account and put into a savings account, it increases M2,
but the question is: Does it remain as part of M1 or is it subtracted from it? Herbert Mayo, in his book
accounts, the money supply is increased under the
narrow definition (M-l) but is unaffected if the
broader definition (M-2) is employed.' This implies
that, when money is moved from a checking account
APPENDIX
595
to a savings account, it is subtracted from Ml. Other-
wise, it would not mcrease Ml when it is moved back
again from savings to checking. When we spoke on
the phone, you confirmed that his interpretation is
correct.
But how can that be? The money moved from check-
ing to savings or any other investment does not disap-
pear into a vault. It is spent in fulfillment of the
investment project. It is given to a vendor or a contractor or an employee and reappears in their checking accounts
where it becomes part of M1 once again. It would seem,
therefore, that it doesn't really leave M1 at all. It merely increases M2.
I have hypothesized one possible explanation. It is
that the money
the checking accounts of borrowers. The time period
might be short—perhaps less than thirty days on the
average—but it still needs to be considered when cal-
culating the money aggregates. Therefore, Ml
savings, but that is only a temporary effect. Ml will
be increased once again just as soon as the new M2
money is redirected to borrowers. Is that a correct ex-
planation?
Thankyou for your help with these puzzling items.
Sincerely,
G. EdwardGriffin
(805)496-1649
596
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, Charles.
Aldrich, Nelson W. Letters to John A. Sleicher, July 16, 1913; to W i l l i a m H o w a r d Taft, Oct. 3,1913. Nelson Aldrich Papers. Library of Congress.
Angell, Norman.
Attali, Jacques. Translated by Barbara Ellis.
A t w o o d , Harry.