•
•
•
•
EARLY ATTACK SUNDAY 24 FEBRUARY VII CORPS TAC CP
At 0930, John Yeosock called.
'Fred, John, CINC wants to know if you can attack early.'
'Say again.' I was not sure I heard this right.
'The Marines have been having success, and the CINC does not want to wait until tomorrow to attack. He wants to know if we can go early, today.'
I was genuinely surprised — shocked maybe was more accurate. We had considered every other possibility except this. In a flash, my brain went from the reflective, intensely focused, get-ready pace of a moment before to 'warp-speed' active. Before I replied to John, dozens of thoughts flashed through my head, along with dozens more about what I would have to do to make it all happen.
What is the CINC really asking? was the first mental question. I quickly concluded that it wasn't actually
Other questions shot through my head.
What about unit positions in relation to one another? Would they have to move? What about artillery preparations, logistics (especially fuel), the British move forward, and the orders already disseminated and rehearsed? And how would an early attack affect day and night operations, and operations forty-eight hours from now?
I told myself, Whatever you do, keep it simple. I knew that success early on in an attack builds its own momentum. I had seen that many times before. So, given this go-early situation, I did not need to put additional barriers in front of the corps by making some sudden change of plan. If we could simply back everything up to today that we had planned to do tomorrow at BMNT, then that would be the best way to do it.
All this raced through my brain in nanoseconds. OK, I decided, keep it simple and continue with what we've already set in motion, but with some major time and tactical adjustments. Now I had to see whether that was possible.
'Yes, we can do it,' I told John, after a pause of no more than a second or two. 'Tell the CINC yes, but I still want to talk to my commanders.'
'XVIII Corps said they could go on two hours' notice,' Yeosock answered. 'How does that sound to you? Based on how soon the Egyptians can get ready, it looks like 1500 at the earliest. Take that as a warning order, with a confirmation at 1300, for a 1500 attack.'
'Sounds OK to me, but I still want to talk to my commanders.'
That call, and the cease-fire decision four days later, turned out to be the biggest surprises of the war for VII Corps. We had been over the plan with Third Army and with CENTCOM so many times that I thought we had considered every possibility. And now came one that we had never considered; it was
Why did the CINC want us to go early? What had brought on this very large, very sudden change? Except for John's remark that the Marines were doing well in the east, I was without a clue. The best understanding I could come to in the first moments after John's call was this: Since the Marines were going faster than expected, the fixing operation to our east was now going to take much less than a full day; this would allow us to attack today instead of tomorrow. Thus, as I understood it, the call from John Yeosock was primarily a matter of moving up the attack timetable fifteen hours.[26]
If that was the case (and I had no indication from John of anything else; he hadn't mentioned any change of missions or different methods of attack), I figured that the CINC was making no other changes in the plan. Nothing in my own intelligence indicated that the Iraqis in our sector were doing anything different from what we expected. There was no release of the 1st CAV Division from theater reserve, which would have signaled that all was well in the east, and that the Iraqi situation was so well known that early commitment of the reserve was a good choice. There was no 'go as soon as you are ready.' There was only 'go early,' but in coordination with XVIII Corps and the Egyptian Corps, just as the original plan said.