reabsorption of rebellious Novgorod and Pskov. For all its deference to hierarchy and tradition, the law code of 1649 represented an important stage in the rationalization and secularization of Russian culture. The power of the annotated sovereign was fully invested in his appointed bureaucrats to punish 'without any mercy' almost anyone challenging the 'sovereign honor' of the 'Muscovite state.' The monasteries were hurt economically by the outlawing of any new tax-exempt pledging of wealth and property, and politically by the creation of a government bureau to administer their affairs.
The monopoly of Church Slavonic as the written language of Muscovite culture was also broken by the large- scale reprinting and dissemination of a law code written in a language close to the contemporary vernacular. This Ulozhenie remained the basic code of the land until 1833, and played a role in the development of the modern Russian language that has been compared with that of Luther's Bible in the making of modern German. Indeed, the language of the Ulozhenie was in some ways 'closer to the contemporary Russian literary and conversational language than the language not only of Karamzin, but of Pushkin.'28
Alexis, however, was not prepared to build his rule on laws rather than autocratic authority, or to speak in the language of the chanceries rather than the chronicles. Having conceded a code to the rebellious city dwellers, he turned to a program of xenophobic distraction-discriminating against foreign merchants and convening in 1651 and 1653 zemsky sobers to sanction mobilization against Poland, then the protectorate over the Ukraine, which made war inevitable. At the same time, Alexis turned in ¦!' I'' iiiim for administrative support and spiritual guidance to a monk
named Nikon, in whom the theocratic answer to Russian disorder found its last and greatest exponent.
Nikon was an ascetic from the trans-Volga region who awed his contemporaries with both spiritual intensity and physical presence. Shortly after arriving in Moscow as head of the New Monastery of the Savior (Novospassky), this six-foot six-inch monk cast his spell over young Tsar Alexis, who began to have regular Friday meetings with him. The decisive event in Nikon's career appears to have been the arrival in Moscow in January, 1649, of Patriarch Paissius of Jerusalem. He was impressed by Nikon and helped secure his appointment as Metropolitan of Novgorod, the second highest position in the Russian hierarchy. Nikon for his part appears to have been dazzled by Paissius' retinue of priests and scholars, who brought with them tales of the Holy Land and of the lost splendors of the Greek Church.
Paissius told of the horrors he had seen in the Balkans and the Ukraine, pleading for 'a new Moses' who would 'liberate pious Orthodox Christians from unclean hands, from wild beasts-and shine like a sun amidst the stars.'29 The call for deliverance was addressed to the Tsar, but he-like his father before him-felt the need amidst widespread social unrest and intrigue to lean upon die Patriarch. Thus, in November, 1651, the Tsar began pairing his own name with that of Patriarch Joseph in official charters, while commencing a theatrical transfer of the remains of past patriarchs to the Moscow Kremlin for reburial. The remains of Patriarch Hermogenes were exhumed and venerated; and Alexis sent Nikon to Solovetsk to bring back to the Cathedral of the Assumption the remains of Metropolitan Philip, whose murder by Ivan the Terrible had given an aura of holy martyrdom to the ecclesiastical hierarchy. While Nikon was still gone, Patriarch Joseph died; and within a few weeks Alexis wrote Nikon a long, half-confessional letter of grief addressed to 'the great sun' from 'your earthly tsar.'30 Clearly Nikon was some kind of higher, heavenly tsar, and it is hardly surprising that he was appointed Joseph's successor as Patriarch in July. For six years, Nikon became the virtual ruler of Russia, using the ecclesiastical hierarchy and the printing press to extend the program of ecclesiastical discipline he had developed at Novgorod.
In the far-flung see of Novgorod, Nikon dealt not only with a rebellious, Westward-looking city, but also with the chaotic and primitive northern regions, where he had previously served as a monastic administrator. There Nikon became attached to ecclesiastical splendor and magnificence as a kind of compensation for the bleakness of the region and the asceticism of his personal life. As Metropolitan of Novgorod, he was able to extend and even tighten central control over the monasteries of the north by securing
from the Tsar complete exemption from subordination to the new governmental department created by the law code of 1649 to regulate monasteries.
As patriarch, Nikon not only shared with the Tsar the title 'Great Sovereign,' as had Philaret, but in fact exercised sole sovereignty when the Tsar went off to lead the battle against Poland. Nikon used this position to set up a virtual theocracy in Moscow with the aid of visiting Greek and transplanted Ukrainian and White Russian prelates. Not just the Patriarch, but the entire episcopal hierarchy was given a new aura of majesty. Theatrical rituals were introduced, more elaborate vestments and miters required, and elaborate church councils held with foreign Orthodox prelates participating. The traditional Palm Sunday procession, in which the Tsar led the Patriarch on a donkey through Red Square in imitation of Christ's entry into Jerusalem, was instituted in the provinces, where local civil authorities were encouraged also to humble themselves in this way before local metropolitans and bishops.31
Most important was Nikon's effort to bring order and uniformity to Russian worship through a new series of printed service books. The printing program in the last years of Joseph's patriarchate had already contributed to the sense of special dignity and destiny that Nikon felt about the Russian Church. Publication of a Book of the One True and Orthodox Faith in 1648, an edited version of Mogila's Catechism in 1649, ar,d tne Pilot Book (Kormchaia Kniga) in 1650 provided Muscovy with, respectively, an encyclopedia of polemic materials directed largely against Uniats and Jews; 'its first manual for popular religious instruction';32 and its first systematic corpus of canon law. The first two works (and the apocalyptical Book of Cyril, which was also enjoying new popularity in Moscow of the late forties) came to Moscow from Kiev, the Pilot Book from Serbia. Moscow was rapidly becoming the focal point for all the hopes of the Orthodox East. As Muscovy launched its successful attack on Poland in the early years of Nikon's patriarchate, its sense of holy mission and special calling grew apace. Even non-Slavic Orthodox principalities, such as Moldavia and Georgia, began to explore the possibilities of a protectorate status under Moscow similar to that which Khmelnitsky's Cossacks accepted in 1653. Meanwhile the Greek-speaking monk Arsenius Sukhanov, who had accompanied Paissius back to Jerusalem on the first of two lengthy trips to gather books and information from the rest of the Orthodox world, reported that Orthodoxy had been corrupted in the Mediterranean area by Latin errors. He revived the long quiescent theme of Moscow as the third and last Rome, and added that 'all Christendom' awaited the liberation of Constantinople by Russian force.33 While Alexis led Russian troops
?
into battle against foreign enemies of the faith, Nikon led his miscellaneous array of editors into combat against alleged corruptions within.
Between his deletions from a new psalter in October, 1652, and the appearance of new service books in 1655-6, Nikon sponsored an extensive and detailed series of reforms.34 He changed time-honored forms of worship: substituting three fingers for two in the sign of the cross; three hallelujahs for two; five consecrated loaves for seven at the offertory; one loaf rather than many on the altar; processions against rather than with the direction of the sun. Nikon eliminated some practices altogether (the twelve prostrations accompanying the prayer of Ephrem the Syrian during Lent, the blessing of the waters on Epiphany eve); introduced textual changes affecting all three persons of the Holy Trinity. He altered the form of addressing God in the Lord's prayer, the description of the Holy Spirit in the creed, and the spelling of Jesus' name (from Isus to Iisus) in all sacred writings.
At the same time, Nikon tried to impose a new, more austere artistic style, ordering the elimination of florid, northern motifs from Russian architecture (tent roofs, onion domes, seven- and eight-pointed crosses, and so on). In their place he introduced a neo-Byzantine emphasis on spherical domes, classical lines, and the use of the plain,
