Viner, who was now witnessing police-court proceedings for the first time in his life, felt an almost morbid curiosity in hearing the tale unfolded against the prisoner. For some reason, best known to themselves, the police brought forward more evidence than was usual on first proceedings before a magistrate. Viner himself proved the finding of the body; the divisional surgeon spoke as to the cause of death; the dead man’s solicitor testified to his identity and swore positively as to the ring; the pawnbroker gave evidence as to the prisoner’s attempt to pawn or sell the ring that morning. Finally, the police proved that on searching the prisoner after his arrest, a knife was found in his hip-pocket which, in the opinion of the divisional surgeon, would have caused the wound found in the dead man’s body. From a superficial aspect, no case could have seemed clearer.
But in Viner’s reckoning of things there was mystery. Two episodes occurred during the comparatively brief proceedings which made him certain that all was not being brought out. The first was when he himself went into the witness-box to prove his discovery of the body and to swear that the prisoner was the man he had seen running away from the passage. The accused glanced at him with evident curiosity as he came forward; on hearing Viner’s name, he looked at him in a strange manner, changed colour and turned his head away. But when a certain question was put to Viner, he looked round again, evidently anxious to hear the answer.
“I believe you thought, on first seeing him, that the prisoner’s face was familiar to you, Mr. Viner?”
“Yes—I certainly think that I have seen him before, somewhere.”
“You can’t recollect more? You don’t know when or where you saw him?”
“I don’t. But that I have seen him, perhaps met him, somewhere, I am certain.”
This induced the magistrate to urge the accused man—who had steadfastly refused to give name or address—to reveal his identity. But the prisoner only shook his head.
“I would rather not give my name at present,” he answered. “I am absolutely innocent of this charge of murder, but I quite realize that the police are fully justified in bringing it against me. I had nothing whatever to do with Mr. Ashton’s death—nothing! Perhaps the police will find out the truth; and meanwhile I had rather not give my name.”
“You will be well advised to reconsider that,” said the magistrate. “If you are innocent, as you say, it will be far better for you to say who you are, and to see a solicitor. As things are, you are in a very dangerous position.”
But the prisoner shook his head.
“Not yet, at any rate,” he answered. “I want to hear more.”
When the proceedings were over and the accused, formally remanded for a week, had been removed to the cells previous to being taken away, Viner went round to Drillford’s office.
“Look here!” he said abruptly, finding the Inspector alone, “I dare say you think I’m very foolish, but I don’t believe that chap murdered Ashton. I don’t believe it for one second!”
Drillford who was filling up some papers, smiled.
“No?” he said. “Now, why, Mr. Viner?”
“You can call it intuition if you like,” answered Viner. “But I don’t! And I shall be surprised if I’m not right. There are certain things that I should think would strike you.”
“What, for instance?” asked Drillford.
“Do you think it likely that a man who must have known that a regular hue and cry would be raised about that murder, would be such a fool as to go and offer one of the murdered man’s rings within a mile of the spot where the murder took place?” asked Viner.
Drillford turned and looked steadily at his questioner.
“Well, but that’s precisely what he did, Mr. Viner!” he exclaimed. “There’s no doubt whatever that the ring in question was Ashton’s; there’s also no doubt that this man did offer it to Pelver this morning. Either the fellow is a fool or singularly ignorant, to do such a mad thing! But—he did it! And I know why.”
“Why, then?” demanded Viner.
“Because he was just starving,” answered Drillford. “When he was brought in here, straight from Pelver’s, he hadn’t a halfpenny on him, and in the very thick of my questionings—and just think how important they were!—he stopped me. ‘May I say a word that’s just now much more important to me than all this?’ he said. ‘I’m starving! I haven’t touched food or drink for nearly three days. Give me something, if it’s only a crust of bread!’ That’s fact, Mr. Viner.”
“What did you do?” inquired Viner.
“Got the poor chap some breakfast, at once,” answered Drillford, “and let him alone till he’d finished. Have you ever seen a starved dog eat? No—well, I have, and he ate like that—he was ravenous! And when a man’s at that stage, do you think he’s going to stop at anything? Not he! This fellow, you may be sure, after killing and robbing Ashton, had but one thought—how soon he could convert some of the property into cash, so that he could eat. If Pelver had made him that advance, or bought the ring, he’d have made a beeline for the nearest coffee-shop. I tell you he was mad for food!”
“Another thing,” said Viner. “Where is the rest of Mr. Ashton’s property—his watch, chain, the other ring, his purse, and—wasn’t there a pocketbook? How is it this man wasn’t found in possession of them?”
“Easy enough for him to hide all those things, Mr. Viner,” said Drillford, with an indulgent smile. “What easier? You don’t know as much of these things as I do—he could quite easily plant all those articles safely
