some divine right to do that… you're implying that everyone else on the planet—short of the reincarnations of Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot—agrees with you in every detail.' He spread his arms and declaimed to the trees,
I said lamely, 'Okay. Maybe I should have phrased some things differently, yesterday. I didn't set out to insult you.'
Rourke shook his head, amused. 'No offense taken. It's a battle, after all—I can hardly expect instant surrender. You're loyal to a narrow definition of Big H—and maybe you even honestly believe that everyone else shares it. I support a broader definition. We'll agree to disagree. And I'll see you in the trenches.'
Narrow? I'd opened my mouth to deny the accusation, but then I hadn't known how to defend myself. What could I have said? That I'd once made a sympathetic documentary about gender migrants? (How magnanimous.) And now I had to balance that with a frankenscience story on Voluntary Autists?
So he'd had the last word (if only in real time). He'd shaken my hand, and we'd parted.
I played the whole thing through, one more time. Rourke was remarkably eloquent—and almost charismatic, in his own strange way— and everything he'd said was relevant. But the private terminology, the manic outbursts… it was all too weird, too messy and confrontational.
I left the take unused, unquoted.
I'd gone on to another appointment at the university: an afternoon with the famous Manchester MIRG— Medical Imaging Research Group. It had seemed like too good a chance to miss—and imaging, after all, lay behind the definitive identification of partial autism.
I skimmed through the footage. A lot of it was good—and it would probably make a worthwhile five-minute story of its own, for one of SeeNet's magazine programs—but it was clear now that Rourke's own concise notepad demonstration had supplied all the brain scans
The main experiment I'd filmed involved a student volunteer reading poetry in silence, while the scanner subtitled the image other brain with each line as it was read. There were three independently-computed subtitles, based on primary visual data, recognized word-shapes, and the brain's final semantic representations… the last sometimes only briefly matching the others, before the words' precise meanings diffused out into a cloud of associations. However eerily compelling this was, though, it had nothing to do with Lament's area.
Toward the end of the day, one of the researchers—Margaret Williams, head of the software development team—had suggested that I climb into the womb of the scanner, myself. Maybe they wanted to turn the tables on me—to scrutinize and record me with their machinery, just as I'd been doing to them for the past four hours. Williams had certainly been as insistent as if she'd believed it was a matter of justice.
She said, 'You could record the subject's-eye view. And we could get a look at all your hidden extras.'
I'd declined. 'I don't know what the magnetic fields would do to the hardware.'
'Nothing, I promise. Most of it must be optical—and everything else will be shielded. You get on and off planes all the time, don't you? You walk through the normal security gates?'
'Yes, but—'
'Our fields are no stronger. We could even try reading your optic nerve activity, via the scanner—and then comparing the data with your own direct record.'
'I don't have the download module with me. It's back at the hotel.'
She pursed her lips, frustrated—obviously dying to tell me to shut up, do as I was told, and get inside the scanner. 'That's a pity. And I suppose you'd have problems with the warranty if we improvised something—our own cable and interface…?'
'I'm afraid so. The software would log the use of non-standard equipment, and then I'd be in deep trouble at the next annual service.'
But she still wasn't ready to give up. 'You were talking about the Voluntary Autists, before. If you wanted something spectacular to illustrate
I said, 'It's very kind of you to offer. But… what kind of tenth-rate journalist would I be, if I started resorting to using myself as the subject of my own stories?'
7
Two weeks before the Einstein Centenary conference was due to begin, I signed a contract with SeeNet for
The truth was, I didn't care about the details; all that mattered was putting
Still, anything had to be better than coming face-to-face with a victim of Distress.
I left a message for Violet Mosala. I assumed she was still at her home in Cape Town, though the software which answered her number was giving nothing away. I introduced myself, thanked her for generously agreeing to give her time to the project, and generally spouted polite cliches. I said nothing to encourage her to call me back; I knew it wouldn't take much real-time conversation to reveal my total ignorance of her life and work.
I'd psyched myself up to be 'forced to relive' Daniel Cavolini's revival—but I should have known all along how absurd that was. Editing never re-created the past; it was more like performing an autopsy on it. I worked on the sequence dispassionately—and every hour I spent reshaping it made the job of imagining the responses of a viewer, seeing it all for the first time, more and more a matter of calculation and instinct—and less and less connected to anything I felt about the events myself. Even the final cut, superficially fluid and immediate, was for me a kind of post-mortem revival of a post-mortem revival. It had happened, it was over; whatever brief illusion of life the technology managed to create, it was no more capable of climbing out of the screen and walking down the street than any other twitching corpse.
Daniel's brother, Luke, had been charged with the murder—and had already pleaded guilty. I logged on to the court records system and skimmed through footage of the three hearings which had taken place so far. The magistrate had ordered a psychiatric report, which had concluded that Luke Cavolini suffered from occasional bouts of 'inappropriate anger' which had never quite put him far enough out of touch with reality to have him classified as mentally ill and treated against his will. He was competent, and culpable, and understood precisely what he'd done—and he'd even had a 'motive': an argument the night before, about a jacket of Daniel's which he'd borrowed. He'd end up in an ordinary prison, for at least fifteen years.
