storm?”
“I have never seen it personally, but it would not be necessary for me to do so.”
“Could a dog do it while carrying a radar antenna on his back?” I ask.
“I don’t know what you mean.”
“Well, it was nighttime, and even though there may be lights in the specially constructed swimming pool that you use for your therapy, there aren’t any in the Atlantic Ocean. How would Reggie have known where to swim?”
I think I see a quick flash of panic in Dr. Coakley’s eyes. She should just deflect the question as not something covered in her work, but she doesn’t. “Perhaps there was enough moonlight.”
“Dr. Coakley, I don’t know how much time you spend outside, but have you ever seen a major summer storm? Are you aware that there are a lot of clouds involved?”
Judge Gordon admonishes me for being argumentative even before Hawpe has a chance to object. I let Dr. Coakley off the stand, a little less arrogant than when she took it.
The day’s last witness is Craig Langel, the man who reported seeing a stray dog matching Reggie’s description very late on the night of the murder.
In the hands of Hawpe on direct examination, he comes across as a decent citizen who is telling the truth about what he saw that night. Perhaps trying to make up for the Dr. Coakley debacle, Hawpe nurtures the witness, taking almost an hour to bring out what he could have gotten in ten minutes.
The jury has to be bored and wanting to adjourn for the day, so I don’t want to prolong matters. “Mr. Langel, you’ve testified that you saw a dog, possibly a golden retriever, running stray near the harbor that night?”
“That’s correct.”
“He appeared very wet?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Is it unusual for a stray dog to get wet in the middle of a rainstorm?”
“I wouldn’t think so, sir.”
“Thank you. No further questions.”
* * * * *
KEVIN CALLS WITH the news that they got plenty of latent fingerprints at the cabin.
Our expert, George Feder, will eliminate those that turn out to match Richard or Karen, and hopefully that will leave many of Stacy’s prints. I’ll then give one of those to Pete, who will run it through the system. Unfortunately, not nearly everyone in the country has their fingerprints in the national database, so there’s a pretty good chance we won’t get a match.
Even so, I’m putting a lot of stock in this process, because tomorrow Hawpe is going to conclude his case, and I haven’t made a serious dent in it. This looks like a classic domestic murder-suicide, and when the jury starts to deliberate, that’s what they’re going to see.
I can talk all I want about campene and a golden retriever who survived, but it won’t cut to what the jury will see as the core truth. They will see that Richard and Stacy were out there alone, she wound up dead in the water, and he wound up unconscious from an overdose.
It’s unfortunately an easy call, no matter what the wise-ass defense attorney says.
Kevin says that Karen has something else to tell me, and he puts her on the phone so that she can do so directly. “Andy, I think someone has been in the cabin.”
“When?”
“I don’t know, sometime since I was there last.”
Karen has told me that she has not been to the cabin since the murder, so that doesn’t narrow it down much. But she’s also said that no one had a key.
“Was there any sign of forced entry?” I ask. “A broken lock or window?”
“No,” she says, “but I’m sure there were things missing. Mostly some of Stacy’s stuff.”
This is potentially very interesting. If Stacy represented a danger to someone, it could have been because of something in her possession. After her death, they may well have gone looking for it in the cabin, a natural hiding place.
Unfortunately, although it’s interesting, all I can do is put it in the bag with the other information I don’t know what to do with. At this point the bag is bursting at the seams.
Kevin comes over for an evening strategy session. We prepare for Hawpe’s final witnesses, but they are not of great consequence. All he’ll be doing is smoothing out the rough spots; he’s already made his point.
Instead we focus on our own case. We’ll once again establish that Reggie is Richard’s dog, and that he survived that night. We’ll also bring in Dr. King, who will present his version of the events of that night, as well as his contention that Richard did not take the Amenipam orally.
But the more I think about it, the more I feel we should focus on Stacy’s faked identity. Even not knowing who she really is, the deception increases our chances of raising reasonable doubt. If we match her fingerprint, then everything changes, for better or worse, depending on that identity.
Kevin agrees with my assessment, though we both realize we’re in an uncomfortable position. Much of our preparation depends on that fingerprint, and all we can do is wait.
Feder meets us in the morning before court begins, with a copy of what he is sure is Stacy’s print. There were many just like it in the cabin, and a particular concentration of them on the pots and pans. He has also come up with a couple of other prints that do not match Richard or Karen, and he’s brought them as well.
To save us time, Feder agrees to bring the prints to Pete Stanton, since they have worked together many times in the past. Kevin and I head into court, where Hawpe proceeds to do us a favor by making his final four witnesses last all day. We will not have to start our case until tomorrow, and the delay works to our advantage.
Kevin brings a criminologist named Jeffrey Blalock to our evening meeting. He was formerly a detective in Bergen County, specializing in identity theft and computer crime. With the explosion of illegal activity in those areas, he left the force to set up a private consulting practice, and is now recognized as a leading expert in the field.
Blalock will be the witness through whom we’ll make our claim that Stacy’s background is fake, and he has spent the past couple of days going over the information Sam has gotten, as well as the documents Kevin brought back from Minnesota.
I usually like to spend far more time prepping witnesses as crucial as Blalock, but things are moving too fast to allow that. As I start to talk with him, I harbor a secret fear that he’s going to say we’re crazy, that Stacy Harriman is in reality Stacy Harriman.
He doesn’t. “Stacy Harriman never existed. She was created out of whole cloth.”
“How would this woman manage to do something like that?” I ask.
He smiles. “She wouldn’t. This is WITSEC.”
“They deny it.”
“Under oath?” he asks.
“No, but to a court.”
“Let me put it this way…,” he says, and then points to my desk. “What is that?”
“My desk,” I say.
“If I tell you that’s not your desk, are you going to believe me?”
“Of course not.”
He nods. “Right, because you know better.” He holds up the folder of documents relating to Stacy. “These are as clear to me as that desk is to you. This is WITSEC, no matter what they told that judge.”
As much as I’m surprised that their attorney, Alice Massengale, would lie in court, what Blalock is saying instinctively feels right. Of course, there is always the possibility that Massengale herself was not told the truth and was representing to the court what she thought was accurate information.
I call Cindy Spodek at her Boston office. I don’t want to involve her in the case any more than I have, because it seems to have caused her a problem with her FBI bosses. But this WITSEC confusion is bugging me, and I’m hoping Cindy’s experience can help debug me.
I explain to her the situation and what transpired in court, and she listens without interrupting. When I finish,
