the exaggeration is intolerable.